Generation IV Internal Engine 2005-2014 LS2 | LS3 | LS7 | L92 | LS9

Need blower CAM grind recommendations

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-24-2019, 11:17 AM
  #61  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (26)
 
ddnspider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: FL
Posts: 14,597
Received 1,736 Likes on 1,297 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by bortous
I agree. He will lose boost but will make more power. It's a give an take. Having 0 degrees of overlap means no loss of boost but you sacrifice power.
The OP was aware of this and wanted options.
He received them, asked questions and settled on the biggest camshaft knowing what to expect.
14 degrees of overlap will drive quite well in a 427 with cathedral heads with a good tune.
This is not a worry.
Have you built a centrifugal blower engine before? Boost IS power on this setup. They make max power at max RPM, thats the point of them. He will not make as much power.
Old 06-24-2019, 11:18 AM
  #62  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
 
AndyTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 347
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ddnspider
Have you built a centrifugal blower engine before? Boost IS power on this setup. They make max power at max RPM, thats the point of them. He will not make as much power.
Read my post above.

*Edit:

oh you did - just now saw it ;-)
Old 06-24-2019, 11:20 AM
  #63  
Super Hulk Smash
iTrader: (7)
 
JakeFusion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Pace, FL
Posts: 11,255
Received 137 Likes on 114 Posts

Default

It's not technically correct. You make more power with more overlap. Period. The boost levels go down. But your HP per lbs of boost goes up.

It's why a cam takes 2-3lbs off a blower combo and heads another 2-3lbs. But yet the HP goes up... 60HP and 40HP, respectively and typically.

So you add 100HP and lose 5lbs of boost. Sounds good to me. Then you pulley down to get the boost back and you end up adding quite a lot of power overall (if the blower has RPM for it). I'd rather not lift the heads. And an F1 blower moves enough air you don't need a lot of boost to make a lot of power on a 427.
The following users liked this post:
AndyTA (06-24-2019)
Old 06-24-2019, 11:20 AM
  #64  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
 
AndyTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 347
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ddnspider
I guess I was looking at some other factors. You can make a car sound like whatever you want with tuning.....I can make a stock cam lope. The other point is that you'll have to run a smaller pulley to achieve the same amount of boost of a cam with lesser overlap, making it more prone to belt slip. Sure, you can make 800whp at a given boost with this cam. What happens if you could have made 900whp at the same boost with a cam that had less overlap? Either way, was just confirming the setup when I glanced through the thread. It's your build, enjoy it!
Yup, all true. Thank you!! I absolutely plan to enjoy it.
This will be a street duty daily driven car. I'm not running DR's unless I happen to take it to the strip.

Planting 800whp on the streets is no easy task - there comes a point (as you know) where more power is simply useless when the tires can't take any more.
Old 06-24-2019, 11:22 AM
  #65  
TECH Addict
 
bortous's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,898
Received 461 Likes on 358 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ddnspider
Have you built a centrifugal blower engine before? Boost IS power on this setup. They make max power at max RPM, thats the point of them. He will not make as much power.
Yes you are right that the centrifugal blowers continue making power to max rpm.
This is where this camshaft will shine, in the top end.
Even with losing some boost the power will be certainly be there, This will rev all the way out.
Just wait and see.
The following users liked this post:
AndyTA (06-24-2019)
Old 06-24-2019, 11:23 AM
  #66  
Moderator
iTrader: (4)
 
Darth_V8r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: My own internal universe
Posts: 10,446
Received 1,836 Likes on 1,145 Posts
Default

IDK if it is rocket surgery. Whatever makes more power NA also makes more power boosted. What if the earths atmospheric pressure was to double (equal to 14psi boost) .... would you pick heads and cam differently for NA? likely not.
Old 06-24-2019, 11:23 AM
  #67  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (26)
 
ddnspider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: FL
Posts: 14,597
Received 1,736 Likes on 1,297 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by JakeFusion
It's not technically correct. You make more power with more overlap. Period. The boost levels go down. But your HP per lbs of boost goes up.

It's why a cam takes 2-3lbs off a blower combo and heads another 2-3lbs. But yet the HP goes up... 60HP and 40HP, respectively and typically.

So you add 100HP and lose 5lbs of boost. Sounds good to me. Then you pulley down to get the boost back and you end up adding quite a lot of power overall (if the blower has RPM for it).
You are completely ignoring things like impeller speed limitations as well as pulley size limitations and belt slip. Boost is power on a centrifugal setup and you won't just go gaining power because of overlap when you're loosing boost. When 3 psi can be 100 whp boost matters. By your rule of thumb run 25* of overlap and make 0 psi and the most power.
Old 06-24-2019, 11:24 AM
  #68  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (26)
 
ddnspider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: FL
Posts: 14,597
Received 1,736 Likes on 1,297 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Darth_V8r
IDK if it is rocket surgery. Whatever makes more power NA also makes more power boosted. What if the earths atmospheric pressure was to double (equal to 14psi boost) .... would you pick heads and cam differently for NA? likely not.
Actually you do pick heads and cam differently for boost vs. NA....Some crazy thing about air being forced in vs. drawn in that changes stuff
Old 06-24-2019, 11:28 AM
  #69  
Super Hulk Smash
iTrader: (7)
 
JakeFusion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Pace, FL
Posts: 11,255
Received 137 Likes on 114 Posts

Default

You didn't even read what I said. You gain efficiency with overlap (it's still an airpump). You can make back up the boost by pulleying down (if you can--which I said) or you simply make more power at a lower boost level (also what I said). The blower is going to do what the blower is going to do. They are rated for CFM... you can't push a D1SC to 1200rwhp. So, you size the blower to the engine and application. You then size the cam and heads to the RPM range and intended usage. This isn't just pick **** and ignore the trade-offs.

Point remains--you can always add boost. But at some point you get diminishing returns. Blower efficiency. Intake charge. Belt slip. All those come into play. But you can create a more efficient airpump to make better use of the CFM being generated by the blower. Ultimately, I wouldn't give two ***** about the boost level. I care about getting to the power level without the blower turning into a hot air dryer.
Old 06-24-2019, 11:33 AM
  #70  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (26)
 
ddnspider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: FL
Posts: 14,597
Received 1,736 Likes on 1,297 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by JakeFusion
You didn't even read what I said. You gain efficiency with overlap (it's still an airpump). You can make back up the boost by pulleying down (if you can--which I said) or you simply make more power at a lower boost level (also what I said). The blower is going to do what the blower is going to do. They are rated for CFM... you can't push a D1SC to 1200rwhp. So, you size the blower to the engine and application. You then size the cam and heads to the RPM range and intended usage. This isn't just pick **** and ignore the trade-offs.

Point remains--you can always add boost. But at some point you get diminishing returns. Blower efficiency. Intake charge. Belt slip. All those come into play. But you can create a more efficient airpump to make better use of the CFM being generated by the blower. Ultimately, I wouldn't give two ***** about the boost level. I care about getting to the power level without the blower turning into a hot air dryer.
Actually I did read your post, I just don't agree with it including gaining efficiency with overlap. You don't have the same reflected wave signals that are used to draw in the intake air during overlap on an NA motor. It is not the same and you do not cam a boosted car the same way you do an NA setup. Sites like Dragzine and Hotrod would agree with me.
Old 06-24-2019, 11:35 AM
  #71  
Super Hulk Smash
iTrader: (7)
 
JakeFusion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Pace, FL
Posts: 11,255
Received 137 Likes on 114 Posts

Default

Except everyone who adds a bigger cam and makes more power agree with me?
Old 06-24-2019, 11:42 AM
  #72  
TECH Addict
 
bortous's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,898
Received 461 Likes on 358 Posts

Default

It is a fact that you will make more power with a bigger camshaft regardless if you are boosted or not.
It is also a fact that overlap will bleed off some boost.
As I stated earlier 14 degrees of overlap in a 427 is perfectly fine.
Overlap makes an engine more efficient in the higher rpm's also.
Remember ddn, the OP wanted this and it will work.
What do you think of the 6 degree overlap camshaft for this build then?
Old 06-24-2019, 11:42 AM
  #73  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (26)
 
ddnspider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: FL
Posts: 14,597
Received 1,736 Likes on 1,297 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by JakeFusion
Except everyone who adds a bigger cam and makes more power agree with me?
More duration or just more overlap? More duration.....completely believable. You're taking larger gulps of air. Same duration and just more overlap, no. I'm talking strictly overlap comparisons here. if you want to compare 2 completely different cams thats not apples to apples.
Old 06-24-2019, 11:46 AM
  #74  
TECH Addict
 
bortous's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,898
Received 461 Likes on 358 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ddnspider
More duration or just more overlap? More duration.....completely believable. You're taking larger gulps of air. Same duration and just more overlap, no. I'm talking strictly overlap comparisons here. if you want to compare 2 completely different cams thats not apples to apples.
DDN, go to gen IV external and respond to my thread about forced induction for my engine.
I would like to read your opinion and advice
Old 06-24-2019, 12:01 PM
  #75  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (26)
 
ddnspider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: FL
Posts: 14,597
Received 1,736 Likes on 1,297 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by bortous
DDN, go to gen IV external and respond to my thread about forced induction for my engine.
I would like to read your opinion and advice
Honestly, it is very apparent to me from this thread that there is very little to gain from going back and forth. I wasn't going to post up initially at all but wanted to confirm I read the thread correctly. I should have left it at that and not replied. I've done enough boosted setups and researched input from people like Martin Smallwood and Comp and others that I am comfortable with my chosen ideas of spec'd a cam for boost. Not sure how many others in here have built boosted setups before and spec'd cams, but they obviously have their own ideas. To each their own and YMMV. I'll stick to the boosted section
Old 06-24-2019, 12:10 PM
  #76  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
 
AndyTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 347
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ddnspider
Honestly, it is very apparent to me from this thread that there is very little to gain from going back and forth. I wasn't going to post up initially at all but wanted to confirm I read the thread correctly. I should have left it at that and not replied. I've done enough boosted setups and researched input from people like Martin Smallwood and Comp and others that I am comfortable with my chosen ideas of spec'd a cam for boost. Not sure how many others in here have built boosted setups before and spec'd cams, but they obviously have their own ideas. To each their own and YMMV. I'll stick to the boosted section
Oh no, I'm glad you did. I welcome all view points here on my build.

I'm happy with my choices/selections at the end of the day. Lets be honest, this is a debate that will never end.
Old 06-24-2019, 12:10 PM
  #77  
TECH Addict
 
bortous's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,898
Received 461 Likes on 358 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ddnspider
Honestly, it is very apparent to me from this thread that there is very little to gain from going back and forth. I wasn't going to post up initially at all but wanted to confirm I read the thread correctly. I should have left it at that and not replied. I've done enough boosted setups and researched input from people like Martin Smallwood and Comp and others that I am comfortable with my chosen ideas of spec'd a cam for boost. Not sure how many others in here have built boosted setups before and spec'd cams, but they obviously have their own ideas. To each their own and YMMV. I'll stick to the boosted section
That's ok.
Thanks for letting us know that we are a bunch of ignorant dumb asses.
Why don't you list a camshaft specification for the OP's combination in this thread and let us see.
I sure want to.
Old 06-24-2019, 12:38 PM
  #78  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (26)
 
ddnspider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: FL
Posts: 14,597
Received 1,736 Likes on 1,297 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by AndyTA
Oh no, I'm glad you did. I welcome all view points here on my build.

I'm happy with my choices/selections at the end of the day. Lets be honest, this is a debate that will never end.
I'm sure your engine is going to be a beast, have fun with it!


Originally Posted by bortous
That's ok.
Thanks for letting us know that we are a bunch of ignorant dumb asses.
Why don't you list a camshaft specification for the OP's combination in this thread and let us see.
I sure want to.
I'm not sure why you would think that. Like I said, everyone has their own ideas and your mileage may vary. If you've built boosted cars and had good success with your cam choices, more power to you
Old 06-24-2019, 12:43 PM
  #79  
TECH Addict
 
bortous's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,898
Received 461 Likes on 358 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ddnspider
I'm sure your engine is going to be a beast, have fun with it!



I'm not sure why you would think that. Like I said, everyone has their own ideas and your mileage may vary. If you've built boosted cars and had good success with your cam choices, more power to you
Fair enough.
Please list an appropriate camshaft specification for the OP please.
Explain why you chose the specs.
Maybe I could learn a thing or two.
Old 06-24-2019, 12:56 PM
  #80  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (26)
 
ddnspider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: FL
Posts: 14,597
Received 1,736 Likes on 1,297 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by bortous
Fair enough.
Please list an appropriate camshaft specification for the OP please.
Explain why you chose the specs.
Maybe I could learn a thing or two.
I typically prefer to cam down and let the boost do the work. On a setup like OP's, something smaller like a 236/246 117. I actually went back after writing this and looked at your original cam spec's and we were pretty close to each other!


Quick Reply: Need blower CAM grind recommendations



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:08 PM.