Generation IV Internal Engine 2005-2014 LS2 | LS3 | LS7 | L92 | LS9

Making a LS7 head rev?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-06-2006 | 11:42 AM
  #21  
ram09's Avatar
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
From: Giddings, TX
Default

Originally Posted by RyneZ06
how crack have you smoked today???? this isnt F1 racing
SO!!! If I ever build a 68 or 69 Z28 Camaro this would be the motor I put in. It would sound like a small block with to much caffeine.
Old 07-06-2006 | 12:03 PM
  #22  
Katech_Jason's Avatar
LS1TECH Sponsor

iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,939
Likes: 4
Default

Originally Posted by gun5l1ng3r
What does that thing sounds like @ 8400 RPM?
Videos!

Get me a customer and I'll get you a video.
Old 07-07-2006 | 10:16 AM
  #23  
MrDude_1's Avatar
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 3,366
Likes: 2
From: Charleston, SC
Default

Originally Posted by ram09
Why not build a 4.125 inch bore/ 3.00 inch stroke motor? That would make a 321 inch motor. At that bore to stroke ratio 8k rpm shouldnt be a problem at all. Hell 8k+ shouldnt be a problem. .............This setup will spin up faster and on the street get better mileage.
Why not build a 4.125 inch bore/ 4.125 inch stroke motor? That would make a huge inch motor. At that 8k rpm shouldnt be a problem at all. .............This setup will make a hell of alot more power.
Old 07-07-2006 | 11:10 AM
  #24  
ram09's Avatar
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
From: Giddings, TX
Default

Originally Posted by MrDude_1
Why not build a 4.125 inch bore/ 4.125 inch stroke motor? That would make a huge inch motor. At that 8k rpm shouldnt be a problem at all. .............This setup will make a hell of alot more power.
your right it would be bigger 441 inch and will make more power but it wont spin up as fast. You would also have to worry more about piston "rock", at least that is what I have been told. Besides some people (like my self) like little motors! I love the thought of beating a guy with a big inch motor, when all I have is a little 327 or 283.
Old 07-07-2006 | 11:24 AM
  #25  
Louis's Avatar
FormerVendor
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 4,168
Likes: 2
From: Frisco/Wylie
Default

Originally Posted by Katech
We have spun to 8400rpm with our "Sneak Attack" LS7 destroked 5.7L
You mean the CTS-VR back in 04?
Old 07-07-2006 | 12:21 PM
  #26  
MrDude_1's Avatar
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 3,366
Likes: 2
From: Charleston, SC
Default

Originally Posted by ram09
your right it would be bigger 441 inch and will make more power but it wont spin up as fast. You would also have to worry more about piston "rock", at least that is what I have been told. Besides some people (like my self) like little motors! I love the thought of beating a guy with a big inch motor, when all I have is a little 327 or 283.
lol, you only have to worry about spinning it up, if you slow it down first.. im a drag race guy, so no worries about spinning it up... she'd be near redline when the race starts. lol.

you would have to worry about the piston "rocking" since it would have a very short skirt (in this case, thats a bad thing) to clear the crank... however, if its built right, that doesnt really matter, the extra cubes far offsets the downsides for the app im envisioning.
Old 07-07-2006 | 12:56 PM
  #27  
Katech_Jason's Avatar
LS1TECH Sponsor

iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,939
Likes: 4
Default

Originally Posted by Louis
You mean the CTS-VR back in 04?
\

Same concept.



Quick Reply: Making a LS7 head rev?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:27 PM.