L92 flow results with manifold.
11-04-2006, 05:01 PM
#22
Originally Posted by 2c5s
Marginal......... looks like the intake flow numbers equal cathedral port numbers with no intake. My L92 and L76 are ordered.
I think there's going to be a bunch cathedral port door stops laying around in the near future.
I think there's going to be a bunch cathedral port door stops laying around in the near future.
11-04-2006, 07:21 PM
#23
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Rockville, MD
Posts: 4,354
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Richard@WCCH
They look like a one piece intake. I don't see how or where you could separate these manifolds.
Richard
Richard
11-04-2006, 10:06 PM
#24
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (22)
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: 18013
Posts: 713
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
this just made my decision of choosing between an L76 manifold or an L92 carb style manifold even more difficult.
323 cfm through a manifold
do you know how much did the 4.1" bore help over a 4" bore?
323 cfm through a manifold
do you know how much did the 4.1" bore help over a 4" bore?
11-04-2006, 10:49 PM
#26
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Rockville, MD
Posts: 4,354
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Richard@WCCH
I don't see a separable seam around the manifold like the LS7s. Where is the intake supposed to split?
Richard
Richard
Edit: well thats weird as hell. theres 2 posts in the intake that make it look lik a 2 piece. it doesnt seem like the intake needs them for rigidity
but yea there is no seem Last edited by Wnts2Go10O; 11-04-2006 at 10:59 PM.
11-04-2006, 11:31 PM
#28
Originally Posted by Wnts2Go10O
well lemme go look at it more closely.
Edit: well thats weird as hell. theres 2 posts in the intake that make it look lik a 2 piece. it doesnt seem like the intake needs them for rigidity but yea there is no seem
Edit: well thats weird as hell. theres 2 posts in the intake that make it look lik a 2 piece. it doesnt seem like the intake needs them for rigidity
but yea there is no seem Richard
11-07-2006, 05:13 PM
#31
11 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: berkeley ca
Posts: 732
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by zigroid
do you know how much did the 4.1" bore help over a 4" bore?
11-09-2006, 10:19 AM
#33
Originally Posted by Wnts2Go10O
well lemme go look at it more closely.
Edit: well thats weird as hell. theres 2 posts in the intake that make it look lik a 2 piece. it doesnt seem like the intake needs them for rigidity but yea there is no seem
Edit: well thats weird as hell. theres 2 posts in the intake that make it look lik a 2 piece. it doesnt seem like the intake needs them for rigidity
but yea there is no seemthe floor of the intake vibrates without it, and it can make the intake fail.
i believe i read that in Will Handzel's book "How to Build High-Performance Chevy Ls1/Ls6 Engines"... but it could have been another book.. i forget...
11-09-2006, 10:45 AM
#34
Originally Posted by MrDude_1
the floor of the intake vibrates without it, and it can make the intake fail.
i believe i read that in Will Handzel's book "How to Build High-Performance Chevy Ls1/Ls6 Engines"... but it could have been another book.. i forget...
i believe i read that in Will Handzel's book "How to Build High-Performance Chevy Ls1/Ls6 Engines"... but it could have been another book.. i forget...
we got ourselves a booknerd.
11-09-2006, 01:12 PM
#35
Originally Posted by MrDude_1
the floor of the intake vibrates without it, and it can make the intake fail.
i believe i read that in Will Handzel's book "How to Build High-Performance Chevy Ls1/Ls6 Engines"... but it could have been another book.. i forget...
i believe i read that in Will Handzel's book "How to Build High-Performance Chevy Ls1/Ls6 Engines"... but it could have been another book.. i forget...
so i dont think it will affect it to much if they removed, but then again
