Generation IV Internal Engine 2005-2014 LS2 | LS3 | LS7 | L92 | LS9

Solid cam LS3

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-02-2014, 08:31 AM
  #21  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (12)
 
newschool72's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: georgia
Posts: 1,862
Received 11 Likes on 10 Posts

Default

Ive never run solid rollers, just because of the nightmares Ive heard and seen from others running them in heavy street use with a lot of idle time and low RPM cruising. They are without a doubt the way to go from max HP setups. Maybe they have improved over the years. I sure hope so. Maybe the LS platform has better idle RPM oiling than the SBC and BBC. I would run the ceramic solid rollers without hesitation, but they are out of the price range of the average, hobby gear head. Then again, an engine built to spin to 8K reliably and often is out of the average guys price range too.
My whole purpose for making noise on the OPs thread was to warn him of the extra labor and possible pitfalls of running solid rollers on the street, especially with the RPMs a hydr roller can spin to these days.
Someone educate me on how the LS engines can run the solids without issue compared to the other engines in the GM stable. Im always happy to learn something new. I think its a waste of time to get out of bed in the morning if you don't.
Old 04-02-2014, 02:40 PM
  #22  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (2)
 
TurboBuick6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 675
Received 92 Likes on 57 Posts

Default

The biggest deal here is that a solid liftwer is not required to achive well over 500hp and turn over 7500 RPM. A good set or morel short travels will handle a lot of lobe and RPM. I would not go solid ever in my street driven LS. Shoot our in house engine has .750 lift and will turb 8,500 on..... wait for it..... Hydro lifters and.......stock LS7 Rockers.
Old 04-02-2014, 08:38 PM
  #23  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
SIG-054's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Adelaide, South Australia
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Our dynos read a lot lower than your dynos.
I dyno'd at 440rwhp and ran 124mph with 4100lb.

Looks like Cam motion has a neat low lash solid roller in trial atm?

I don't mind either or hydro or solid, i take it the maintenance will be similar, just want what's most reliable at the upper end of the rev range for a stock bottom end ls3.

If 5206 morels will reliably do it then I'll use them, but if a solid will gain more power and won't have many drawbacks as kip from cam notion has stated from his. Then what's to lose?
Old 04-03-2014, 07:07 AM
  #24  
TECH Regular
 
Dyno Junkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 433
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SIG-054
I dyno'd at 440rwhp and ran 124mph with 4100lb.
What have you got in that car to get to 4,100lbs?

Our Monaro weighs in at 3,880lbs with AP brakes, stereo and 70kg of sound deadening.
Old 04-03-2014, 11:52 AM
  #25  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
SIG-054's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Adelaide, South Australia
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

It's only 1860kg on a weighbridge, it's a fully optioned senator mate, coulsen seats, sunroof, 6 piston brakes etc. My vt weighed more.



Quick Reply: Solid cam LS3



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:15 AM.