Warhawk LS7X 12deg.
#48
TECH Addict
iTrader: (22)
Originally Posted by ScottyRocket
Please tell me these are going to flow over 370 cfm out of the box......fingers crossed!
#53
Collections Removal
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 263
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Stang,
A very fair question and here's where we are now.
The head you see at the top of this thread has been tested as follows:
350/250 @ .700. The head was assembled and tested as it came in the door, as-cast, no bowl blend, porting or back-cut valves- basically nail heads. The numbers were still climbing at .900. This head will want big cams.The results directed that we relocate the valve job slightly-which is happening now. We should have a new test sample head next week with the adjustments, then we'll test again. I'll post if it happens or not to keep you up.
Almost forgot-I'm told we'll most likely change spec from 2.20 x 1.625 to EITHER of 2.275 OR 1.650. We'll test to confirm.
Thanks for asking.
A very fair question and here's where we are now.
The head you see at the top of this thread has been tested as follows:
350/250 @ .700. The head was assembled and tested as it came in the door, as-cast, no bowl blend, porting or back-cut valves- basically nail heads. The numbers were still climbing at .900. This head will want big cams.The results directed that we relocate the valve job slightly-which is happening now. We should have a new test sample head next week with the adjustments, then we'll test again. I'll post if it happens or not to keep you up.
Almost forgot-I'm told we'll most likely change spec from 2.20 x 1.625 to EITHER of 2.275 OR 1.650. We'll test to confirm.
Thanks for asking.
Last edited by MerlinPro; 11-17-2006 at 01:15 PM.
#55
10 Second Club
iTrader: (14)
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Kansas City, KS
Posts: 2,893
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by MerlinPro
Stang,
A very fair question and here's where we are now.
The head you see at the top of this thread has been tested as follows:
350/250 @ .700. The head was assembled and tested as it came in the door, as-cast, no bowl blend, porting or back-cut valves- basically nail heads. The numbers were still climbing at .900. This head will want big cams.The results directed that we relocate the valve job slightly-which is happening now. We should have a new test sample head next week with the adjustments, then we'll test again. I'll post if it happens or not to keep you up.
Almost forgot-I'm told we'll most likely change spec from 2.20 x 1.625 to EITHER of 2.275 OR 1.650. We'll test to confirm.
Thanks for asking.
A very fair question and here's where we are now.
The head you see at the top of this thread has been tested as follows:
350/250 @ .700. The head was assembled and tested as it came in the door, as-cast, no bowl blend, porting or back-cut valves- basically nail heads. The numbers were still climbing at .900. This head will want big cams.The results directed that we relocate the valve job slightly-which is happening now. We should have a new test sample head next week with the adjustments, then we'll test again. I'll post if it happens or not to keep you up.
Almost forgot-I'm told we'll most likely change spec from 2.20 x 1.625 to EITHER of 2.275 OR 1.650. We'll test to confirm.
Thanks for asking.
#56
TECH Addict
iTrader: (22)
Merlin, thanks for the results. If you go to the bigger valves will the minimum bore size still be the same? The reason I am asking is that I am limited to a 4.11 bore and I really want to use these heads. I feel at this point my greatest bang for the buck will be with these versus GM ls7's and the ET LS7's. I am especially encouraged by the exhaust flow. Won't need as big of a split on my cam.
#58
with porting should be in the 400-406 range at .700 lift I assume, like LS7 heads? Full race stuff obviously...street oriented, maybe 370-385 intake and hopefully 250 exhaust with no pipe?
SDB
SDB