Another max bore question
#21
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Guys who do crazy stuff like this have a few things in common
Free parts
Don't care cause it's more race driven..Fill the block
Build it as a test to see knowing there maybe another engine needed while some drive for many miles.
I ask what gain will be seen from the stock bore of .060 to .070 to the bore size Wanted at? A example of a 4.0030 bore Vs a 4.080 bore size would net around let's say 10 hp.
.080 + 10hp
.090 + 13 to 15hp
.100 +20hp
25 to 50+ fwhp over
.125 to 4.185 bore
Quick trick is Ole math
add a little stroke to Make up any differences 4.080 to 4.125 crank with a .070 bore will make hp. Horsepower = Torque x RPM / 5,252.
a Spare gen4 LQ4 block block that would like sonic testing with a larger CCW 4.125 crank... that's a rubbish idea @ this point. But a good idea using 6.00 rods for a better piston pin. The truth is no matter what sonic testing is needed
Set a realistic goal on hp and rpm band no need to Max out Anything.
Free parts
Don't care cause it's more race driven..Fill the block
Build it as a test to see knowing there maybe another engine needed while some drive for many miles.
I ask what gain will be seen from the stock bore of .060 to .070 to the bore size Wanted at? A example of a 4.0030 bore Vs a 4.080 bore size would net around let's say 10 hp.
.080 + 10hp
.090 + 13 to 15hp
.100 +20hp
25 to 50+ fwhp over
.125 to 4.185 bore
Quick trick is Ole math
add a little stroke to Make up any differences 4.080 to 4.125 crank with a .070 bore will make hp. Horsepower = Torque x RPM / 5,252.
a Spare gen4 LQ4 block block that would like sonic testing with a larger CCW 4.125 crank... that's a rubbish idea @ this point. But a good idea using 6.00 rods for a better piston pin. The truth is no matter what sonic testing is needed
Set a realistic goal on hp and rpm band no need to Max out Anything.
#22
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
https://sdparts.com/i-24498593-genui...rankshaft.html
3.860 stroke
6.250 rod
1.050 piston pin height aka* 4.065 to .075 bore pistons for a 4.125 crank
Equals to having a 0 deck height at 9.230
Ask me how do I know this? what I do for fun. The pistons came from me looking over a 4.125 crank using a 4.065 to .075 over bore.
Idk about the K1 4.125 crank for $800 smakers. Lol.
compression would Stay the same @ (11.5 to 13.2) depending on which manufacturer used for pistons for a .060 to .075 bore and 4.125 crank.
JE has a few also Mahle, Carrillo, Weisco, Diamond
Trust me I've spec'ed a 426 to 424 CID sb all using a 4.125 crank looking for the perfect compression for pump gas. Quick build idea bored.
3.860 stroke
6.250 rod
1.050 piston pin height aka* 4.065 to .075 bore pistons for a 4.125 crank
Equals to having a 0 deck height at 9.230
Ask me how do I know this? what I do for fun. The pistons came from me looking over a 4.125 crank using a 4.065 to .075 over bore.
Idk about the K1 4.125 crank for $800 smakers. Lol.
compression would Stay the same @ (11.5 to 13.2) depending on which manufacturer used for pistons for a .060 to .075 bore and 4.125 crank.
JE has a few also Mahle, Carrillo, Weisco, Diamond
Trust me I've spec'ed a 426 to 424 CID sb all using a 4.125 crank looking for the perfect compression for pump gas. Quick build idea bored.
Last edited by Corona; 11-22-2021 at 01:43 AM.
#23
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Sounds about right
That's pretty insane with .080 on an LS3. Appreciate the info.
I like to crunch numbers for various bore & stroke combinations as well. Way cheaper to build them on paper
I collected oo many spare parts over the years: my old LS1 engine, a LS6 block, a LS2 block & an ERL sleeved 5.3 block etc. It would make my day if that LS6 sonic checked it could go 4 inch.
![Happy](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_stretch.gif)
I like to crunch numbers for various bore & stroke combinations as well. Way cheaper to build them on paper
![Happy](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_stretch.gif)
The following 2 users liked this post by Mavn:
99 Black Bird T/A (11-22-2021), LCBE (11-22-2021)
#25
12 Second Club
Thread Starter
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
My dad had a 400 SBC in his Gen-2 Camaro when he was racing dirt tracks. I always thought it would be cool to have one in my Camaro, but I like fuel injection and aluminum blocks too much. lol. I like the idea of having a non-stock LS displacement size with an LS motor. For example, I found ways to make a 392 cid (Hemi), 396 cid (BBC), and even a 302 cid (SBF) with after-market parts. If an LS2 can be bored more than .030" over, then I think a 400 cid (SBC) is possible. Of course, there are more options when you re-sleeve, but these sizes are achievable without re-sleeving.
Ok, here's a serious question for the masses: If you have a V-8 engine with a 4.040" bore, and a 3.9" stroke, what cid would you call it?
Ok, here's a serious question for the masses: If you have a V-8 engine with a 4.040" bore, and a 3.9" stroke, what cid would you call it?
The following users liked this post:
Corona (11-22-2021)
#27
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
the 15 hp isn't worth it. Put a S/R on your 408 and you could have 8 sec hp. Cam specific. You have more compression than Flyin but 8 cubic inches small = about the same hp Cam specific.
#28
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Sounds about right
That's pretty insane with .080 on an LS3. Appreciate the info.
I like to crunch numbers for various bore & stroke combinations as well. Way cheaper to build them on paper
I collected oo many spare parts over the years: my old LS1 engine, a LS6 block, a LS2 block & an ERL sleeved 5.3 block etc. It would make my day if that LS6 sonic checked it could go 4 inch.
![Happy](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_stretch.gif)
I like to crunch numbers for various bore & stroke combinations as well. Way cheaper to build them on paper
![Happy](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_stretch.gif)
I think I'd need to check before a 100% been a while since I've looked over
Last edited by Corona; 11-23-2021 at 02:08 AM.
#29
TECH Enthusiast
The following users liked this post:
99 Black Bird T/A (11-23-2021)
#30
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Your right ✅
That worked out very close to the AMC 401's actually specs. A++
I wish all LS blocks could be used to build an AMC style Bore: 4.195 in.Stroke: 3.680 in that would ne a hell of a big bore engine.
Legacy of owning a worthless 77 AMC Hornet as first car. I keep trying to forget AMC.
That worked out very close to the AMC 401's actually specs. A++
I wish all LS blocks could be used to build an AMC style Bore: 4.195 in.Stroke: 3.680 in that would ne a hell of a big bore engine.
Legacy of owning a worthless 77 AMC Hornet as first car. I keep trying to forget AMC.
Last edited by 99 Black Bird T/A; 11-24-2021 at 12:35 AM.
#31
12 Second Club
Thread Starter
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I see plenty of 408s making over 600hp. I'd be happy with the 400 if it was making right at 600 at the crank. I think this is possible.
#34
12 Second Club
Thread Starter
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Well, I can't change my drive train. It's going to rob "x" amount of power from any engine I have. All I can do is maximize the flywheel hp, and hope for the best at the wheel. I'm not really chasing a HP goal anyway. I just like to set reasonable expectations for what it is. In this case, I think 600 fwhp from a 400 cid is reasonable. If I had a "race car", I would do things differently. Since this is a car that I occasionally use to get groceries in, I need to keep it mostly stock looking.
I'm not trying to be the fastest car at the track or on the streets. I know that goal is futile. I just want something that is fun to drive, but still daily drive-able. Besides, anything over 500 Whp is mostly unusable on the streets. Hell, I can barely keep traction on these SA streets as it is.
I'm not trying to be the fastest car at the track or on the streets. I know that goal is futile. I just want something that is fun to drive, but still daily drive-able. Besides, anything over 500 Whp is mostly unusable on the streets. Hell, I can barely keep traction on these SA streets as it is.
![EEK !!](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_eek2.gif)
#35
12 Second Club
Thread Starter
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
No problem.
![Happy](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_stretch.gif)
I have the 4L80 and full accessories, so I was thinking more like 480-500 at the wheel. That would be plenty for me.
![Burnout](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_burnout.gif)
The following users liked this post:
99 Black Bird T/A (11-23-2021)
#36
TECH Enthusiast
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Your right ✅
That worked out very close to the AMC 491's actually specs. A++
I wish all LS blocks could be used to build an AMC style Bore: 4.195 in.Stroke: 3.680 in that would ne a hell of a big bore engine.
Legacy of owning a worthless 77 AMC Hornet as first car. I keep trying to forget AMC.
That worked out very close to the AMC 491's actually specs. A++
I wish all LS blocks could be used to build an AMC style Bore: 4.195 in.Stroke: 3.680 in that would ne a hell of a big bore engine.
Legacy of owning a worthless 77 AMC Hornet as first car. I keep trying to forget AMC.
My first car was a 1969 AMX 390CID 4spd with the rare "Big Bad Blue" color.
In high school (1974) I was hated by the rich kids that owned new Camaros and Corvettes
![Grin](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_grin.gif)
![Another max bore question-ufsgrma.jpg](https://ls1tech.com/forums/attachments/generation-iv-internal-engine/712587d1683230201t-another-max-bore-question-ufsgrma.jpg)
The following users liked this post:
99 Black Bird T/A (11-24-2021)
#37
TECH Senior Member
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I can't remember who did AMC's styling those years, but they sure knocked it out of the park! I even liked the Hornets from then.
#38