Generation IV Internal Engine 2005-2014 LS2 | LS3 | LS7 | L92 | LS9

Another max bore question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-21-2021, 11:40 PM
  #21  
Banned
 
Corona's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2020
Posts: 1,984
Received 680 Likes on 554 Posts
Default

Guys who do crazy stuff like this have a few things in common

Free parts
Don't care cause it's more race driven..Fill the block
Build it as a test to see knowing there maybe another engine needed while some drive for many miles.

I ask what gain will be seen from the stock bore of .060 to .070 to the bore size Wanted at? A example of a 4.0030 bore Vs a 4.080 bore size would net around let's say 10 hp.

.080 + 10hp
.09​​​​0 + 13 to 15hp
.100 +20hp

25 to 50+ fwhp over
.125 to 4.185 bore

Quick trick is Ole math

add a little stroke to Make up any differences 4.080 to 4.125 crank with a .070 bore will make hp. Horsepower = Torque x RPM / 5,252.

a Spare gen4 LQ4 block block that would like sonic testing with a larger CCW 4.125 crank... that's a rubbish idea @ this point. But a good idea using 6.00 rods for a better piston pin. The truth is no matter what sonic testing is needed

Set a realistic goal on hp and rpm band no need to Max out Anything.
Old 11-22-2021, 01:31 AM
  #22  
Banned
 
Corona's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2020
Posts: 1,984
Received 680 Likes on 554 Posts
Default

https://sdparts.com/i-24498593-genui...rankshaft.html

3.860 stroke
6.250 rod
1.050 piston pin height aka* 4.065 to .075 bore pistons for a 4.125 crank


Equals to having a 0 deck height at 9.230


Ask me how do I know this? what I do for fun. The pistons came from me looking over a 4.125 crank using a 4.065 to .075 over bore.



Idk about the K1 4.125 crank for $800 smakers. Lol.

compression would Stay the same @ (11.5 to 13.2) depending on which manufacturer used for pistons for a .060 to .075 bore and 4.125 crank.

JE has a few also Mahle, Carrillo, Weisco, Diamond

Trust me I've spec'ed a 426 to 424 CID sb all using a 4.125 crank looking for the perfect compression for pump gas. Quick build idea bored.

Last edited by Corona; 11-22-2021 at 01:43 AM.
Old 11-22-2021, 05:54 PM
  #23  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
99 Black Bird T/A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 8,591
Received 1,444 Likes on 1,002 Posts

Default

Sounds about right That's pretty insane with .080 on an LS3. Appreciate the info.

I like to crunch numbers for various bore & stroke combinations as well. Way cheaper to build them on paper I collected oo many spare parts over the years: my old LS1 engine, a LS6 block, a LS2 block & an ERL sleeved 5.3 block etc. It would make my day if that LS6 sonic checked it could go 4 inch.

Old 11-22-2021, 07:20 PM
  #24  
"I MAID THEESE"
iTrader: (3)
 
Mavn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Houston
Posts: 2,744
Received 675 Likes on 425 Posts

Default

I want to do a 4.100 x 4.125 ls3 block with a set of ls7 heads. Maybe one day when I'm not broke 🥵
The following 2 users liked this post by Mavn:
99 Black Bird T/A (11-22-2021), LCBE (11-22-2021)
Old 11-22-2021, 08:46 PM
  #25  
12 Second Club
Thread Starter
 
Utinator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 924
Likes: 0
Received 175 Likes on 128 Posts
Default

My dad had a 400 SBC in his Gen-2 Camaro when he was racing dirt tracks. I always thought it would be cool to have one in my Camaro, but I like fuel injection and aluminum blocks too much. lol. I like the idea of having a non-stock LS displacement size with an LS motor. For example, I found ways to make a 392 cid (Hemi), 396 cid (BBC), and even a 302 cid (SBF) with after-market parts. If an LS2 can be bored more than .030" over, then I think a 400 cid (SBC) is possible. Of course, there are more options when you re-sleeve, but these sizes are achievable without re-sleeving.


Ok, here's a serious question for the masses: If you have a V-8 engine with a 4.040" bore, and a 3.9" stroke, what cid would you call it?
Old 11-22-2021, 09:30 PM
  #26  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
99 Black Bird T/A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 8,591
Received 1,444 Likes on 1,002 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Utinator
Ok, here's a serious question for the masses: If you have a V-8 engine with a 4.040" bore, and a 3.9" stroke, what cid would you call it?
Honestly NA, I'd call it a mistake for not using a 4 inch crank

At ~399 cubic inches, I'd call it either 396, 6.6 litre for Pontiac folks or 400
The following users liked this post:
Corona (11-22-2021)
Old 11-22-2021, 09:36 PM
  #27  
Banned
 
Corona's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2020
Posts: 1,984
Received 680 Likes on 554 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mavn
I want to do a 4.100 x 4.125 ls3 block with a set of ls7 heads. Maybe one day when I'm not broke 🥵
don't max out the bore for rebuild or maintenance...
the 15 hp isn't worth it. Put a S/R on your 408 and you could have 8 sec hp. Cam specific. You have more compression than Flyin but 8 cubic inches small = about the same hp Cam specific.
Old 11-22-2021, 11:48 PM
  #28  
Banned
 
Corona's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2020
Posts: 1,984
Received 680 Likes on 554 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 99 Black Bird T/A
Sounds about right That's pretty insane with .080 on an LS3. Appreciate the info.

I like to crunch numbers for various bore & stroke combinations as well. Way cheaper to build them on paper I collected oo many spare parts over the years: my old LS1 engine, a LS6 block, a LS2 block & an ERL sleeved 5.3 block etc. It would make my day if that LS6 sonic checked it could go 4 inch.
won't happen as 5.3 is iron and generally is Thicker and can be bored bigger than the typical Ls6 sleeve.
I think I'd need to check before a 100% been a while since I've looked over

Last edited by Corona; 11-23-2021 at 02:08 AM.
Old 11-23-2021, 12:14 AM
  #29  
TECH Enthusiast
 
RedXray's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 665
Received 380 Likes on 252 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 99 Black Bird T/A
At ~399 cubic inches, I'd call it either 396, 6.6 litre for Pontiac folks or 400
You left out the 401 AMC guys 4.165 bore X 3.860 stroke
The following users liked this post:
99 Black Bird T/A (11-23-2021)
Old 11-23-2021, 07:33 AM
  #30  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
99 Black Bird T/A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 8,591
Received 1,444 Likes on 1,002 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by RedXray
You left out the 401 AMC guys 4.165 bore X 3.860 stroke
Your right ✅

That worked out very close to the AMC 401's actually specs. A++

I wish all LS blocks could be used to build an AMC style Bore: 4.195 in.Stroke: 3.680 in that would ne a hell of a big bore engine.

Legacy of owning a worthless 77 AMC Hornet as first car. I keep trying to forget AMC.

Last edited by 99 Black Bird T/A; 11-24-2021 at 12:35 AM.
Old 11-23-2021, 09:20 AM
  #31  
12 Second Club
Thread Starter
 
Utinator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 924
Likes: 0
Received 175 Likes on 128 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 99 Black Bird T/A
Honestly NA, I'd call it a mistake for not using a 4 inch crank

At ~399 cubic inches, I'd call it either 396, 6.6 litre for Pontiac folks or 400
Yeah, I knew someone would say that. Lol. I know there's no replacement for displacement, but who else has a 400cid LS motor? I would do it just to be different. Yes, it technically calculates to 399.95 cid. I would still call it a 400 though. The 396 would be a 4.020 bore. I wouldn't call the 4.040 bore a 396.

I see plenty of 408s making over 600hp. I'd be happy with the 400 if it was making right at 600 at the crank. I think this is possible.
Old 11-23-2021, 01:15 PM
  #32  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
99 Black Bird T/A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 8,591
Received 1,444 Likes on 1,002 Posts

Default

The 400 making 600hp fly wheel should be do able.. Say ~500 whp to ~535 whp that's pretty sweet in my opinion.

Just teasing with my crank crank comment wink.
Old 11-23-2021, 03:33 PM
  #33  
"I MAID THEESE"
iTrader: (3)
 
Mavn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Houston
Posts: 2,744
Received 675 Likes on 425 Posts

Default

Engine dyno numbers are all that matter now a days anyway 🥴
Old 11-23-2021, 05:52 PM
  #34  
12 Second Club
Thread Starter
 
Utinator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 924
Likes: 0
Received 175 Likes on 128 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mavn
Engine dyno numbers are all that matter now a days anyway 🥴
Well, I can't change my drive train. It's going to rob "x" amount of power from any engine I have. All I can do is maximize the flywheel hp, and hope for the best at the wheel. I'm not really chasing a HP goal anyway. I just like to set reasonable expectations for what it is. In this case, I think 600 fwhp from a 400 cid is reasonable. If I had a "race car", I would do things differently. Since this is a car that I occasionally use to get groceries in, I need to keep it mostly stock looking.

I'm not trying to be the fastest car at the track or on the streets. I know that goal is futile. I just want something that is fun to drive, but still daily drive-able. Besides, anything over 500 Whp is mostly unusable on the streets. Hell, I can barely keep traction on these SA streets as it is.
Old 11-23-2021, 06:01 PM
  #35  
12 Second Club
Thread Starter
 
Utinator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 924
Likes: 0
Received 175 Likes on 128 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 99 Black Bird T/A
The 400 making 600hp fly wheel should be do able.. Say ~500 whp to ~535 whp that's pretty sweet in my opinion.

Just teasing with my crank crank comment wink.

No problem. I understand. The 4" crank is more logical, since it costs the same. I just like the cid options that you get with the 3.9" crank.

I have the 4L80 and full accessories, so I was thinking more like 480-500 at the wheel. That would be plenty for me.
The following users liked this post:
99 Black Bird T/A (11-23-2021)
Old 11-23-2021, 09:16 PM
  #36  
TECH Enthusiast
 
RedXray's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 665
Received 380 Likes on 252 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 99 Black Bird T/A
Your right ✅

That worked out very close to the AMC 491's actually specs. A++

I wish all LS blocks could be used to build an AMC style Bore: 4.195 in.Stroke: 3.680 in that would ne a hell of a big bore engine.

Legacy of owning a worthless 77 AMC Hornet as first car. I keep trying to forget AMC.
Oh man I feel you're pain haha

My first car was a 1969 AMX 390CID 4spd with the rare "Big Bad Blue" color.
In high school (1974) I was hated by the rich kids that owned new Camaros and Corvettes

Another max bore question-ufsgrma.jpg


The following users liked this post:
99 Black Bird T/A (11-24-2021)
Old 11-24-2021, 12:21 AM
  #37  
TECH Senior Member
 
G Atsma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Central Cal.
Posts: 21,136
Received 3,113 Likes on 2,428 Posts
Default

I can't remember who did AMC's styling those years, but they sure knocked it out of the park! I even liked the Hornets from then.
Old 03-13-2024, 08:50 AM
  #38  
TKG
Registered User
 
TKG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2024
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mavn
4.060 on an aluminum ls2 block 4 years ago still running n/a to this day inna trailblazer
Im in the process of rebuilding my 6.0 in my Trailblazer and it needs to go .035 (.040) over. You just gave me hope.
Old 03-13-2024, 09:21 AM
  #39  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (13)
 
LS1Formulation's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Grand Rapids, Michigan
Posts: 2,721
Received 570 Likes on 452 Posts

Default

Sonic test and check for core shift. Not every block will be able to withstand that much of an overbore.



Quick Reply: Another max bore question



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:19 AM.