Generation IV Internal Engine 2005-2014 LS2 | LS3 | LS7 | L92 | LS9

Check out the NEWEST Summit Pro LS Cams

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-15-2023, 10:57 AM
  #321  
TECH Senior Member
 
G Atsma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Central Cal.
Posts: 21,075
Received 3,090 Likes on 2,406 Posts
Default

Bill VA- If you want to keep low end power, you do NOT want to use that manifold. Runners are too short for low end response.
Keep the LS3 manifold. Form should always follow function. You drive with the hood closed with the engine running.
Either "Looks great but runs doggy", or "Runs great and looks OK".
Your choice....
Old 12-15-2023, 12:29 PM
  #322  
Registered User
 
Bill_VA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2023
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by G Atsma
Runners are too short for low end response.
Thanks. So what about a mid-rise intake like that? The cool intake comparison video that Richard Holdener did was informative, but the dyno results were for 3000rpm and above. Too bad he didn't start down lower to give a better picture.
Old 12-15-2023, 12:46 PM
  #323  
TECH Senior Member
 
G Atsma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Central Cal.
Posts: 21,075
Received 3,090 Likes on 2,406 Posts
Default

Long story short, the LS3 manifold is best all-around for flexibility.
Only the FAST makes a SLIGHT difference and stays strong on the low end.
Old 12-15-2023, 12:59 PM
  #324  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
bthomas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Posts: 385
Received 141 Likes on 100 Posts
Default

And a rod mod ls3 intake will make more hp and tq than the fast102 to 6200rpm.


Old 12-15-2023, 01:24 PM
  #325  
LS1Tech Sponsor
Thread Starter
 
Summitracing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Ohio, Georgia, Nevada, Texas
Posts: 2,000
Received 1,187 Likes on 647 Posts

Default

Folks,

We enjoy this discussion about the intakes but it's moved away from the Pro LS cams this thread is about. @Bill_VA feel free to create your own thread on the forum for the community to discuss. We'll likely join in on the conversation there.
__________________


800-230-3030
www.SummitRacing.com
The following 2 users liked this post by Summitracing:
Che70velle (12-15-2023), G Atsma (12-15-2023)
Old 12-15-2023, 01:28 PM
  #326  
Registered User
 
Bill_VA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2023
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Looks like the "rod mod" isn't really all that great.
Old 12-15-2023, 01:28 PM
  #327  
Registered User
 
Bill_VA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2023
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Summitracing
Folks,

We enjoy this discussion about the intakes but it's moved away from the Pro LS cams this thread is about. @Bill_VA feel free to create your own thread on the forum for the community to discuss. We'll likely join in on the conversation there.
You're right, sorry to hijack the thread.
The following users liked this post:
G Atsma (12-15-2023)
Old 03-15-2024, 08:34 AM
  #328  
Teching In
 
Escalado's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2023
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Summitracing




Sorry for the late reply. We 100% agree with @68Formula that the SUM-8727R1 would be the way to go focusing on low-end hp/tq. With its -9* intake valve opening you're not going to have a choppy idle. If you wanted a cam that had an idle to it you'll have to compromise a bit on where you want the power. If you don't mind losing some off-idle torque to get your "aggressive sounding idle" take a look at the SUM-8728R1. It will make up for it and then some come 2,000 rpm on up. The Intake Valve Closing is basically what sets the powerband of a cam. The earlier we close the intake valve after bottom dead center the earlier the powerband starts and ends. The 8727R1 has a 29* IVC @.050" lift. Whereas the 8728R1 has a 33* IVC @.050" lift. The 8728R1 will work just fine with your 3:73 gears and stock converter.


With the 8728R1 you will need to move up to .600" lift beehives. You'll also want upgraded pushrods. With the 8728R1, we typically see a 7.400" or 7.425" pushrod used. Things can vary so we always recommend measuring for pushrod length before purchasing pushrods. If you don't already have a pushrod length checker we offer the Trickflow TFS-9501. For pushrods, we recommend a minimum of a 5/16" Chromoly pushrod with a .080" wall. You can typically find a set of 16 for around $100. From there you can get into a thicker wall or larger diameter pushrod. For excellent stability and strength check out our 11/32" HDR pushrods with a .120" wall. These have 25% less stress and 28% less deflection than a typical 5/16" x .080" wall Chromoly pushrod.
okay! So far ive installed the following

Volante dual scoop CAI
BBK 1-3/4” stainless steel headers with 3” off road y
magnaflow y pipe to flow master super 44 dual 2.5” exit
upgraded my 8.6” diff with helical locker and complete rebuild 3.73 geared
all new fuel lines, fuel pump, brake lines etc
swapped to the 12212156 2002 O/S
efans
dual batteries
145 amp alternator
also PKE remote start (cause why not)
multitudes of other body/interior mods/upgrades, truck is 100% rust free and painted satin black

im going to be swapping in an L33 in place of my LM7 (already own it, cheaper than buying a 6L)
What cam would be best? Still the 8728? I feel like the stated power band would work great still. Thoughts?

Also, what kind of ballpark HP/TQ numbers should I expect with this set up?

THANK YOU in advance

EDIT-I’m looking for the biggest power without having to do anything internal other than rods and springs, I don’t mind doing a converter as I’m going to swap a 4l80e when I do the cam swap, but I’m still going to be towing upwards of 7000lb so I need to keep that in mind

SIDENOTE- I’m going to do a 4l80e swap afterwards, but I need to swap the engine right away (broke 5 exhaust studs when installing headers, F**k my life lol. Since I need to basically pull the motor to fix, may as well swap it)




Last edited by Escalado; 03-15-2024 at 08:50 AM.
Old 03-15-2024, 01:37 PM
  #329  
LS1Tech Sponsor
Thread Starter
 
Summitracing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Ohio, Georgia, Nevada, Texas
Posts: 2,000
Received 1,187 Likes on 647 Posts

Default

@Escalado,

Thanks for checking back in on the thread. The SUM-8728R1 will be an even better fit now with the L33. It will like the added compression and better heads. Plus, you've freed up the exhaust more which will help squeeze out more power and torque. As long as the L33 is in good condition you don't need to do anything internally to use the 8728R1. Go with the .600" lift beehives and follow our pushrod recommendation we previously mentioned. There's no way to 100% know a hp/tq gain without a dyno test before and after. However, with the L33, 8728R1, your bolt-ons, and a good custom tune, we could see this being in the 300+ rwhp range and 315+ rwtq range.

The 8728R1 will work just fine with your 3.73 gears and a stock converter. It would benefit from a 2,500+ stall converter but it's not required. With a stall converter, we would highly recommend an auxiliary transmission cooler.
__________________


800-230-3030
www.SummitRacing.com
The following users liked this post:
68Formula (03-16-2024)
Old 04-08-2024, 09:16 AM
  #330  
Abs
Staging Lane
 
Abs's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2023
Location: Franconia, PA
Posts: 55
Received 18 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by DualQuadDave
You guys have such a thing as a Stage 3 High Lift Truck cam? I am doing a iron 6.2 gen 3 motor/fully ported 243 heads for a customer now, going in a H2 Hummer. I like your truck cams, but was wanting slightly bigger than your Stage 2 considering it's going in a 6.2 w/ 3000rpm converter. LMK what you think.
I was even considering the Ghost cam, as well.
I've also been thinking that another high lift truck cam or a dedicated stage 1 n/a cam could really be helpful. Something similar to the 8715 ghost cam but with a bit of a tighter lsa to help with torque down low. Maybe a 222/230, .600, .600 on a 112 which has 2 degrees of overlap. Something in that ballpark.

Personally I am considering a cam for my 5.7L ls1 GTO with an m6, ls6 intake, and 3.42 gears. I have shorty headers, high flow mids and a magnaflow CB with x pipe. The exhaust is 2.5" from front to back. I also have an over the radiator air intake. I would likely do a cam only swap in the short term and keep my 241 heads, but down the line, I might upgrade to ported 243 heads and long tube headers. I spend 90+% of my driving under 3000 rpms and I really liked the results of the 8720 in holdeners stage 2 turbo video, but all of his tests were on a 4.8L. I can't help but wonder if the results would change on a 5.7L and above. That test made the 8706 look almost worthless as the 8720 out performed it everywhere except the very top end.

Is there any chance @Summitracing was considering a cam similar to the one I mentioned any time soon? I saw posts back in 2019 where you guys talked about some custom cams, but I didn't know if you guys still did them. If not, do you think the 8720 would make sense for me?

Last edited by Abs; 04-09-2024 at 01:24 PM.
Old 04-11-2024, 12:00 PM
  #331  
LS1Tech Sponsor
Thread Starter
 
Summitracing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Ohio, Georgia, Nevada, Texas
Posts: 2,000
Received 1,187 Likes on 647 Posts

Default

@Abs,

Thanks for checking in on the thread. The cam you're describing is the SUM-8713R1 .550/.550, 222/232, 112+5 with 3* of overlap but with .600" lift instead of .550". There isn't a plan for a high-lift version of the 8713R1 anytime soon. You could go with the 8713R1 and get what you're after. You might be down 5-10 hp/tq at most being .550" vs. .600". If we're talking about a racecar dependent to put food on the table don't give up any hp/tq. However, that doesn't sound like that's the case here. Plus you could go with our budget-friendly LS6 Style springs.

Regarding the SUM-8715R1 with specs of .600/.575, 222/234, 115+3 with -2* of overlap. It was designed with a little later intake valve closing for top-end power. You could get our adjustable upper timing gear to advance the cam timing 2-4* bringing the powerband down more in your desired range. With the 8715R1 you would need our .600" lift beehives.

If an adjustable upper timing gear doesn't interest you look at the SUM-8720R1 you mentioned. Specs are .600/.600, 218/227, 112+2 with -1* of overlap. Spec'd similar to the GM "Hot Cam" but with more aggressive yet safe lobes. We spec'd it with .600" lift to get that extra 5-10 hp/tq across the range. It would work great in a stockish 5.7 LS1 with an M6. Would you make more peak hp/tq with the 8715R1 you sure would. That brings us back to our comment about the use of this combo. The 8720R1 would come close to the 8715R1 at peak but be better on the low-end with its earlier IVC and later EVO. With what you're describing you're after we think this might be the way to go. It'll have a nice steady lope but be easy to tune and live with. You'll have a nice wide powerband making it a joy to row through the gears if you feel sporty. Pair it with our .600" lift beehives and it will be plenty happy!

This gives you three options. If you'd like to go down a rabbit hole of how we look at cams check out this article and our cam timing calculator.
__________________


800-230-3030
www.SummitRacing.com
The following 3 users liked this post by Summitracing:
68Formula (04-12-2024), Abs (04-11-2024), Woodylyf767 (05-17-2024)
Old 04-11-2024, 12:08 PM
  #332  
Abs
Staging Lane
 
Abs's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2023
Location: Franconia, PA
Posts: 55
Received 18 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Summitracing
@Abs,

Thanks for checking in on the thread. The cam you're describing is the SUM-8713R1 .550/.550, 222/232, 112+5 with 3* of overlap but with .600" lift instead of .550". There isn't a plan for a high-lift version of the 8713R1 anytime soon. You could go with the 8713R1 and get what you're after. You might be down 5-10 hp/tq at most being .550" vs. .600". If we're talking about a racecar dependent to put food on the table don't give up any hp/tq. However, that doesn't sound like that's the case here. Plus you could go with our budget-friendly LS6 Style springs.

Regarding the SUM-8715R1 with specs of .600/.575, 222/234, 115+3 with -2* of overlap. It was designed with a little later intake valve closing for top-end power. You could get our adjustable upper timing gear to advance the cam timing 2-4* bringing the powerband down more in your desired range. With the 8715R1 you would need our .600" lift beehives.

If an adjustable upper timing gear doesn't interest you look at the SUM-8720R1 you mentioned. Specs are .600/.600, 218/227, 112+2 with -1* of overlap. Spec'd similar to the GM "Hot Cam" but with more aggressive yet safe lobes. We spec'd it with .600" lift to get that extra 5-10 hp/tq across the range. It would work great in a stockish 5.7 LS1 with an M6. Would you make more peak hp/tq with the 8715R1 you sure would. That brings us back to our comment about the use of this combo. The 8720R1 would come close to the 8715R1 at peak but be better on the low-end with its earlier IVC and later EVO. With what you're describing you're after we think this might be the way to go. It'll have a nice steady lope but be easy to tune and live with. You'll have a nice wide powerband making it a joy to row through the gears if you feel sporty. Pair it with our .600" lift beehives and it will be plenty happy!

This gives you three options. If you'd like to go down a rabbit hole of how we look at cams check out this article and our cam timing calculator.
this was perfect, thank you!
The following users liked this post:
Summitracing (04-11-2024)
Old 04-12-2024, 07:38 AM
  #333  
12 Second Club
 
Utinator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 918
Likes: 0
Received 172 Likes on 127 Posts
Default

Does Summit plan on designing stroker cams? It seems they have everything else. The big gun cams are close to other stroker cam specs, but they aren’t advertised as stroker cams.
Old 04-12-2024, 11:31 AM
  #334  
LS1Tech Sponsor
Thread Starter
 
Summitracing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Ohio, Georgia, Nevada, Texas
Posts: 2,000
Received 1,187 Likes on 647 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Utinator
Does Summit plan on designing stroker cams? It seems they have everything else. The big gun cams are close to other stroker cam specs, but they aren’t advertised as stroker cams.
Yes we didn’t label them as strokers because many will still choose them for high winding standard stroke engines. The main difference is we capped the stage 4’s to work with factory flat tops. The Big Guns require a flycut or aftermarket piston.
__________________


800-230-3030
www.SummitRacing.com
Old 04-14-2024, 04:43 PM
  #335  
7 Second Club
 
ls3fox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 670
Received 118 Likes on 73 Posts
Default

I have a 2015 2500 6.0 with a 6l90 it's all stock I don't plan on doing an exhuast as I don't want the noise was looking to do a cam swap was thinking about your 8728 cam do you think it would be a good fit
The following users liked this post:
Abs (04-14-2024)
Old 04-14-2024, 07:47 PM
  #336  
TECH Enthusiast
 
68Formula's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 666
Received 350 Likes on 239 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ls3fox
I have a 2015 2500 6.0 with a 6l90 it's all stock I don't plan on doing an exhuast as I don't want the noise was looking to do a cam swap was thinking about your 8728 cam do you think it would be a good fit
A 2015 has direct injection, so the camshaft needs to have the lobe that drives the high pressure pump. The Summit LS series are designed to fit previous generation engines without fuel lobes.
Old 04-14-2024, 08:01 PM
  #337  
7 Second Club
 
ls3fox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 670
Received 118 Likes on 73 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 68Formula
A 2015 has direct injection, so the camshaft needs to have the lobe that drives the high pressure pump. The Summit LS series are designed to fit previous generation engines without fuel lobes.
No it's a 2500 with an l96 6.0 no direct injection
The following 2 users liked this post by ls3fox:
68Formula (04-14-2024), DualQuadDave (04-15-2024)
Old 04-14-2024, 09:43 PM
  #338  
ModSquad
iTrader: (6)
 
Che70velle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Dawsonville Ga.
Posts: 6,443
Received 3,495 Likes on 2,154 Posts

Default

I can top that one…I bought a brand new 2020 2500 GMC savanah work van for the fleet. Got it home expecting to pop the hood and see the LT engine under there…nope. It’s got the last of the LS engines in it. It’s a 6 liter van. I was a little bummed for just a second.
The following 3 users liked this post by Che70velle:
68Formula (04-14-2024), DualQuadDave (04-15-2024), Mr. Black (04-14-2024)
Old 04-16-2024, 11:36 AM
  #339  
LS1Tech Sponsor
Thread Starter
 
Summitracing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Ohio, Georgia, Nevada, Texas
Posts: 2,000
Received 1,187 Likes on 647 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ls3fox
I have a 2015 2500 6.0 with a 6l90 it's all stock I don't plan on doing an exhuast as I don't want the noise was looking to do a cam swap was thinking about your 8728 cam do you think it would be a good fit
Thanks for checking in on the thread for a cam recommendation. The SUM-8728R1 would be a good fit for a 2500 with the 6.0. Specs on it are .600/.585, 212/218, 110+3 with -5* of overlap. It'll have a steady lope and will require custom tuning. The 8728R1 will make great torque from 2,000 on up. It'll pull well to 6,500+ with .600" lift beehives. The 8728R1 will work with a stock exhaust and stock torque converter.

If you wanted to dial it back a bit the SUM-8719R1 would also be a good choice. Specs on it are .550/.550, 209/217, 112+1 with -11* of overlap. It'll dial the idle note down with its -7* intake valve opening VS. -1* for the 8728R1. This will have good torque off-idle with a strong mid-range and good top-end power. You can run it out to 6,500+ with budget-friendly LS6-style springs. This will also work with a stock exhaust and stock torque converter.

Either would be a good fit for a daily driver 3/4 ton truck with a 6.0. No matter the aftermarket 3-bolt cam you go with you'll need a VVT-Delete Kit.

Let us know if we can be of any further assistance. We'll be happy to help!
__________________


800-230-3030
www.SummitRacing.com
Old 04-16-2024, 01:45 PM
  #340  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (13)
 
LS1Formulation's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Grand Rapids, Michigan
Posts: 2,682
Received 552 Likes on 438 Posts

Default

Would the 8719 cam be usable without tuning? And would I be able to use it with a set of low mileage LS3 springs?
Truck is a 2006 2500 HD with a 6.0. Want to keep everything else stock.


Quick Reply: Check out the NEWEST Summit Pro LS Cams



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:42 AM.