Generation IV Internal Engine 2005-2014 LS2 | LS3 | LS7 | L92 | LS9

LS2 Intakes

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-29-2004 | 09:26 PM
  #1  
1BAD-SS's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Regular
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 451
Likes: 0
From: Alabamastan
Default LS2 Intakes

Has anyone heard anything about the release date for the LS2 intakes? I'm really wanting to upgrade my intake at the sametime that I get LT headers for a nice little power boost, just wondering how long of a wait I am possibly looking at. Also, any tech savy guys see any problems with bolting it up to an LS1 in a 00" SS?
Old 06-29-2004 | 09:32 PM
  #2  
cz2898's Avatar
On The Tree
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
From: Littleton, CO
Default

i was wonderung that too, anybody know what kind of gains you could get?
Old 06-29-2004 | 09:38 PM
  #3  
LS1LT1's Avatar
10 Second Club
20 Year Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 9,330
Likes: 0
Question

Seeing that it's a 90mm opening and probably much bigger inside as well wouldn't it make sense that it might be a slight 'overkill' on a stock internal 346 bolt on car much like the 90mm FAST intake is?

This is all assuming that it will fit a current LS1/LS6 motor with no problems that is, this hasn't been totally confirmed yet I don't think.
Old 06-29-2004 | 09:49 PM
  #4  
1BAD-SS's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Regular
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 451
Likes: 0
From: Alabamastan
Default

Originally Posted by LS1LT1
Seeing that it's a 90mm opening and probably much bigger inside as well wouldn't it make sense that it might be a slight 'overkill' on a stock internal 346 bolt on car much like the 90mm FAST intake is?

This is all assuming that it will fit a current LS1/LS6 motor with no problems that is, this hasn't been totally confirmed yet I don't think.

What is this nonsense about overkill??? Just kidding..just looking for a competative alternative to the LSX for comparison purposes before I shell out some more green for my money *****, I mean SS.
Old 06-29-2004 | 09:54 PM
  #5  
1BAD-SS's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Regular
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 451
Likes: 0
From: Alabamastan
Default

On the same point, if I am going to get a new intake for my 00' SS, should I get one without the EGR port? I would like to get rid of the EGR and AIR sys. and get the QTP race style headers and a good dyno tune. Comments, opoinions, and cash donations for this project will be appreciated.
Old 06-29-2004 | 09:55 PM
  #6  
LS1LT1's Avatar
10 Second Club
20 Year Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 9,330
Likes: 0
Lightbulb

Originally Posted by 1BAD-SS
What is this nonsense about overkill??? Just kidding..just looking for a competative alternative to the LSX for comparison purposes before I shell out some more green for my money *****, I mean SS.

I meant overkill as in counterproductive/hurting performance over a 78mm LSX or even a stock LS6 intake.
It's been somewhat accepted that you wouldn't put a 90mm FAST on a stock internals or even 'small cam' only car so I was thinking that might apply to the LS2 as well?
Old 06-29-2004 | 09:58 PM
  #7  
LS1LT1's Avatar
10 Second Club
20 Year Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 9,330
Likes: 0
Thumbs up

Originally Posted by 1BAD-SS
On the same point, if I am going to get a new intake for my 00' SS, should I get one without the EGR port? I would like to get rid of the EGR and AIR sys. and get the QTP race style headers and a good dyno tune. Comments, opoinions, and cash donations for this project will be appreciated.
No cash for you but I agree that you should definitely get rid of the EGR/AIR and of course get the 'non EGR' intake and race style (no EGR/AIR provisions) QTPs, good choice.
Old 06-29-2004 | 10:36 PM
  #8  
Durien's Avatar
11 Second Club
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,400
Likes: 0
From: NY,CT & MA
Default

Originally Posted by 1BAD-SS
On the same point, if I am going to get a new intake for my 00' SS, should I get one without the EGR port? I would like to get rid of the EGR and AIR sys. and get the QTP race style headers and a good dyno tune. Comments, opoinions, and cash donations for this project will be appreciated.

i went all out and got the QTP race headers...i highly recommend them
Old 06-29-2004 | 10:39 PM
  #9  
MARKSZ71's Avatar
11 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,582
Likes: 0
From: bama bitch
Default

well the ls2 does use ls6 heads so i see no reason it wouldnt work im gonna find out soon since we are a dealer
Old 06-29-2004 | 11:26 PM
  #10  
LS1LT1's Avatar
10 Second Club
20 Year Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 9,330
Likes: 0
Lightbulb

Originally Posted by MARKSZ71
well the ls2 does use ls6 heads so i see no reason it wouldnt work im gonna find out soon since we are a dealer
I thought I'd read that they were based on the LS6 heads but weren't exact, I could be wrong though.
The other factor is the front and back of the block/valley cover/timing chain cover areas etc might be different causing a slightly different shape to the bottom of the intake?
Again, just theory and conjecture talking, no facts yet.
Old 06-30-2004 | 12:20 AM
  #11  
CanuckSS's Avatar
TECH Regular
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 472
Likes: 0
From: Ancaster, ON - Where F-bodies are rare!
Default

FWIW I contacted GM parts direct and they said that the part # I gave them does exist but they don't know what it is for or when it will be released. If I had to make an educated guess I would say we should start to see them in a few months. Lets hope it is sooner.
Dave
Old 06-30-2004 | 01:53 AM
  #12  
1BAD-SS's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Regular
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 451
Likes: 0
From: Alabamastan
Default

I would just like to see something that equals or betters the LSX for about the same price. A little competition never hurt any consumer. I would love for it to outperform the LSX and be the same price in a perfect world. If that happened I would probably get the LSX after its price fell a bit.
Old 06-30-2004 | 02:57 AM
  #13  
LS1LT1's Avatar
10 Second Club
20 Year Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 9,330
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by 1BAD-SS
I would love for it to outperform the LSX and be the same price in a perfect world. If that happened I would probably get the LSX after its price fell a bit.
I doubt it will outperform a 90mm LSX but it could be better than the 78mm maybe....I'm betting the LS2 will be cheaper than a 90mm LSX intake for sure, maybe even by as much as $200.00 depending on where ya get it from.
Old 06-30-2004 | 03:05 AM
  #14  
BADFNZ's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,590
Likes: 2
From: Dyess AFB, TX
Default

I don't see how a 90mm is overkill on a 5.7 when it will come stock on a 6.0. The bad thing for us f-body owners is that the C6 throttle body is fly by wire so we can't use it. We will have to dish out the big $ for an aftermarket 90mm TB.

It would be great if it outperformed the 90mm LSX, which is very possible due to the fact that GM has alot more resources to R&D something like this, but I'll wait until I see some real-life performance numbers before I replace my LS6 intake with it.
Old 06-30-2004 | 03:13 AM
  #15  
LS1LT1's Avatar
10 Second Club
20 Year Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 9,330
Likes: 0
Lightbulb

Originally Posted by LS1BlackZ28
I don't see how a 90mm is overkill on a 5.7 when it will come stock on a 6.0.
I'm not implying that it will be too big on any 5.7L, just that it might be too big on a stock internals 5.7L just as the current 90mm LSX is probably too big for a stock internals car...on a heads and cam or even big cam only motor that LS2 might rock though.
You're right about the TB thing, I forgot about that one.
Old 06-30-2004 | 09:33 AM
  #16  
FinalTA's Avatar
Launching!
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 291
Likes: 0
From: Lexington, KY, USA
Default

Originally Posted by LS1BlackZ28
I don't see how a 90mm is overkill on a 5.7 when it will come stock on a 6.0. The bad thing for us f-body owners is that the C6 throttle body is fly by wire so we can't use it. We will have to dish out the big $ for an aftermarket 90mm TB.

It would be great if it outperformed the 90mm LSX, which is very possible due to the fact that GM has alot more resources to R&D something like this, but I'll wait until I see some real-life performance numbers before I replace my LS6 intake with it.
Well, the GTO is not fly by wire and it's getting the LS2
Old 06-30-2004 | 09:54 AM
  #17  
soliari's Avatar
Launching!
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 238
Likes: 0
From: Albuquerque, NM
Default

Originally Posted by FinalTA
Well, the GTO is not fly by wire and it's getting the LS2
Old 06-30-2004 | 10:08 AM
  #18  
'02 SLP#686's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,647
Likes: 0
From: Leominster, MA
Default

Unless you are running power adders or a bigger than stock cube motor - the stock LS6 will run just as hard as the LSX! Proven in Popular Hotrodding! It was like a 3HP gain??? For $800??? No way! But with you having the LS1 intake - it might be justified, but going bigger than the 78mm would only hurt performance.
Old 06-30-2004 | 10:51 AM
  #19  
WS6snake-eater's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,839
Likes: 0
From: La Porte, TX
Default

Will the new LS2 equiped cars be coming with 90mm MAFs also???? I just don't see the point of a bigger intake and TB, if you don't have a MAF to match it. Surely GM thought about this too.
Old 06-30-2004 | 11:57 AM
  #20  
70T/A400's Avatar
Launching!
20 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 217
Likes: 43
From: Clarkston, MI
Default

Yes, along with the LS2 intake and 90 mm throttle body, we must also have a 90 mm MAF and a lid and filter to accomodate the larger openings. Hopefully, the aftermarket will realize this for our beloved F-cars.


Quick Reply: LS2 Intakes



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:24 AM.