Generation IV Internal Engine 2005-2014 LS2 | LS3 | LS7 | L92 | LS9

Convince me to build LS instead of BBC!!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-06-2007, 03:57 PM
  #61  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
nmp27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Fayetteville, AR
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Twin76mmTA
Good luck making the same power as a BBC with a ls motor for the same price and have it be realiable, In the end there is no replacement for displacment.
On the 8th day he said: Let there be Forced Induction
Old 11-06-2007, 04:00 PM
  #62  
TECH Veteran
 
Quickin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL, USA
Posts: 4,117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by KHShapiro
Quickin, while i have agreed with most of the things you posted, i do not agree with your statement about how an LS will never be as good as a BBC.
An LSx engine will never be able to produce the power of a BBC with the same reliability and DRIVABILITY. Cube-for-cube....OR....all-out max builds for each. NEVER. They will never move anywhere near the air as a BBC, SO SIMPLE.


stock vs stock LS series is on another level.
Nobody here has ever mentioned stock-for-stock...OR...stock AT ALL.

and yes a LS7 is better than a BBC 427.
If can put this in his '70 Chevelle for basically the same price when all is said and done and *** rape the LS7 if he installed that. Upgrade the heads on the 572 and he'll have a reliable engine that will make more power than any LS7 ever has or ever will...AND STILL BE A DAILY DRIVER with RELIABILITY. The LS7 will be on the verge of exploding at any time if built to the hilt.

http://www.crateenginedepot.com/stor...6YNIRmCaeC6fIs

an LS7 is what 11k complete
$15,000+ when all is said and done from what I've seen on this forum. And then you're sitting with stock hp, 450 RWHP What fun is that. In a big heavy Chevelle, it'll be a dog. He would have to give it to a builder, along with $10,000 to make it what he needs.


.
Old 11-06-2007, 04:25 PM
  #63  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (10)
 
KHShapiro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: SW Florida
Posts: 906
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Quickin
cube-for-cube a BBC 427 will KILL any LSx 427. Its all about the heads and intake, apparently you don't know what BBC heads can do. The LS7 heads are total GARBAGE compared to the heads available for BBC.

Good luck even hanging close to a BBC 427 with any LSx 427..
that was post # 56
Originally Posted by Quickin
Nobody here has ever mentioned stock-for-stock...OR...stock AT ALL.
.
You started comparing

Looks like its carb to me so add for the ECM Injectors and manifold. what does that bring it to now??? how much more than an LS7 and whats the weight difference?

try talking about the obvious , head design, weight , piston angle. pros and cons. whats the hp rating per hundred pounds.


While no doubt BBC's have more potential to make more power due to larger cubes. there is no reason why you cant build an LS for around ( everyone has there own around figure) the same price as a BBC, for what it is that you are looking to do . you have your mind set on a BBC thats great there is nothing wrong with that and i dont think anyone in there right minds would tell you other wise. But dont think for a second that LS motors arent capible of big numbers too, apples to apples (CI) the LS series is a better design.
Old 11-06-2007, 04:27 PM
  #64  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (22)
 
Stang's Bane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Mont Belvieu, TX
Posts: 2,649
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by Quickin
$15,000+ when all is said and done from what I've seen on this forum. And then you're sitting with stock hp, 450 RWHP What fun is that. In a big heavy Chevelle, it'll be a dog. He would have to give it to a builder, along with $10,000 to make it what he needs.


.
Or he could just give a builder $15K and have over 600 rwhp NA and another 200 with a bottle.

You can build 1000 fwhp with a ls motor reliably for under 20K.
Old 11-06-2007, 04:30 PM
  #65  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (22)
 
Stang's Bane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Mont Belvieu, TX
Posts: 2,649
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by Quickin
Whats the difference in weight from the original iron block that came with the '70 Chevelle, compared with an aluminum BBC today? Not much I would guess.


.
Hve you priced a AL BBC??? Not cheap.

A BBC block will be heavier than a comparable CI ls block, it has to because it is physically a larger engine.
Old 11-06-2007, 04:31 PM
  #66  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (10)
 
KHShapiro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: SW Florida
Posts: 906
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

oh and C6 zo6's stock, on stock tires have broken into the 10's.
There one in my garage thats 11.17 , with 1.8060ft , stock.
Yes its a ligher car, a much lighter car.
a nice shot of NOS or some psi in a Chevelle , will be a low 10 maybe 9sec ride witht he right chassis set-up.

Last edited by KHShapiro; 11-06-2007 at 04:35 PM. Reason: sentence was misleading
Old 11-06-2007, 05:02 PM
  #67  
TECH Veteran
 
Quickin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL, USA
Posts: 4,117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by KHShapiro
that was post # 56
But that's true. A BBC 427 will kill an LSx 427. There's not a head made on the planet that can feed 427 cubic inches for an LSx engine. But a BBC 427 has heads available to OUT-feed 427 cubic inches. That means much more power. And being a BBC it will be MUCH stronger and last MUCH longer.

Is this not a fact.

You started comparing
I never compared stock engine. Stock engines are useless to everyone here.


Looks like its carb to me so add for the ECM Injectors and manifold. what does that bring it to now??? how much more than an LS7 and whats the weight difference?
He's gonna drive it 5,000 miles a year, I think if it reaches his goals, he won't care about carb or EFI.

try talking about the obvious , head design, weight , piston angle. pros and cons. whats the hp rating per hundred pounds.
I am.
Hundreds of pounds...Its a '70 Chevelle. The original iron block that was in there can't be much different than an aluminum BBC block today.
Heads, BBC heads KILL any LSx head.
Piston angle...what does that have to do with anything????


.
Old 11-06-2007, 05:06 PM
  #68  
TECH Veteran
 
Quickin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL, USA
Posts: 4,117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Stang's Bane
Or he could just give a builder $15K and have over 600 rwhp NA and another 200 with a bottle.
How about under $13,000 plus a 200 shot. And have much more reliability than a maxed out pump gas 600 RWHP LSx.
http://www.crateenginedepot.com/stor...6YNIRmCaeC6fIs

You can build 1000 fwhp with a ls motor reliably for under 20K.
I don't know man, over the past year or so, I've seen nothing but explosions and failures with all the TT LSx's and SC'ed big horsepower LSx's. No need to name members with these failed LSx big power engines. And all were less than 1,000 FWHP.


.
Old 11-06-2007, 05:17 PM
  #69  
TECH Apprentice
 
ss dave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Wichita, Ks.
Posts: 322
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

On weight, I replaced my iron SBC 383 with a LS7 and had to cut the springs to lower the car to the right height due to decreased weight, about 150# less than a SB.
Old 11-06-2007, 05:18 PM
  #70  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (22)
 
Stang's Bane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Mont Belvieu, TX
Posts: 2,649
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by Quickin
How about under $13,000 plus a 200 shot. And have much more reliability than a maxed out pump gas 600 RWHP LSx.
http://www.crateenginedepot.com/stor...6YNIRmCaeC6fIs



I don't know man, over the past year or so, I've seen nothing but explosions and failures with all the TT LSx's and SC'ed big horsepower LSx's. No need to name members with these failed LSx big power engines. And all were less than 1,000 FWHP.


.
The link is dead. Are you talking about the 720R/572? If you are that engine requires race gas. And the weight on that thing is killer..


Like I said, a BBC has a higher power potential than a ls motor. CI rule. That cannot be denied. All else being equal though, I will take a small block over a big block. When I said all else, I mean a comparable set of heads, compression, and intake. It will make the same if not more power and the weight difference makes even more of a difference. If you are looking at a 200 lb weight diffenrence, then you would need to make at least 50-75 more hp to run equal times. That is not even taking into account the location of the weight, which is in the worst possible place, over the front tires.
Old 11-06-2007, 05:56 PM
  #71  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (10)
 
KHShapiro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: SW Florida
Posts: 906
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Quickin
A BBC 427 will kill an LSx 427. There's not a head made on the planet that can feed 427 cubic inches for an LSx engine. But a BBC 427 has heads available to OUT-feed 427 cubic inches. That means much more power. ..
Hmmmm that so…… Tell that to ETP, AFR, DART.Damnit , I should chuck mine away..

Originally Posted by Quickin
And being a BBC it will be MUCH stronger and last MUCH longer
why is this?

Originally Posted by Quickin
I never compared stock engine. Stock engines are useless to everyone here..
You maded a statement about 427 bbc vs. a 427 ls which if im not mistaken they make a LS7 . But i guess i have to take the blame here on that because i assumed you where refering to the LS7
I pretty sure with equal amounts of money I could build a LSX 427 that would out perform the BBC 427 with , again equal amounts of money thrown at it, beyond stock versions



Originally Posted by Quickin
He's gonna drive it 5,000 miles a year, I think if it reaches his goals, he won't care about carb or EFI..
Whats it gonna be EFI or Carb are we allowed to adjust the prices now or is that just for the BBC?



Originally Posted by Quickin
Hundreds of pounds...Its a '70 Chevelle. The original iron block that was in there can't be much different than an aluminum BBC block today.
Heads, BBC heads KILL any LSx head.
Piston angle...what does that have to do with anything???? .
Hundreds of pounds , BBC weights way more than an LS series
I dont know what the difference is between the Iron BBC and the Aluminum BBC block is but whats the price difference? how much more money does that add up to on your BBC build, and its still heavier than an LS
Heads are totally different, again I think ETP , AFR and others would fight you on this.
Piston angle , was a mistake I was referring to the head angle as in my pervious post .

what do you want Quickin? YES a BBC can acheive more than an LS once you pass the limits of the CI limitations on the LS blocks. but not before.

There are pleanty of LSX out there in the 1000hp range, search button works wonders, and its about the same price as the BBC versions.
Old 11-06-2007, 06:15 PM
  #72  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (10)
 
KHShapiro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: SW Florida
Posts: 906
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

gearhead1186 , for ease of the build i would prob do a BBC .
Why, cost. what cost, the cost of the conversion and hunting down parts. getting the engine right where you want it and not some company that sends you motor plates and tells you where they want you to have it. Headers, where do you get LS headers for a G-body.. ( it is a G-body right, chevelle?) did you car come with a BBC , maybe you wont have to change springs. Converting to late model regs can be costly and very time consuming. Stick with the BBC idea, either way it doesnt really matter how you get there just as long as you do... 9sec will be in your future anyway with a proper build.
Good Luck to you
Old 11-06-2007, 06:33 PM
  #73  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (3)
 
PICNIC_GEORGE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Sparks NV
Posts: 318
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Quickin
But that's true. A BBC 427 will kill an LSx 427. There's not a head made on the planet that can feed 427 cubic inches for an LSx engine. But a BBC 427 has heads available to OUT-feed 427 cubic inches. That means much more power. And being a BBC it will be MUCH stronger and last MUCH longer.
I doubt much stronger if any. The heads are bigger(NOT BETTER) and the bore spacing is larger which are in the BBCs favor. The weight and and valve train geometry are not in the big blocks favor.

Originally Posted by Quickin
Hundreds of pounds...Its a '70 Chevelle. The original iron block that was in there can't be much different than an aluminum BBC block today.
Heads, BBC heads KILL any LSx head.
Piston angle...what does that have to do with anything????
The original 454 block in a 70 chevelle was slightly over 300lbs I believe. An aftermarket aluminum big block is around 100 give or take. The old cast cranks were heavy as hell. There is a big difference.
Stock BBC heads don't kill stock ls7 heads. But a bad *** set of 360 trick flows do...

I agree with the rod angle ratio. Its not that big of a deal.

When you get a 235cc head for an LSX and a 357cc head for a BBC there is a big difference. But the 235cc LSX heads usually aren't that far off flow wise to a 345+cc big block head.
Old 11-06-2007, 06:37 PM
  #74  
TECH Enthusiast
 
slammer454's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 606
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

There isa defenite price advantage using a BBC. But your going to ave to sacrifice in the weight category. But you can make 600HP for 10K with a BBC, and on pump. My boss copied an engine out of super chevy recently, he simply took a original block, prepped it, and then used an Eagle rotating assembly and an Edelbrock top end kit. We haven;t dyno'd it yet, but SC pulled 606HP and 598 TQ at 5500 RPM, Pretty impressive.

Originally Posted by IFRYRCE
Wow...

A 427 LSx will WHIP a 427 BBC. The ENGINE is better, and cube for cube, there's no contest. The fact that the BBC can be expanded for more cubes (only a matter of time before the tall-deck LSx takes 'em down, too) doesn't make it better, it makes it bigger. Not saying the BBC isn't a good engine, but there's a reason we're using 6.0s and 6.2s in Trucks now instead of the old 8.1L BBC.
true, remember the pump gas drags? 414 CI on spray vs. 606 CI HEMI N/A. guess who won? 414 on spray.
Old 11-06-2007, 06:41 PM
  #75  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (10)
 
KHShapiro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: SW Florida
Posts: 906
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by slammer454
true, remember the pump gas drags? 414 CI on spray vs. 606 CI HEMI N/A. guess who won? 414 on spray.

Not to be an *** but you cant compare that with things being equal.
Just like you cant really compare a 1/4 car and an 1/8 mile car when reading there time slips.
Old 11-06-2007, 06:49 PM
  #76  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (3)
 
PICNIC_GEORGE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Sparks NV
Posts: 318
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by KHShapiro
Hundreds of pounds , BBC weights way more than an LS series
I dont know what the difference is between the Iron BBC and the Aluminum BBC block is but whats the price difference? how much more money does that add up to on your BBC build, and its still heavier than an LS
Heads are totally different, again I think ETP , AFR and others would fight you on this.
Piston angle , was a mistake I was referring to the head angle as in my pervious post .

what do you want Quickin? YES a BBC can acheive more than an LS once you pass the limits of the CI limitations on the LS blocks. but not before.
My bad I thought you were talking about rod ratio. The valve angle is better on an LSX and so is the geometry. That's why you don't need 350cc heads to flow 350cfm at .600 lift. Much more efficient for sure.

Weight difference between an iron big block and all aluminum small block is HUGE.

But like said no replacement for displacement. Big blocks will always make more power.
Old 11-06-2007, 06:52 PM
  #77  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (13)
 
Orr89rocz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Pittsburgh PA
Posts: 665
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

this thread makes me want to go bigblock for my Camaro. lol
Old 11-06-2007, 06:52 PM
  #78  
Launching!
 
Busted Knuckles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 266
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Stang's Bane
Hve you priced a AL BBC??? Not cheap.
You can build an LS2 stroker longblock for not much more than a Brodix aluminum block costs - close to $5K and it will STILL be heavier than an LS engine. Dart has a CNC big block that is one beautiful piece of engineering but costs upwards of $10K,

I don't think we'll ever see an LS series engine taking the place of the sure 'nuff big-inch engines, but for the majority of bracket racers in the 9 second range, the big block's days as ruler of the roost are just about over.

There's still nothing like a big-inch big block tucked between the framerails of a muscle car. Put a huffer on it and it becomes pretty much unstreetable, though.

IMHO, they're both here to stay for the forseeable future. It's a matter of preference, both can make more reliable power than you can hope to hook up.

Hell, I'm gonna build one of each - the LS for my Corvette and a 565 for a shortwide street truck. They'll have completely different manners but both will serve the purpose they were built for quite well.
Old 11-06-2007, 07:02 PM
  #79  
TECH Veteran
 
Quickin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL, USA
Posts: 4,117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by KHShapiro
what do you want Quickin? YES a BBC can acheive more than an LS once you pass the limits of the CI limitations on the LS blocks. but not before.
Its not just cubic inches that are an advantage over a LSx. The heads on a BBC 427 will allow it to make ALOT more power than the BEST LSx heads on an LSx 427......................don't you agree with that?

There are pleanty of LSX out there in the 1000hp range, search button works wonders, and its about the same price as the BBC versions.
If you're talking about the GM iron LSX, it'll be pretty damn reliable. But an aluminum 1,000 hp LSx is running at its limits and is not as reliable as a BBC at 1,000 hp. Nowhere near.

And its not me that wants the BBC, the thread started does, I'm waiting on a tall deck iron LSX to do my 481ci so it'll bolt right into my WS6. If a badass 1,000 hp PUMP GAS 632 BBC would fit without a crazy amount of fabbing, I would definitely do it!!!!!!

.
Old 11-06-2007, 07:20 PM
  #80  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (10)
 
KHShapiro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: SW Florida
Posts: 906
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Quickin
Its not just cubic inches that are an advantage over a LSx. The heads on a BBC 427 will allow it to make ALOT more power than the BEST LSx heads on an LSx 427......................don't you agree with that?.
I don't. But i am not an engineer either. Maybe AFR , DART or ETP might step in and post up. i am more than happy to be shown something that i think is right to be proven wrong.


Originally Posted by Quickin
If you're talking about the GM iron LSX, it'll be pretty damn reliable. But an aluminum 1,000 hp LSx is running at its limits and is not as reliable as a BBC at 1,000 hp. Nowhere near.

.
Can you list some examples of LSX aluminum Block failures. just the block and not a part that broke and cracked the block. I know of one , which wasnt a failure so to speak. When W2W ( i think it was W2W, maybe it was Katech) tore down a motor that was in the 1400 FWHP range they noticed the mains started to walk and suggested putting a girld on to prevent that from happening.

Last edited by KHShapiro; 11-06-2007 at 07:28 PM.


Quick Reply: Convince me to build LS instead of BBC!!!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:15 AM.