Precision Race Components Ported 6.2L Cylinder Heads Almost Ready!
#50
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Jason 98 TA, if got a question bro. Do you have the a set up for me. I'm running an Ls2, 6sp, with long tubes high flow cats. I want compression at 11-1 or 11.5-1 will I need different pistons how much will you mill and do you have the appropriate gaskets for this project. Oya, will the exhaust be ported on L92's. I'm excited!!!!!!!!!!!!
#51
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by SStrokerAce
LS1/LS6= 3.900" bore CAN'T USE L92 HEADS
LS2 = 4.00" bore CAN USE L92 HEADS
It sure looks purdy, and that's what sells.
I'd love to say more in this thread but it gets edited
Bret
LS2 = 4.00" bore CAN USE L92 HEADS
It sure looks purdy, and that's what sells.
I'd love to say more in this thread but it gets edited
![Icon Rolleyes](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies2/icon_rolleyes.gif)
Bret
I don't know what your problem is, but you bad mouthed the heads in my original post until I deleted the post & reposted it. Now your making hints about the cylinder heads & even calling them "cheap" in another thread.
Lets give it a rest unless you have something positive to say. I don't know what your problem is, but these heads are flowing very well compared to not only stock heads, but also other porters heads.
It's irritating when someone who knows nothing about our product goes out of their way to discredit it. I applogize to everyone having to read Bret's uninformed posts... The typical LS1tech people know I spend a lot of timing making sure we produce great products. The 6.2l head will be no exception!
__________________
Jason
Co-Owner, Texas Speed & Performance, Ltd.
2005 Twin Turbo C6
404cid Stroker, 67mm Twins
994rwhp/902lb ft @ 22 psi (mustang dyno) www.Texas-Speed.com
Jason
Co-Owner, Texas Speed & Performance, Ltd.
2005 Twin Turbo C6
404cid Stroker, 67mm Twins
994rwhp/902lb ft @ 22 psi (mustang dyno) www.Texas-Speed.com
#52
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Big Terrible Texas
Posts: 395
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Brett I have to agree with Jason!! I've read your other posts & they seem pretty low. How about you give the heads time & let some testing get done!
Bret why are you trying to discredit a sponsors product that you've never seen?
Bret why are you trying to discredit a sponsors product that you've never seen?
#53
10 Second Club
iTrader: (25)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by KingSS
Brett I have to agree with Jason!! I've read your other posts & they seem pretty low. How about you give the heads time & let some testing get done!
Bret why are you trying to discredit a sponsors product that you've never seen?
Bret why are you trying to discredit a sponsors product that you've never seen?
+1
I will have to agree with Jason as well
#54
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Thanks for the support guys! We're working hard on several different 6.2l packages right now! I just don't get people who act like that...
__________________
Jason
Co-Owner, Texas Speed & Performance, Ltd.
2005 Twin Turbo C6
404cid Stroker, 67mm Twins
994rwhp/902lb ft @ 22 psi (mustang dyno) www.Texas-Speed.com
Jason
Co-Owner, Texas Speed & Performance, Ltd.
2005 Twin Turbo C6
404cid Stroker, 67mm Twins
994rwhp/902lb ft @ 22 psi (mustang dyno) www.Texas-Speed.com
#55
11 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: berkeley ca
Posts: 732
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Wanted to quote this to make sure my question isn't overlooked....
How big are these intake runners?
How big are these intake runners?
Originally Posted by Jason 98 TA
Bret I've read your posts not only in my threads but in other threads in this section. I'm honestly pretty tired of your smart mouth... I don't really know who's agenda your working on, but lets give it a rest! Trust me when I say I have way more time & testing in 6.2l stuff than you do. Our 6.2l head was developed by one of the best LS porters in the country. I've compared it to several different samples that SDPC brought to me & this cylinder head does very well.
I don't know what your problem is, but you bad mouthed the heads in my original post until I deleted the post & reposted it. Now your making hints about the cylinder heads & even calling them "cheap" in another thread.
Lets give it a rest unless you have something positive to say. I don't know what your problem is, but these heads are flowing very well compared to not only stock heads, but also other porters heads.
It's irritating when someone who knows nothing about our product goes out of their way to discredit it. I applogize to everyone having to read Bret's uninformed posts... The typical LS1tech people know I spend a lot of timing making sure we produce great products. The 6.2l head will be no exception!
I don't know what your problem is, but you bad mouthed the heads in my original post until I deleted the post & reposted it. Now your making hints about the cylinder heads & even calling them "cheap" in another thread.
Lets give it a rest unless you have something positive to say. I don't know what your problem is, but these heads are flowing very well compared to not only stock heads, but also other porters heads.
It's irritating when someone who knows nothing about our product goes out of their way to discredit it. I applogize to everyone having to read Bret's uninformed posts... The typical LS1tech people know I spend a lot of timing making sure we produce great products. The 6.2l head will be no exception!
#56
11 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: berkeley ca
Posts: 732
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by Bring the Noise
Okay back to the heads...
What is the Port size increased to with this CNC profile?
Originally Posted by Cheatin' Chad
If you would please consider:
Also:
Providing port size in CC and cross section.
Thank you!
Originally Posted by adams2003
What is the runner size on these heads?
Originally Posted by Nate_Taufer
runner size?
Nate
Nate
Originally Posted by dame
How big are these intake runners?
![Lurk](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies3/lurk.gif)
#57
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
mainly because I'm not at the head right now to check it!
It won't be very far from the stock port size, we worked really hard to keep the runner as small as possible.
![Happy](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_stretch.gif)
![Happy](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_stretch.gif)
__________________
Jason
Co-Owner, Texas Speed & Performance, Ltd.
2005 Twin Turbo C6
404cid Stroker, 67mm Twins
994rwhp/902lb ft @ 22 psi (mustang dyno) www.Texas-Speed.com
Jason
Co-Owner, Texas Speed & Performance, Ltd.
2005 Twin Turbo C6
404cid Stroker, 67mm Twins
994rwhp/902lb ft @ 22 psi (mustang dyno) www.Texas-Speed.com
#58
11 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: berkeley ca
Posts: 732
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by Jason 98 TA
mainly because I'm not at the head right now to check it!
It won't be very far from the stock port size, we worked really hard to keep the runner as small as possible.
![Happy](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_stretch.gif)
![Happy](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_stretch.gif)
You guys post up flow numbers.... but didn't check the runner length
![Icon Confused](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies2/icon_confused.gif)
![Icon Confused](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies2/icon_confused.gif)
Considering the L92 head starts out at 260cc's (if im not mistaken) I'm very interested in this info myself.
#60
Launching!
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Town near you
Posts: 277
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by SStrokerAce
LS1/LS6= 3.900" bore CAN'T USE L92 HEADS
LS2 = 4.00" bore CAN USE L92 HEADS
It sure looks purdy, and that's what sells.
I'd love to say more in this thread but it gets edited
Bret
LS2 = 4.00" bore CAN USE L92 HEADS
It sure looks purdy, and that's what sells.
I'd love to say more in this thread but it gets edited
![Icon Rolleyes](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies2/icon_rolleyes.gif)
Bret
Why don't you cut them a break.They sponsor this board.
![Rolleyes](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/rolleyes.gif)
![Happy](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_stretch.gif)