Generation IV Internal Engine 2005-2014 LS2 | LS3 | LS7 | L92 | LS9

Who is going to buy the new gm lsx block.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-30-2007, 09:53 PM
  #21  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Chicago Crew UnderBoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Elmhurst, IL (Chicago Suburb)
Posts: 1,851
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by verve_v
how many cubes in the short deck version going to be?

454 BABY with a 4.250 bore and 4.00 stroke!!!

Count me in on the LSX I am ALL OVER THIS and probably will go with a tall deck and a perfectly square 482 cubed motor (4.250.00 x 4.250.00)!!!
Old 01-30-2007, 10:50 PM
  #22  
On The Tree
 
tlaselva's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Brampton, Ontario
Posts: 157
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by MTI 427 C5 Roadster
454 BABY with a 4.250 bore and 4.00 stroke!!!

Count me in on the LSX I am ALL OVER THIS and probably will go with a tall deck and a perfectly square 482 cubed motor (4.250.00 x 4.250.00)!!!
Now ur talking my language! Big Cubes!

No replacement for displacement!

Now the issue of finding an intake that's streetable and able to feed that much cubes! I'm going to pay close attention to the Wilson Intake comparo that some tuners were talking about on another post.
Old 01-31-2007, 08:42 AM
  #23  
LS1Tech Sponsor
 
Robin L's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Rockfield Kentucky
Posts: 1,170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Tecknique2006
The article in the newest GMHTP said that the project's engineers were working on an aluminum version of the LSX block. The article seemed to be an interview with a GM representative so I assume the information is correct.

That is correct. Right now though they are concentrating on getting the Iron version out.

Robin
Old 01-31-2007, 09:54 AM
  #24  
7 Second Club
iTrader: (11)
 
Phil99vette's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Port Tobacco, MD
Posts: 8,758
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

I'm not sure I'd max out the bore, what does GM say the wall thickness is when the bore is maxed out @ 4.250
Old 01-31-2007, 11:18 AM
  #25  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (127)
 
NemeSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Houston,TX
Posts: 6,888
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Phil99vette
I'm not sure I'd max out the bore, what does GM say the wall thickness is when the bore is maxed out @ 4.250
advertised as .200 material left between cylinders,

im going strait for the jugular on mine
4.25 bore x 4 in. stroke 454
12.5+ SCR
400+ cfm LS7 heads
single plane GM LS7 with plenum and 105mm tb

if there is not too much of a time delay for the block availability
Old 01-31-2007, 02:11 PM
  #26  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
verve_v's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Kaleva, Michigan
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

You can go as big as 511 cubes on the tall deck version can't you? Even if you can't though, holy ****, it will be one badass small block.
Old 01-31-2007, 10:06 PM
  #27  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
texada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: alexandria, La
Posts: 453
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

How do you think the L92 heads & Intake will work with that big of a bore(4.250)?
Old 01-31-2007, 10:33 PM
  #28  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (14)
 
Cop Car's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Indy
Posts: 2,520
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

poor. if you have a bore of 4.125 or more you need to be using LS7 heads.
Old 02-01-2007, 11:06 AM
  #29  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (26)
 
koolrayz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: mansfield ohio
Posts: 2,644
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Robin L
That is correct. Right now though they are concentrating on getting the Iron version out.

Robin
Will we see the aluminum block this year?
when are they going to anounce the LSX heads that go with these new blocks?
Old 02-01-2007, 10:20 PM
  #30  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
texada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: alexandria, La
Posts: 453
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Cop Car
poor. if you have a bore of 4.125 or more you need to be using LS7 heads.
I am wondering how that can be when L92 heads flows equeal to alot of aftermarket heads. So, are you saying AFR, TFS or Eldebrock heads wouldn't do the trick for these big cubic inch motors
Old 02-01-2007, 11:04 PM
  #31  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (21)
 
Beast96Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Shreveport, LA
Posts: 4,049
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Phil99vette
I'm not sure I'd max out the bore, what does GM say the wall thickness is when the bore is maxed out @ 4.250
Reports claimed .200" at first, but 4.4" bore spacing minus 4.250" bore ='s .150". Personally, I wouldn't max it out on the first go round. I'd say 4.200" on the first pass.
Old 02-02-2007, 01:48 AM
  #32  
Staging Lane
 
Top Secret's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Modesto, CA
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

These blocks are going to be great. I'm honestly a little worried that GM is going to run into supply problems in the beginning. Also, I like how much material is between the cylinders... it makes for a lot of rebuilds.
Old 02-02-2007, 12:19 PM
  #33  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (14)
 
Cop Car's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Indy
Posts: 2,520
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by texada
I am wondering how that can be when L92 heads flows equeal to alot of aftermarket heads. So, are you saying AFR, TFS or Eldebrock heads wouldn't do the trick for these big cubic inch motors
no, most aftermarket heads arent near as good as the GM LS7 heads. the big bore, allows for big valves, and the chamber is shaped diffrently, square ports instead of cathedreal etc. the L92 is a way tamer version of the LS7 head, and GM LS7 heads come CNC'ed. if you have a 4.125 bore or bigger there is no excuse for not using either GM LS7 heads or something like the warhawk or other LS7 heads
Old 02-02-2007, 05:40 PM
  #34  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (21)
 
Beast96Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Shreveport, LA
Posts: 4,049
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Cop Car
if you have a 4.125 bore or bigger there is no excuse for not using either GM LS7 heads or something like the warhawk or other LS7 heads
Assuming your shopping based on price, that's true, otherwise, there are better options IMO.
Old 02-02-2007, 06:10 PM
  #35  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (4)
 
Gordon0652's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,188
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

You can get 511cu out of the block, and it will always stay a small block. I called GM preformance and i asked when they were going to relise the block and nobody had any idea, i was transfered to like 5 people (no joke!) and they never even heard of it, they though it was in a stock Firebird 98-02' and i was like wtf, NO. So they were no help, any idea when it is going to be relised? and since the block does weigh 218.* pounds will that make a huge diffrence in handeling since an AL block weighs about 95-105 pounds.
Old 02-02-2007, 06:47 PM
  #36  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (22)
 
Stang's Bane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Mont Belvieu, TX
Posts: 2,649
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by Beast96Z
Assuming your shopping based on price, that's true, otherwise, there are better options IMO.
I do agree somewhat with you Beast. However, I would llike to see a set of the All pro ls7 hooked up to a sheetmetal with a solid roller and see what that does.

IMHO the biggest thing a budget brings into the equation is the intake. To me, it is a lot easier to spend $3K+ on a set of heads than the same amount on an intake. that is just ME, though.

FWIW when you get your setup running and ironed out, I think we may see a new NA pump gas record for the LSx. IMHO 650+
Old 02-03-2007, 04:13 PM
  #37  
JPH
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (2)
 
JPH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fort Wayne, IN
Posts: 3,776
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

i'll take one.
Old 02-03-2007, 05:13 PM
  #38  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (21)
 
Beast96Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Shreveport, LA
Posts: 4,049
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Stang's Bane
I do agree somewhat with you Beast. However, I would llike to see a set of the All pro ls7 hooked up to a sheetmetal with a solid roller and see what that does.

IMHO the biggest thing a budget brings into the equation is the intake. To me, it is a lot easier to spend $3K+ on a set of heads than the same amount on an intake. that is just ME, though.

FWIW when you get your setup running and ironed out, I think we may see a new NA pump gas record for the LSx. IMHO 650+
Yea, the intake is always hard to drop money on. When we start getting some ported LS7's out there, it may be hard to compete. Seems like not to many people have been going that route latley. I kinda wish there were a few more results myself. As for my car, yea, 650 is sounding nice. anything over will be stunning.
Old 02-03-2007, 05:35 PM
  #39  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (16)
 
ls1muscle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Birmingham, AL
Posts: 577
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Beast96Z,
When is your car gonna be done, that setup is nasty.
Old 02-03-2007, 07:40 PM
  #40  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (21)
 
Beast96Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Shreveport, LA
Posts: 4,049
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

K-member shipped yesterday and valve covers will be here within 2-3 weeks hopefully. I would like a early March crank up myself.


Quick Reply: Who is going to buy the new gm lsx block.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:34 PM.