Generation IV Internal Engine 2005-2014 LS2 | LS3 | LS7 | L92 | LS9

370 Build

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-14-2017 | 11:47 PM
  #1  
BracketRacer82's Avatar
Thread Starter
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Aug 2017
Posts: 52
Likes: 2
Default 370 Build

Hello everyone. I thought I would share my build thread as it progresses over the next several months. I have a goal to be running in the spring as time and money allows.

I have decided to switch motor platforms in my G body drag car. I have been running a Pontiac for years but am changing over to the LS world. It seems to be a good way for me to maybe make a little more power, loose some weight, and be able to get parts in days not months.

Motor details are as follows:

Iron 6.0 bored to 4.030 and honed with deck plates
New GM crank 3.622
K1 rods
Weisco 12cc dome pistons
TSP CNC LS3 heads with stainless hollow stem valves 64 cc
Hoping to be around 13.5:1 compression
E85
Cam and valve train will be Spec'd by Martin Smallwood as I start assembling engine and fine tune some specs
CID intake
Holley EFI
vacuum pump
1 7/8 4th gen speed engineering headers modified slightly to fit a g body
3" exhaust with x pipe and magnaflow mufflers dumped at the rear axle.

3300 lbs
Th400 with a brake
PTC converter spec'd appropriately
4.56 gear
275 Pro Radial
Should be right around 3250 race weight

So what does everyone think this should run ET wise? I have some goals but will keep them to myself until after we make a few hits and iron it out. I have no problem spinning this thing 8k plus. It's not my work car so if it breaks, it goes in the trailer until I get around to fixing it.




Old 08-15-2017 | 09:46 PM
  #2  
KW Baraka's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 2,180
Likes: 131
From: S.A., TX
Default

Depending on cam specs, I'd say somewhere between 9.0 and 15.0 seconds in the quarter.

KW
Old 08-15-2017 | 10:59 PM
  #3  
BracketRacer82's Avatar
Thread Starter
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Aug 2017
Posts: 52
Likes: 2
Default

9.0, lol. At least part of your reply was optimistic. I don't think that's gonna happen though. 15.0 could happen if something goes wrong, so you never know.
Old 08-15-2017 | 11:09 PM
  #4  
KW Baraka's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 2,180
Likes: 131
From: S.A., TX
Default

Originally Posted by BracketRacer82
9.0, lol. At least part of your reply was optimistic. I don't think that's gonna happen though. 15.0 could happen if something goes wrong, so you never know.
Well.......neither should happen.......but you'll fall somewhere in there, depending on the cam specs......

KW
Old 08-16-2017 | 12:20 AM
  #5  
BracketRacer82's Avatar
Thread Starter
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Aug 2017
Posts: 52
Likes: 2
Default

Originally Posted by KW Baraka
Well.......neither should happen.......but you'll fall somewhere in there, depending on the cam specs......

KW
In Martin I trust.
Old 08-16-2017 | 01:24 AM
  #6  
Patron's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 948
Likes: 1
Default

Rpm peak will be the deciding factor as I know Martin has started favoring the CID intake. Thought of *ER Racing* (with a .030 bore vs standard Ls3 .065 bore.) my ? Comes bac to how much rpm as it's harder on parts & adds more to cost over all. Good vac would be nice. Higher stall would help place you near a 9 sec car at 3200lbs and 4.56's rpm is needed to go 9"s. 5200 + stall maybe more or less depending on Rpm.
Old 08-16-2017 | 12:37 PM
  #7  
BracketRacer82's Avatar
Thread Starter
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Aug 2017
Posts: 52
Likes: 2
Default


Small end rod clearance was checked and is consistent. I actually got all the spirolocs in without a bloody finger for once.
Old 08-16-2017 | 01:16 PM
  #8  
BracketRacer82's Avatar
Thread Starter
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Aug 2017
Posts: 52
Likes: 2
Default

Originally Posted by Patron
Rpm peak will be the deciding factor as I know Martin has started favoring the CID intake. Thought of *ER Racing* (with a .030 bore vs standard Ls3 .065 bore.) my ? Comes bac to how much rpm as it's harder on parts & adds more to cost over all. Good vac would be nice. Higher stall would help place you near a 9 sec car at 3200lbs and 4.56's rpm is needed to go 9"s. 5200 + stall maybe more or less depending on Rpm.
I really expect the converter to be 5500+ with this combination. If the gearing proves to need adjusted, I will do that as needed. I usually 1/8th mile race but like having a car capable of doing both.
Old 08-17-2017 | 07:25 PM
  #9  
64post's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
10 Year Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 1,695
Likes: 227
From: Sonoma Co. Ca.
Default

Low 10's? It's a nice set up.
Old 08-17-2017 | 10:56 PM
  #10  
KW Baraka's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 2,180
Likes: 131
From: S.A., TX
Default

Originally Posted by BracketRacer82
In Martin I trust.
Better approximations can be done when cam specs are know. Martin should get you as close to optimal as anyone could.

Best of luck!!!

KW
Old 08-18-2017 | 10:50 AM
  #11  
BracketRacer82's Avatar
Thread Starter
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Aug 2017
Posts: 52
Likes: 2
Default

Luckily, the chassis it's going in is fairly well sorted out. Other than having to tighten the front end up due to the weight loss of the LS over the Pontiac that was in there, it shouldn't give me too much hassle I hope.

This was the last hit the Iron headed Pontiac made with a 1.41 60 ft. That torque motor sure was fun.

Old 08-18-2017 | 03:41 PM
  #12  
G Atsma's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 21,579
Likes: 3,301
From: Central Cal.
Default

Yep! Looks like a very uplifting experience! LOL (Could NOT resist!)
Old 08-20-2017 | 07:13 AM
  #13  
Patron's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 948
Likes: 1
Default

You all got me with this smaller stroke stuff. It's easier to Rev! I'm down to 2 cam choices and 1 just doesn't have enough compression( the Other is perfect) who would think a build with 13.1 comp would spin too 8500 + for Rpm. More compression would be nice but it did so well it's got me. Love the way your chassis hooks need to try and keep the car down for Lower ET. Fellow told me he's unwilling to do my suspension unless I get a 6point cage. Said it would twist like pretzel. S&W roll cage for the save. I have a nice stall as is for a 4l80e but decided to call and see what's made in a 8 inch converter (window shopping) No one has it as a shelf part. Chris said he would have to make me 1. Cost was 1500 vs 900 for my 1st inch single disc. converter. Options add to the 1500. Options I like. I'll get the cage this wk it's pretty cheap.

Last edited by Patron; 08-20-2017 at 07:19 AM.
Old 08-20-2017 | 07:49 AM
  #14  
big hammer's Avatar
10 Second Club
15 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 3,427
Likes: 191
From: over dere
Default

Growing up as an SBC guy the thought of a 3.622 stroke being "short" is kinda funny
Old 08-20-2017 | 09:38 AM
  #15  
BracketRacer82's Avatar
Thread Starter
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Aug 2017
Posts: 52
Likes: 2
Default

Originally Posted by Patron
You all got me with this smaller stroke stuff. It's easier to Rev! I'm down to 2 cam choices and 1 just doesn't have enough compression( the Other is perfect) who would think a build with 13.1 comp would spin too 8500 + for Rpm. More compression would be nice but it did so well it's got me. Love the way your chassis hooks need to try and keep the car down for Lower ET. Fellow told me he's unwilling to do my suspension unless I get a 6point cage. Said it would twist like pretzel. S&W roll cage for the save. I have a nice stall as is for a 4l80e but decided to call and see what's made in a 8 inch converter (window shopping) No one has it as a shelf part. Chris said he would have to make me 1. Cost was 1500 vs 900 for my 1st inch single disc. converter. Options add to the 1500. Options I like. I'll get the cage this wk it's pretty cheap.
The above picture was leaving off the trans brake. When leaving off the foot, the front end was only half as high. The et difference was .003 at 60 ft and .01 at the 1/8th.
Old 08-20-2017 | 02:23 PM
  #16  
pantera_efi's Avatar
FormerVendor

iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,157
Likes: 17
From: Santa Ana, CA. USA
Default Crankshaft TW 58x

Hi Racer82, I ask the Tooth Count of your Crankshaft Target Wheel ?

The two choices are 24xe and 58x.

I ask the Timing Set Choice ?

Lance
Old 08-20-2017 | 02:35 PM
  #17  
Patron's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 948
Likes: 1
Default

Hammer your right as my old 383 only had a 3.75 stroke with .030 over and that's a lot for a factory block as in crank on a gen 1 sbc. 4 inches is my new gold standard.


I seen and read about how sometimes leaving on the foot brake can result in a better ET and 60ft against a trans brake with a two step. You can try either to see what the car likes. I've got to inquire on how we could set it up to not do a wheelstand. I'm going with a Caltrax setup in the rear with a nice size tire 305 min. Honestly didn't want a cage and Still don't. But asking for mid 1.20's to 1.30's sixty foot. I guess. The bars going thur the back window is what's eating at me. It's no longer a sleeper when you can plainly see the cage coming out the back window to help keeping it from twisting. I know it's nesassary but want to look and seem stock as much as possible. Don't ask how much stall I have in mind. I'm just saying F it.
Old 08-20-2017 | 04:19 PM
  #18  
BracketRacer82's Avatar
Thread Starter
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Aug 2017
Posts: 52
Likes: 2
Default

Originally Posted by Pantera EFI
Hi Racer82, I ask the Tooth Count of your Crankshaft Target Wheel ?

The two choices are 24xe and 58x.

I ask the Timing Set Choice ?

Lance
58x

Rollmaster 4x
Old 08-20-2017 | 05:07 PM
  #19  
Patron's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 948
Likes: 1
Default

Bracket I assume your using a ecu conversion for 58 wheel to 24 wheel older style ecu. I know the newer style ecu' requires a drive by wire cable system. I'm using the same timing chain also.
Old 08-20-2017 | 06:23 PM
  #20  
pantera_efi's Avatar
FormerVendor

iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,157
Likes: 17
From: Santa Ana, CA. USA
Default Holley ECU = 58x (60-2) Native

Hi Bracket, GOOD Choice, the 58x TW has a 1/4* Spark Accuracy.

This is ALSO good for coil Dwell Control.

DO you have the 4.x version Firmware in YOUR Holley ECU ?

There are TWO concerns, coil compatibility AND UEGO damage with the newer wiring harness, the older ones work great. (vendor changed)

I am working on this with Dave at Water Thunder, we will "scope" the UEGO.

Doug Flynn is also copied.

Lance


Quick Reply: 370 Build



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:00 AM.