Generation IV Internal Engine 2005-2014 LS2 | LS3 | LS7 | L92 | LS9

iron block vs. aluminum

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-10-2007, 04:06 PM
  #21  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
black_z's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Midwest
Posts: 3,324
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by kistlerjm9
i like the straight forward answer but i dont think it helps him make a decision if you have no explanation lol. either way its still better than a ricer or ford.
Weight is the only explanation. The strength argument isn't really valid here, it isn't in 99% of street builds.
Old 12-10-2007, 07:31 PM
  #22  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (18)
 
steve40's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: windsor, on
Posts: 338
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

it looks like i'm going with an iron block....found one for next to nothing...i know its heavier...but its just a street car for me...just wanted to see if there was a clear reason why not to go one way or the other.
Old 12-10-2007, 07:44 PM
  #23  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (31)
 
sroach20's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: houston, Texas
Posts: 2,318
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

youll be good with it, i have no problems with the added weight.
Old 12-10-2007, 08:44 PM
  #24  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
White_Hawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Pontiac, MI
Posts: 1,364
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by steve40
it looks like i'm going with an iron block....found one for next to nothing...i know its heavier...but its just a street car for me...just wanted to see if there was a clear reason why not to go one way or the other.
Iron block F T W. No clearancing necessary for a 4" stroke! And you can run the LS6 valley cover without modification too!

I picked up a dealer takeout for piston slap. Got the complete long block for $300. Just put in a tubular K with it and the weight is pretty much a wash.

-Geoff

p.s. What is up with the edit on F T W without spaces? It shows up like this --> ***
Old 12-10-2007, 10:52 PM
  #25  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
SILVERZZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: South,Alabama
Posts: 424
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Just do a 7.0 iron block
Old 12-10-2007, 10:55 PM
  #26  
Teching In
 
'68maro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I like the LQ9>LS2. The LQ9 is a LOT cheaper, and it can hold more power. Plus, you gain a little extra cubes out of it...
Old 12-10-2007, 11:12 PM
  #27  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
Abdullah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Kuwait
Posts: 1,455
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by steve40
i have a lt1 car and looking into building a 6.0 with the l92/l72 top end combination. just looking for advice on what block to start with. what advantages do each offer?

thanks
steve
for L92 heads/L76 intake i would better go with L92 block or larger bore block.
Old 12-10-2007, 11:13 PM
  #28  
Sawzall and Welder Mod
iTrader: (46)
 
Whistler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 2,488
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

The tubular K and A arms together might make up half the weight difference between the iron and aluminum.... But then you can run the same K and A arms with the Al. block and be even lighter!

The only time I would choose the iron is if the vehicle were a dedicated track car running 8s or faster. And then it would be an LSX, not a 4 bolter.

F T W is blanked out because it is overused and played the f**k out.


Originally Posted by White_Hawk
Iron block F T W. No clearancing necessary for a 4" stroke! And you can run the LS6 valley cover without modification too!

I picked up a dealer takeout for piston slap. Got the complete long block for $300. Just put in a tubular K with it and the weight is pretty much a wash.

-Geoff

p.s. What is up with the edit on F T W without spaces? It shows up like this --> ***
Old 12-10-2007, 11:15 PM
  #29  
Sawzall and Welder Mod
iTrader: (46)
 
Whistler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 2,488
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Extra cubes? They're identical dimensionally.
Originally Posted by '68maro
I like the LQ9>LS2. The LQ9 is a LOT cheaper, and it can hold more power. Plus, you gain a little extra cubes out of it...
Old 12-11-2007, 04:42 PM
  #30  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (18)
 
steve40's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: windsor, on
Posts: 338
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by White_Hawk
Iron block F T W. No clearancing necessary for a 4" stroke! And you can run the LS6 valley cover without modification too!

I picked up a dealer takeout for piston slap. Got the complete long block for $300. Just put in a tubular K with it and the weight is pretty much a wash.

-Geoff

p.s. What is up with the edit on F T W without spaces? It shows up like this --> ***
whats so special about the ls6 valley cover?
Old 12-11-2007, 05:33 PM
  #31  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (31)
 
sroach20's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: houston, Texas
Posts: 2,318
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by steve40
whats so special about the ls6 valley cover?
it draws its vacuum for the pcv from the valley area where its less likely to suck oil through the pcv system.
Old 12-12-2007, 04:41 AM
  #32  
TECH Resident
 
njc.corp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 952
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool

Originally Posted by sroach20
it draws its vacuum for the pcv from the valley area where its less likely to suck oil through the pcv system.
correct-
Old 12-12-2007, 06:48 AM
  #33  
Launching!
iTrader: (44)
 
408z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Greensboro, North Carolina
Posts: 286
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by Whistler
Extra cubes? They're identical dimensionally.
Yep....but you can bore the iron block .060 over if you wanted to. The aluminum you cant.
Old 12-12-2007, 07:17 AM
  #34  
Sawzall and Welder Mod
iTrader: (46)
 
Whistler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 2,488
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

You can also buy an L92/LS3 block and get a 4.06 to start with if that's the bore you want
Old 12-12-2007, 09:18 AM
  #35  
Launching!
 
silver01z06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Arlington, TX
Posts: 286
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

The iron block will be cheaper to buy and cheaper in the long run. The Aluminum blocks will be lighter and take extra work on install/wiring. When I was looking at doing a motor it was about 600-800 less to do an iron block. As far as strength of the block its not an issue imo.
Old 12-12-2007, 01:23 PM
  #36  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
fastvet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: !!!!TEXAS!!!!
Posts: 588
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

If you decide to go forced induction or max out the spray, you would want to go with a iron block. lets say you have an iron block with 8.5:1 compression vs an aluminum block 8.5:1 compression. you would be able to put a 20lb. pulley on the iron block but only about 16 safely on the aluminum. Call a pro shop a find out the facts. thats my opinion.
Old 12-12-2007, 01:52 PM
  #37  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (41)
 
Bad Blue WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Germantown Hills IL
Posts: 2,003
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Iron block F T W. No clearancing necessary for a 4" stroke! And you can run the LS6 valley cover without modification too
??? I have an Aluminum LS1,,i put the LS6 valley cover on and it was a direct bolt and go,,no hacking, chopping, etc.
Old 12-12-2007, 02:30 PM
  #38  
Banned
iTrader: (19)
 
Bryan @ Speed Inc.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: chitown
Posts: 1,879
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Bad Blue WS6
??? I have an Aluminum LS1,,i put the LS6 valley cover on and it was a direct bolt and go,,no hacking, chopping, etc.
yes but it's not the case with an ls2 block if he wanted to go that route.
Old 12-12-2007, 02:39 PM
  #39  
TECH Enthusiast
 
JHL88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: SC
Posts: 535
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

iron block takes better to heat than aluminum block
Old 12-12-2007, 02:45 PM
  #40  
Sawzall and Welder Mod
iTrader: (46)
 
Whistler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 2,488
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

By heat... do you mean like if you tried to melt it with an acetylene torch? Yeah... you're probably right.


Originally Posted by JHL88
iron block takes better to heat than aluminum block


Quick Reply: iron block vs. aluminum



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:58 PM.