Generation IV Internal Engine 2005-2014 LS2 | LS3 | LS7 | L92 | LS9

C6Z Solid Roller LS7 Build

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-24-2023, 06:00 PM
  #21  
ModSquad
iTrader: (6)
 
Che70velle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Dawsonville Ga.
Posts: 6,464
Received 3,512 Likes on 2,164 Posts

Default

I mean…ARH throws in an x-pipe with the package. Come on man! Seriously though, the current price-bump is maddening to say the least. There is real power there however, and if you happen to find an “extra” $4k laying around, you won’t regret it.
The following 2 users liked this post by Che70velle:
02EBC5Z06 (08-25-2023), Ryans99ls1 (08-24-2023)
Old 08-24-2023, 06:22 PM
  #22  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (11)
 
Floorman279's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Wilmington, DE
Posts: 3,683
Received 160 Likes on 130 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Ryans99ls1
Never cared about the material really, but no one else making 2in x3.5in headers/xpipe for a c6z that i know of. So yeah, didnt buy them
multiple vendors on here could probable get them closer to 3600......i probably have had mine sitting for id say a year and a half now, maybe a little more....i think i paid 3300.

i get its a ton of money, but for those who dont understand, obviously you are paying for fitment, and i dont know of any other 3.5" x pipe kits out there ......so they really have the market corner......the x looks really friggin nice tho. i have some pics on my phone of me putting items inside the 3.5" collector.....items range from a fire extinguisher to a jar of sauce lol
Old 08-24-2023, 06:23 PM
  #23  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (11)
 
Floorman279's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Wilmington, DE
Posts: 3,683
Received 160 Likes on 130 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Che70velle
I mean…ARH throws in an x-pipe with the package. Come on man! Seriously though, the current price-bump is maddening to say the least. There is real power there however, and if you happen to find an “extra” $4k laying around, you won’t regret it.
a mandrel bend x pipe in 3.5" from an exhaust shop id imagine would range anywhere from 200-400 at least, and the quality of the ARH piece would be tough to beat....

side note for the naysayers about the ARH setup, lets say the ARH 3.5" collector with the x pipe costs $2000 more than "the other guys", i could almost guarantee it on a large bore motor, the ARH would make 15+ more to the wheel above 6000 rpm...not to mention whatever midrange........so $125 per hp is well within range of dollar per hp in this inflated market

Last edited by Floorman279; 08-24-2023 at 06:27 PM. Reason: ........
The following users liked this post:
Che70velle (08-24-2023)
Old 08-24-2023, 07:22 PM
  #24  
TECH Fanatic
 
jayyyw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 1,320
Received 800 Likes on 402 Posts
Default

I think i paid $3200 last year around May for my "race" headers from ARH. They fit perfect on the brodix heads I was running. Did not rub anywhere. I did have to modify the x pipe for my CID heads this time around.
The following users liked this post:
Ryans99ls1 (08-24-2023)
Old 08-24-2023, 08:33 PM
  #25  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (16)
 
Ryans99ls1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: OH & MI
Posts: 1,509
Received 120 Likes on 59 Posts

Default

ARH quality and fitment is unmatched, no doubt about that.

But you guys have sufficiently got my brain going, i have a few ideas i need to price out now.
Old 08-24-2023, 09:35 PM
  #26  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (11)
 
Floorman279's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Wilmington, DE
Posts: 3,683
Received 160 Likes on 130 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Ryans99ls1
ARH quality and fitment is unmatched, no doubt about that.

But you guys have sufficiently got my brain going, i have a few ideas i need to price out now.
im certainly on board with you waiting if necessary.....a used set of headers are pretty easy to find, and the arh can be thrown on later. i more or less was just adding my thoughts for those thinking they may be inflated in their value. highly doubt they would discontinue them, but it would suck if for some reason they stop making them when you are ready to buy then need to pay the markup for NOS ones.
Old 08-25-2023, 02:38 PM
  #27  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (16)
 
Ryans99ls1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: OH & MI
Posts: 1,509
Received 120 Likes on 59 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Floorman279
im certainly on board with you waiting if necessary.....a used set of headers are pretty easy to find, and the arh can be thrown on later. i more or less was just adding my thoughts for those thinking they may be inflated in their value. highly doubt they would discontinue them, but it would suck if for some reason they stop making them when you are ready to buy then need to pay the markup for NOS ones.
I've been on the hunt for a used 2in x 3.5in setup for a couple years now.. unicorns!
Old 08-25-2023, 04:43 PM
  #28  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (11)
 
Floorman279's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Wilmington, DE
Posts: 3,683
Received 160 Likes on 130 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Ryans99ls1
I've been on the hunt for a used 2in x 3.5in setup for a couple years now.. unicorns!
i meant if you needed to just find any used header for now to slap on for the time being
Old 08-26-2023, 07:26 PM
  #29  
Teching In
 
LCBE's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 33
Received 13 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

What program are you using for the power simulation?

I will be following the build.
Old 10-06-2023, 08:27 AM
  #30  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (16)
 
Ryans99ls1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: OH & MI
Posts: 1,509
Received 120 Likes on 59 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by LCBE
What program are you using for the power simulation?

I will be following the build.
Not sure what he was using, but he was feeding me the data from his program and then i did my thing

And for the others, i will be modifying the 2in headers i have. I got in touch with a good fab guy who is going to increase the 3in collector to 3.5 and then make me a vbanded 3.5in xpipe. I should be able to sell the 3in x to someone who has a catted setup and wants an off road version. Whole ordeal should end up costing less than half of what it cost to buy new, i can accept that. Thanks for making me spend more money ya'll, much appreciated.

Heads are still being worked. MSD is about 80% done, trinity in a similar state. Iffy on whether or not they'll make it back in time to assemble this year. AMT diff and motor mounts going in this weekend and that's about it.
The following users liked this post:
02EBC5Z06 (10-06-2023)
Old 10-06-2023, 11:27 AM
  #31  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (16)
 
Ryans99ls1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: OH & MI
Posts: 1,509
Received 120 Likes on 59 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Che70velle
It sounds like you’ve spent some time on the matter. In the 90’s, when NASCAR threw restrictor plates at us engine guys, we all of a sudden were very intake limited also. Airflow was lopped off drastically and we had to figure out how to get more air in the engine with what we had. While I can’t speak on this too much, I’ll say that you’ll have to think outside the box to get the most out of ANY intake manifold that has a front mounted TB…(restrictor plate). Just because the intake gives up at 6500k rpm, doesn’t mean you can’t make power above that…it just gets harder to find it. Now if your simply going to the track a few times a year, just to have fun and goof off, then your going to be happy with this. But if your class racing, or you simply want to go faster, your gonna have to look around at other areas of the camshaft, not just valve events. Lift is your friend (torque) and will improve everything almost everywhere. You have the valvetrain parts to go bigger. A lot of guys won’t throw more lift at a port that starts giving up flow at a certain lift…research Flow Dwell Time, and you’ll see why opening the valve higher helps a port that’s stalling out at a certain flow number. More time spent by the valve at or above that threshold will pay dividends…which is where duration (to a certain extent) can help you, even though the valve events look “perfect” on paper. Going to a 2” step header to a 2 1/8” and a 3.5” collector with a 3.5” exhaust will help you also, particularly with the LS7 port and chamber design. Off topic here, but GM’s latest nascar R07 engine has an intake port that mirrors the LS7…yes the LS7 is that good.
FWIW, I love what your doing here. It’s great to see another fresh build here on Tech.
I also played with the wallace racing Mach Index Calculator recently and it kind of connected the dots on why the setup isn't responding to more duration at the fixed valve lift. The setup chokes between 7250-7500 rpm. With the current valve size, piston, stroke, i need a minimum valve lift of 0.750 to free it up all the way to 8000rpm. All that the larger cams are doing is killing the bottom end while getting choked up top where they are trying to do their thing. The MSD intake is actually even more impressive considering how well it does to about 7000rpm, wish the out of the box build quality was there too though! (I HATE the MSD but i can't ignore how well it performs..)

Walkers build at 0.800 lift makes complete sense, and his numbers show why. Pretty cool stuff.
The following 3 users liked this post by Ryans99ls1:
02EBC5Z06 (10-06-2023), Che70velle (10-08-2023), jayyyw (10-06-2023)
Old 10-06-2023, 04:24 PM
  #32  
TECH Enthusiast
 
Bob570's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Michigan
Posts: 530
Received 221 Likes on 166 Posts
Default

Wow I'm not sure how I missed this. This is going to be an awesome build. I'm very curious to see how it does with the SR MSD since that's the route I'll be going in the future. I drive my car a lot (about 6000 miles per Michigan summer) so I don't think I would want a cam quite that size, but it's always nice to get more data.
Old 10-09-2023, 08:55 AM
  #33  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (16)
 
Ryans99ls1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: OH & MI
Posts: 1,509
Received 120 Likes on 59 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Bob570
Wow I'm not sure how I missed this. This is going to be an awesome build. I'm very curious to see how it does with the SR MSD since that's the route I'll be going in the future. I drive my car a lot (about 6000 miles per Michigan summer) so I don't think I would want a cam quite that size, but it's always nice to get more data.
Thank you, hoping so!

If i didn't get the rockers and lifters for so cheap, I definitely wouldn't have gone done the solid roller path on this setup. It became even more true once BTR released their V2 stage 3 and 4 LS7 cams. My spec isn't significantly different enough from their stage 4 V2, so i don't expect it to make some huge difference in power (maybe 15-20hp max?). For almost everyone with a standard factory ported/milled LS7 head and stock rockers, those two new specs, along with the RPM B3 or Brenton's Excalibur cam, will satisfy nearly everyone and make fantastic power. They maxed out the valve lift on all of those, and going to roller rockers only opens things up to about 0.700lift on the oem head. Now if you have an aftermarket head, that changes things. But on the factory castings with a factory style manifold, those 4 cams just about cover it all when you have a good port and some compression to work with.
Old 10-09-2023, 12:00 PM
  #34  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
 
spanks13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,255
Received 481 Likes on 311 Posts

Default

Why is .700 lift the maximum on a stock LS7 head?
Old 10-09-2023, 12:28 PM
  #35  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (11)
 
Floorman279's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Wilmington, DE
Posts: 3,683
Received 160 Likes on 130 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by spanks13
Why is .700 lift the maximum on a stock LS7 head?
I believe spring pocket material is pretty thin on a stock casting ls7 as well as not really recommended to go above .660 ish lift without a true shaft mount rocker. You could buy shaft mount ready br7 heads for only a few hundred more than the cost to port a stock head, then machine that stock head for the shift mounts. So if you were considering a shift mount, you should just start looking for an aftermarket head
Old 10-09-2023, 12:54 PM
  #36  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (16)
 
Ryans99ls1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: OH & MI
Posts: 1,509
Received 120 Likes on 59 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by spanks13
Why is .700 lift the maximum on a stock LS7 head?

The stock rocker wipe pattern goes to **** above .660 lift. So then you need a roller rocker to enable more lift, and when you introduce a roller rocker, you need more spring pressure to handle the increased mass over the nose. The springs options for the factory sized spring pocket that can handle the lift and the increase tip weight are limited and pretty expensive. Plus, it requires spring pressures that will absolutely cause deflection in the factory pedestal. It's just not a good situation to be in long term. Although some have absolutely done it and made killer power. It's a very high maintenance item at that point and i would say most dont want to be doing springs all the time, i know i don't. The PAC1209x's are nice and stable right around 0.700 lift with the added mass. But i should add that I am speaking pretty generally here..0.700 isnt some firm stopping point, i am just saying you aren't going to get too far above it without spending a pretty penny.

If you are going to spend the money on an adjustable rocker setup, do it on an aftermarket head that opens up the spring options to control it all and do it on a shaft mount setup.
The following 3 users liked this post by Ryans99ls1:
Bob570 (10-09-2023), C5_Pete (10-10-2023), Double06 (10-10-2023)
Old 10-09-2023, 04:13 PM
  #37  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
 
spanks13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,255
Received 481 Likes on 311 Posts

Default

Someday we might see how it works on my engine if it ever gets assembled lol. I am putting 1237x springs on stock BES 285cc ported LS7 heads with adjustable T&D steel roller rockers (not shaft rockers, stock pedestal mount), and ground a 258/272 .775/.751 lift cam from comp with their lock shock solid lobes.
Old 10-09-2023, 04:26 PM
  #38  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (1)
 
grinder11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Michigan & Florida
Posts: 2,065
Received 1,005 Likes on 715 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by spanks13
Someday we might see how it works on my engine if it ever gets assembled lol. I am putting 1237x springs on stock BES 285cc ported LS7 heads with adjustable T&D steel roller rockers (not shaft rockers, stock pedestal mount), and ground a 258/272 .775/.751 lift cam from comp with their lock shock solid lobes.
Keep in mind that the shaft mount rockers kinda/sorta tie the pedestals together, again kinda/sorta like the old SBC stud girdles did to reduce stud mount rocker studs from flexing so much. Shaft mount rockers help increase the pedestals rigidity to some extent. I haven't researched the 1237x spring specs, but cant help thinking they're pretty stiff, and if that's the case, anything you can do to reduce the pedestals dancing around up there would be very beneficial. My opinion, and I wish you best of luck......
The following users liked this post:
Double06 (10-10-2023)
Old 10-09-2023, 04:44 PM
  #39  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
 
spanks13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,255
Received 481 Likes on 311 Posts

Default

Oh yea, a shaft rocker on aftermarket castings is 100% the way to go.

The parts mocked up well even at >.750" lift so I was just curious the reasoning to say you can't take stock castings above .700".

The guys I bought the heads from had a very similar setup with the same rockers and made over 800hp and ran it to 7800+.
Old 10-09-2023, 07:26 PM
  #40  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (16)
 
Ryans99ls1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: OH & MI
Posts: 1,509
Received 120 Likes on 59 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by spanks13
Someday we might see how it works on my engine if it ever gets assembled lol. I am putting 1237x springs on stock BES 285cc ported LS7 heads with adjustable T&D steel roller rockers (not shaft rockers, stock pedestal mount), and ground a 258/272 .775/.751 lift cam from comp with their lock shock solid lobes.
If it mocked up well, so be it. But that spring has a .700 recommended lift, 1.8 install height and 1.045 coil bind, seems a bit tight!

Either way, the low shock lobes are great and you'll make great power if everything stays in control. The stock hardware and pedestals will be working hard, thats for sure.


Quick Reply: C6Z Solid Roller LS7 Build



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:42 AM.