Lingenfelter GT-11 cam and CNC'd heads for CTS-V?
#1
On The Tree
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Arlington, Tx
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Does anyone have feedback on this cam for a 2006 CTS-V?
Cam info...
I am also looking at their CNC'd LS2 heads with their dual valve springs. Which intake valve diameter would be best with stock cubes and this setup?
I would like to get a good increase in power without having to add headers and retaining the quiet cadillac purr instead of a lope.
Thanks
Cam info...
Lingenfelter GT11 camshaft will produce excellent power and still have a streetable idle for automatic or six speed manual transmission equipped vehicles. Tests have shown 500 HP in the new LS2 6.0L engine with stock manifolds and catalysts.
Suggested in 350-427 CID applications
Camshaft specifications: 215/231 duration @ .050 .631/.644 with 1.7 ratio rocker arms 118.0 CL. This camshaft will require dual valve spring kit 26921-KIT. Camshafts ground by Competition Cams for Lingenfelter.
Suggested in 350-427 CID applications
Camshaft specifications: 215/231 duration @ .050 .631/.644 with 1.7 ratio rocker arms 118.0 CL. This camshaft will require dual valve spring kit 26921-KIT. Camshafts ground by Competition Cams for Lingenfelter.
Stainless steel one piece 2.02” diameter intake valves, 1.57” stainless steel exhaust valves – per pair $170.00
or
Stainless steel one piece 2.055” diameter intake valves, 1.57” stainless steel exhaust valves – per pair $440.00
or
Stainless steel one piece 2.055” diameter intake valves, 1.57” stainless steel exhaust valves – per pair $440.00
Thanks
#3
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I am building a 402 stroker, 4.00 stroke, 6.125 rods and I am wondering if that GT11 camshaft has to much lift for what I am running for my concern of valves hitting the pistons. Thank You Johnny
#5
On The Tree
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Odessa, TX
Posts: 178
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I used this cam in a 402 it made 500 flywheel horsepower and 515 ft lbs. I had 5.3 ET performance heads, fast 90 intake. Changed to 238/240 cam made 555 flywheel and 530 ft lbs. The GT 11 was very stealth sounding good cam. That cam has the same piston to valve clearance as any other 215/230 cam would. The question I always had was it big or small? I have a 215/ 230 cam "Damn that small", but it is .630/.644 "Damn that is a big cam" but you said it was small. I wish I would have stuck with the GT11 I think it would have been more street friendly.