What should we call a LS1 with Ls2 parts?
08-13-2004, 12:41 AM
#1
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
What should we call a LS1 with Ls2 parts? 
Ive been thinking most people will be swapping parts from the ls2 to the ls1 Ex.Intakes,TB's,and maybe the trannys etc.Here's my question what will be the know new Engine Terminology to say?It used to be just Ls1 know theres a Ls2.So what would you describe your motor now as?A ls1 with ls2 parts.How diffrent will a ls1 with a ls2 intake look as opposed a ls2 Gen4 stock. 
08-13-2004, 02:39 AM
#6
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
Could this be the first time we use a Generation like the GM Gen IV (LS2) parts on a previous Gen III (LS1).Or am I wrong?Has there been any other previous Gen power plant that has been compatible with a newer production power plant?
Last edited by RobZ; 08-13-2004 at 03:30 AM.
Trending Topics
08-13-2004, 02:53 PM
#13
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Jersey
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by RobZ
Could this be the first time we use a Generation like the GM Gen IV (LS2) parts on a previous Gen III (LS1).Or am I wrong?Has there been any other previous Gen power plant that has been compatible with a newer production power plant?
No this is not the first time.You can swap parts from the Gen 1 to Gen 2 small blocks.Things like external parts,intakes,heads,rotating assemblies(less crank) and many more littler pieces.Only real difference was the one piece rear seal,reverse flow cooling and roller lifters.Oh,and of course the lovely Opti-spark.
Makes sense...
08-14-2004, 12:35 PM
#17
Staging Lane
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Hobbs, NM
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I like ls-s
or lss
Ive been thinking most people will be swapping parts from the ls2 to the ls1 Ex.Intakes,TB's,and maybe the trannys etc.Here's my question what will be the know new Engine Terminology to say?It used to be just Ls1 know theres a Ls2.So what would you describe your motor now as?A ls1 with ls2 parts.How diffrent will a ls1 with a ls2 intake look as opposed a ls2 Gen4 stock.
or lss
Originally Posted by RobZ
Ive been thinking most people will be swapping parts from the ls2 to the ls1 Ex.Intakes,TB's,and maybe the trannys etc.Here's my question what will be the know new Engine Terminology to say?It used to be just Ls1 know theres a Ls2.So what would you describe your motor now as?A ls1 with ls2 parts.How diffrent will a ls1 with a ls2 intake look as opposed a ls2 Gen4 stock.
08-17-2004, 08:16 PM
#19
TECH Enthusiast
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Native Texan
Posts: 540
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think they should be called BOB. BOB is easy to remember and BOB is the same backwards as it is forwards.
Also as far as math goes: I never did agree with the teaching that two negatives mulitiplies equalled a positive. It simply does not work and there are no examples to prove it. I even had a teacher try and prove it to me by saying if you had seven people that leach lost seven dollars gambling it would be -49, but the problem lies in the fact that you are mulitpling a positvie number of people by a negative amount of money lost, so this rule would not apply. Alot of the BS we were "taught" was just that B.S.! ........Sorry the math comments just brought back old memories.
Also as far as math goes: I never did agree with the teaching that two negatives mulitiplies equalled a positive. It simply does not work and there are no examples to prove it. I even had a teacher try and prove it to me by saying if you had seven people that leach lost seven dollars gambling it would be -49, but the problem lies in the fact that you are mulitpling a positvie number of people by a negative amount of money lost, so this rule would not apply. Alot of the BS we were "taught" was just that B.S.! ........Sorry the math comments just brought back old memories.
Last edited by Speedfreaks101; 08-17-2004 at 08:17 PM. Reason: grammer mistake
08-17-2004, 08:31 PM
#20
Originally Posted by Speedfreaks101
I even had a teacher try and prove it to me by saying if you had seven people that leach lost seven dollars gambling it would be -49, but the problem lies in the fact that you are mulitpling a positvie number of people by a negative amount of money lost, so this rule would not apply.
what was the confusion? a positive amount of money = 7 dollars, and 7 people lose it. someone is 49 dollars richer but the group is now under 49 from when they started. i think you need to hit the calculus books again.
oh and back on topic...LS1.5