Generation IV Internal Engine 2005-2014 LS2 | LS3 | LS7 | L92 | LS9

Dyno'd my stock LS2 today.. woot!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-04-2006, 10:09 PM
  #1  
TECH Veteran
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Steve1969LS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Anaheim Hills, CA
Posts: 4,274
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default Dyno'd my stock LS2 today.. woot!

The STOCK LS2 with the stock heads, intake, cam and all that was hooked up to the engine dyno today.

Only "upgrades" were some Hooker 1 3/4" long tube headers since we had no way to hook up the stock exhaust manifolds.

After some tuning we made 462HP .. this on a motor that's rated at 400hp..

Then we took off the Hooker headers and bolted on the 1 7/8 stepped race headers from 21st Century Street Machines I have ..

472hp! :wow:

Picking up 10hp from a header swap is great.. and we lost nothing on the top end. the 21st Cen headers gained from about mid pull all the way to the top..

Then we bolted on some AFR 205 heads and will make that pull in the AM. After that the cam then the FAST intake..

Anyone wanna guess the final number?
Old 05-04-2006, 10:14 PM
  #2  
Restricted User
iTrader: (1)
 
fenix99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 530
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

holy %$# lol...472 at the wheels or crank??? it seems to me that this is at the crank so imma guess at least 565 @ the crank with the cam/heads/and manifold, if not more... bwahaaha, very nice #'s btw
Old 05-04-2006, 10:32 PM
  #3  
On The Tree
 
knowitman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 135
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

They are nice numbers no matter if they are at the crank or wheels. Would be nicer if at the wheels though.

I'm betting that you will easily hit the 500 mark and then some with the heads.
Old 05-04-2006, 10:39 PM
  #4  
TECH Veteran
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Steve1969LS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Anaheim Hills, CA
Posts: 4,274
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by fenix99
holy %$# lol...472 at the wheels or crank??? it seems to me that this is at the crank so imma guess at least 565 @ the crank with the cam/heads/and manifold, if not more... bwahaaha, very nice #'s btw
Engine dyno.. not a chassis dyno.. that is how much the engine makes at the crank..

Still.. the motor is rated at 400hp at the crank so I am a happy camper so far..

More parts to bolt on and test tomorrow...
Old 05-04-2006, 10:46 PM
  #5  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
bmfcamaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,143
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

who needs sleep. keep it going
Old 05-05-2006, 01:33 AM
  #6  
TECH Addict
 
chuntington101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,866
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

WOW thats ace! was that using the stock ECU or a standalone setup???

thanks Chris.

PS. id go for about 550bhp!
Old 05-05-2006, 01:58 AM
  #7  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (25)
 
LS1Aggie09's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Katy & College Station, TX
Posts: 1,271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

mother of god....
Old 05-05-2006, 05:12 AM
  #8  
Teching In
 
Odaxium's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

yeah what's with the sleep business? chop chop!

lol, nice numbers
Old 05-05-2006, 05:32 AM
  #9  
TECH Addict
 
300bhp/ton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: England
Posts: 2,650
Received 13 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

Nice numbers

Are they corrected to SAE Net?? And what sort of engine dyno are you using?
Old 05-05-2006, 05:46 AM
  #10  
10 Second Club
 
WS6 #3392's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Tn
Posts: 932
Received 138 Likes on 91 Posts

Default

Nice numbers.
Old 05-05-2006, 09:09 AM
  #11  
TECH Veteran
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Steve1969LS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Anaheim Hills, CA
Posts: 4,274
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by chuntington101
WOW thats ace! was that using the stock ECU or a standalone setup???

thanks Chris.

PS. id go for about 550bhp!
The Superflow engine dyno uses a FAST ECU.. I will be running a GM LS2 ECU in my car though.
Old 05-05-2006, 09:10 AM
  #12  
TECH Veteran
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Steve1969LS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Anaheim Hills, CA
Posts: 4,274
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 300bhp/ton
Nice numbers

Are they corrected to SAE Net?? And what sort of engine dyno are you using?
Corrected.. it's a Superflow.. I will get the exact model today. It's a pretty impressive set-up at Westech..
Old 05-05-2006, 09:27 AM
  #13  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (9)
 
Fulton 1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: WA
Posts: 3,326
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Wow, very nice. These "low-tech" LS engines never cease to amaze me...
Old 05-05-2006, 08:02 PM
  #14  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (16)
 
frcefed98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 6,907
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Nice #'s, isn't it nicer to post these things here on 'tech than LS2...jeezus those guys crack me up over there
Old 05-05-2006, 08:30 PM
  #15  
TECH Veteran
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Steve1969LS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Anaheim Hills, CA
Posts: 4,274
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

And the survey says:

573 horsepower

505 ft. lbs. torque

WOOT!

<-- Happy
Attached Thumbnails Dyno'd my stock LS2 today.. woot!-dyno1.jpg   Dyno'd my stock LS2 today.. woot!-dyno2.jpg  
Old 05-05-2006, 08:46 PM
  #16  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (9)
 
Fulton 1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: WA
Posts: 3,326
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Steve1969LS1
<-- Happy
ya sure...?
Old 05-05-2006, 08:49 PM
  #17  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (15)
 
DrkPhx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: St. Michael, MN.
Posts: 4,519
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Wow, that's crazy. Good numbers. Any reason you didn't go with the 225's?
Old 05-05-2006, 08:59 PM
  #18  
TECH Veteran
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Steve1969LS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Anaheim Hills, CA
Posts: 4,274
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by DrkPhx
Wow, that's crazy. Good numbers. Any reason you didn't go with the 225's?
AFR said these are better street heads.. engine idles nice and should be easy to live with.. I also have stock compression..

Oh, and we ran this test on crappy 91 octane ARCO gas
Old 05-06-2006, 09:36 AM
  #19  
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
gogogadget's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

So just to be clear, the 573 number was with a stock LS2, headers, and AFR 205 heads & FAST intake? I couldn't tell if that was with the cam or not.
Old 05-06-2006, 10:24 AM
  #20  
Moderator
iTrader: (10)
 
John B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 3,254
Received 15 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

Very impressive Steve! Now it's time a nice lumpy cam before you pull it off of the dyno!


Quick Reply: Dyno'd my stock LS2 today.. woot!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:17 PM.