408 L92 231/235 LSK CTSV is back on the dyno...
03-08-2007, 05:49 PM
#1
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Murrieta Ca.
Posts: 1,676
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
408 L92 231/235 LSK CTSV is back on the dyno... as I type getting a retune......engine is broken in and the driveline issue has been fixed. It looks like it's making alittle more power than last time 
[IMG]
[/IMG]
[IMG]
[/IMG] Last edited by 2c5s; 03-08-2007 at 08:49 PM.
03-08-2007, 07:45 PM
#6
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Murrieta Ca.
Posts: 1,676
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by WKMCD
Good luck Chris!!!A/F was a bit off from our previous 2:00 a.m. tune and it took 3' more timing. I guess flopping input shaft's are a bad thing.
497 rwhp 481 rwt
5,900 rpm 4,600 rpm
It makes 395 rwt @ 2,600 rpm, 445 rwt @3,000 and peaks 481rwt @ 4,600.
I'll try and get a dyno sheet up shortly.
Stock port L92 heads, 11 to 1 C.R.
03-08-2007, 08:06 PM
#7
Originally Posted by 2c5s
THANKS, RESULTS ARE IN..
A/F was a bit off from our previous 2:00 a.m. tune and it took 3' more timing. I guess flopping input shaft's are a bad thing.
497 rwhp 481 rwt
5,900 rpm 4,600 rpm
It makes 395 rwt @ 2,600 rpm, 445 rwt @3,000 and peaks 481rwt @ 4,600.
I'll try and get a dyno sheet up shortly.
Stock port L92 heads, 11 to 1 C.R.
A/F was a bit off from our previous 2:00 a.m. tune and it took 3' more timing. I guess flopping input shaft's are a bad thing.
497 rwhp 481 rwt
5,900 rpm 4,600 rpm
It makes 395 rwt @ 2,600 rpm, 445 rwt @3,000 and peaks 481rwt @ 4,600.
I'll try and get a dyno sheet up shortly.
Stock port L92 heads, 11 to 1 C.R.
Trending Topics
03-08-2007, 09:20 PM
#12
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Murrieta Ca.
Posts: 1,676
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Quik
and this is in a caddy, thats freaking great!!! no body woudl expect thsi thing
The best thing is pulling up to a light and watching people break their necks looking around for the "noise". Once they figure it out, the look is priceless.
03-08-2007, 11:37 PM
#18
On The Tree
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Brampton, Ontario
Posts: 157
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by bcs
Great..Now go port them.
On a 408ci motor, you may actually hurt the torque, especially down low if you port them. Remember, flow numbers isn't everything, you also have to keep in mind port velocity.
03-09-2007, 05:46 AM
#19
Originally Posted by tlaselva
Got to be careful about that.
On a 408ci motor, you may actually hurt the torque, especially down low if you port them. Remember, flow numbers isn't everything, you also have to keep in mind port velocity.
On a 408ci motor, you may actually hurt the torque, especially down low if you port them. Remember, flow numbers isn't everything, you also have to keep in mind port velocity.
03-09-2007, 06:06 AM
#20
Originally Posted by tlaselva
Got to be careful about that.
On a 408ci motor, you may actually hurt the torque, especially down low if you port them. Remember, flow numbers isn't everything, you also have to keep in mind port velocity.
On a 408ci motor, you may actually hurt the torque, especially down low if you port them. Remember, flow numbers isn't everything, you also have to keep in mind port velocity.
Did ya happen to read the otha thread?
https://ls1tech.com/forums/generation-iv-internal-engine/662314-l92-dynojet-numbers-plus-plan-b-c-d-e-f.html
Which (BTW Kevin) has over 10,000 views!
