Generation IV Internal Engine 2005-2014 LS2 | LS3 | LS7 | L92 | LS9

Mild, driveable cam for 402 but want over 520RWHP

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-03-2008, 03:15 AM
  #81  
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
LSGunZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pasadena, CA
Posts: 2,451
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Dmoney
I've ran my stock fuel pump in my 402 for over a year and a half (6,000 miles) with no issues, and plenty of track passes. I'll be upgrading soon, but only cuz I'll be adding nitrous...........
well that sounds like good news to me, until I change my fuel pump..

and I made a new thread, since this thread has gotten congested..

https://ls1tech.com/forums/generation-iv-internal-engine/875061-want-reuse-my-heads.html
Old 03-03-2008, 02:27 PM
  #82  
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
LSGunZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pasadena, CA
Posts: 2,451
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Patrick G
Here it is in a nutshell. When you use the Tv3 and the same heads in a 402, you will make virtually the same rwhp as before, but with 65-70 more rwtq. The airflow of your intake and heads, coupled with the valve events of your cam determine your hp potential. You will make around the same hp but at a lower rpm peak.
Honestly that sounds a bit strange.. If I make more torque, I should be making more HP.. since the formula for HP is Tq X rpm/5252...

but it makes sense if I make it at a lower RPM peak..
Old 03-03-2008, 09:26 PM
  #83  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (7)
 
gold98Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: south point,OH
Posts: 755
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

ive seen back to back dyno of a SB350 and then a 383 stroker using the exact same setup(heads,cam,intake,carb) and the tq sounds about right as it made about 60 ft lb more. tho it didnt make that much more HP it did increase about 40 average thruout the power curve. this was at the crank tho
Old 03-03-2008, 10:24 PM
  #84  
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
LSGunZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pasadena, CA
Posts: 2,451
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by gold98Z28
ive seen back to back dyno of a SB350 and then a 383 stroker using the exact same setup(heads,cam,intake,carb) and the tq sounds about right as it made about 60 ft lb more. tho it didnt make that much more HP it did increase about 40 average thruout the power curve. this was at the crank tho
well all this information made me realiza I can still run a Torquer 3 and the 5.3 heads with a L92/LS3 and even a LS7 if I desired. So thats what I may just do, until I can afford better heads for that application, better headers, a better intake manifold, a different cam, etc...

but I still will upgrade my injectors. what should I go with? and what spark plugs? thanks...

for a 402 - 427 cid run with he same heads and cam I have now...
Old 03-04-2008, 04:30 AM
  #85  
Teching In
 
C&CBird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

You can't run an LS7 intake on 5.3 heads, it fits LS7 heads only. Same goes with L92/LS3, they won't fit cathedral port heads, like your 5.3s.
Old 03-04-2008, 04:01 PM
  #86  
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
LSGunZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pasadena, CA
Posts: 2,451
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by C&CBird
You can't run an LS7 intake on 5.3 heads, it fits LS7 heads only. Same goes with L92/LS3, they won't fit cathedral port heads, like your 5.3s.
Im not saying the intake. Im saying the 5.3 heads on the LS7 block or L92 block..
Old 03-05-2008, 01:37 PM
  #87  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (7)
 
MSGHUFF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Fayetteville, NC
Posts: 260
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

My 402 build with soundclips/track times/specs here: https://ls1tech.com/forums/showthrea...284&highlight=

small cam, small heads great drivability
Old 03-05-2008, 05:37 PM
  #88  
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
LSGunZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pasadena, CA
Posts: 2,451
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by MSGHUFF
My 402 build with soundclips/track times/specs here: https://ls1tech.com/forums/showthrea...284&highlight=

small cam, small heads great drivability
Thanks man, but im goin with a damn 418 now... well Im not mad about it, but i just changed my mind so much...
Old 03-07-2008, 10:31 AM
  #89  
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
LSGunZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pasadena, CA
Posts: 2,451
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by landonew
Here is what you do. Trade in those heads for some AFRs, TFs, or ETPs. Get a Fast 90/90 and decent LTs. Keep the compression the same. This will allow you to do a milder cam, and still get the performance you want. Otherwise, you will have to go BIG cam and even then it's a shot in the dark getting to 520rwhp. There was a thread on here, and the average 402 was dynoing at just over 500 rwhp.
Texas speed wont take back my 5.3 heads...



Quick Reply: Mild, driveable cam for 402 but want over 520RWHP



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:41 PM.