Cam Motion LLSR
#1
Cam Motion LLSR
Just wondering if anyone here has ran this cam http://www.cammotion.com/camshafts/r...ectangle-port/ and what sort of results you got with it, engine is going to be a 6.2 ls3 with high compression 12.5:1 + on e85, ported ls3 heads, ported vic jr intake w/carb
#2
Will make about 650-660 flywheel horsepower with a victor jr.
Ran a SBE LS3 with 10.4:1 compression, 239/251 on 110 hydraulic cam and made about 640.
Dyno'd our 415 with a 243/257 hydraulic on 110 cam and made 663 hp through a victor jr, but the intake is restricting power production above 6500. I think a shorter stroke LS3 will still make similar power, especially with the gains of the extra compression and being a solid roller.
Ran a SBE LS3 with 10.4:1 compression, 239/251 on 110 hydraulic cam and made about 640.
Dyno'd our 415 with a 243/257 hydraulic on 110 cam and made 663 hp through a victor jr, but the intake is restricting power production above 6500. I think a shorter stroke LS3 will still make similar power, especially with the gains of the extra compression and being a solid roller.
The following users liked this post:
JezzaE (08-04-2019)
#4
Will make about 650-660 flywheel horsepower with a victor jr.
Ran a SBE LS3 with 10.4:1 compression, 239/251 on 110 hydraulic cam and made about 640.
Dyno'd our 415 with a 243/257 hydraulic on 110 cam and made 663 hp through a victor jr, but the intake is restricting power production above 6500. I think a shorter stroke LS3 will still make similar power, especially with the gains of the extra compression and being a solid roller.
Ran a SBE LS3 with 10.4:1 compression, 239/251 on 110 hydraulic cam and made about 640.
Dyno'd our 415 with a 243/257 hydraulic on 110 cam and made 663 hp through a victor jr, but the intake is restricting power production above 6500. I think a shorter stroke LS3 will still make similar power, especially with the gains of the extra compression and being a solid roller.