Differences between 4.8 models? LY2, L20
#1
Differences between 4.8 models? LY2, L20
Do these all have the same flat top pistons in them? Trying to understand the compression differences between them. I've heard the L20 might have valve reliefs in the pistons? but I can't seem to confirm that online?
Compression is listed as...
LY2 - 9.1:1
L20 - 8.8:1
If the only difference is the 61.15cc head VS the 64.45cc head? Do the use the same pistons, blocks, rods, head gaskets etc? So 3.3cc of CC is only dropping compression .3?
Compression is listed as...
LY2 - 9.1:1
L20 - 8.8:1
If the only difference is the 61.15cc head VS the 64.45cc head? Do the use the same pistons, blocks, rods, head gaskets etc? So 3.3cc of CC is only dropping compression .3?
Last edited by Forcefed86; 07-19-2017 at 01:55 PM.
#7
Restricted User
There was an early Gen 4 5.3 that stuck to the 862 heads. I can't remember the code off the top of my head but it was primarily used in vans and some trucks, and had an old style truck intake on it still.
Every gen 4 4.8/5.3 with flat tops came with 799/243s
Every gen 4 4.8/5.3 with flat tops came with 799/243s
Trending Topics
#8
TECH Senior Member
#9
#10
If you have access to both for the same money, The L20 intake pockets will allow you more cam and the injectors flow more as well. Only downside is a bit of added cost for the VVT delete (depending on what you're doing).
__________________
http://www.trickflow.com/emain.asp
Click Above for Product Information
Click Above for Product Information
#11
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
These specs are for the Silverado LY2 and L20 only, the Express/Savana engines may differ slightly. Both use 799/243 heads.
The Engines are identical- Block/Heads/Intake Manifold/Crankshaft/Connecting Rods/Piston Rings, with the exception of;
-Pistons (for VVT)
-The cam (for VVT)
-Timing cover (for VVT)
-Cam sprocket (for VVT)
-Intake valves (for E85 Flex Fuel)
-Valve covers (Older design was used on LY2)
-Oil filler neck
-Oil pan (different shape, same capacity of 6 qts.)
-Injectors for flex fuel.
-MAF Sensors, Airbox, and Intake tube (MAF Sensor location changed)
2007.5-2009 Silverado LY2 4.8L
-No VVT
-9.1:1 Compression using 0cc Flat Top Pistons
-295-Hp at 5,600 rpm, and 305-Tq at 4,600 rpm
2010-2013 Silverado L20 4.8L
-Has VVT
-Flex Fuel Capable
-8.8:1 Compression. The lower compression, compared to the LY2, is due to the added valve reliefs cut into the pistons for the VVT using -3cc Flat Top Pistons
-302-Hp at 5,600 rpm, and 305-Tq at 4,600 rpm.
Thought I what list all the differences in the two engines just in case, and yes...the valve reliefs are the only reason for the compression difference.
The Engines are identical- Block/Heads/Intake Manifold/Crankshaft/Connecting Rods/Piston Rings, with the exception of;
-Pistons (for VVT)
-The cam (for VVT)
-Timing cover (for VVT)
-Cam sprocket (for VVT)
-Intake valves (for E85 Flex Fuel)
-Valve covers (Older design was used on LY2)
-Oil filler neck
-Oil pan (different shape, same capacity of 6 qts.)
-Injectors for flex fuel.
-MAF Sensors, Airbox, and Intake tube (MAF Sensor location changed)
2007.5-2009 Silverado LY2 4.8L
-No VVT
-9.1:1 Compression using 0cc Flat Top Pistons
-295-Hp at 5,600 rpm, and 305-Tq at 4,600 rpm
2010-2013 Silverado L20 4.8L
-Has VVT
-Flex Fuel Capable
-8.8:1 Compression. The lower compression, compared to the LY2, is due to the added valve reliefs cut into the pistons for the VVT using -3cc Flat Top Pistons
-302-Hp at 5,600 rpm, and 305-Tq at 4,600 rpm.
Thought I what list all the differences in the two engines just in case, and yes...the valve reliefs are the only reason for the compression difference.
Last edited by 07NBSChevy; 07-22-2017 at 03:39 AM.
#12
TECH Senior Member
WHOA! You have done some serious homework, again! Good info! And THANKS!