Generation IV Internal Engine 2005-2014 LS2 | LS3 | LS7 | L92 | LS9

L92/L76 427 results and questions (*edit, big gains later)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-28-2008, 01:55 AM
  #21  
Teching In
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
esams's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I was kind of looking forward to seeing how bad my entire combo in the S10 was holding it back, but with the surging and bucking, I can't resist but to try to do this thing right in the car with the next tune. Looks like I'm going 232/238/.615/607/113. I am also going to send back the Magnaflow and trade it for the TSP duals with Magnaflows. I didn't see that you could select your muffler which was dumb on my part.

Next post will be it's dyno curve in 2 to 4 weeks, and if successful I will give full credit to he who speceth it Thank you again gentlemen!
Old 05-28-2008, 08:27 AM
  #22  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (2)
 
WKMCD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 3,416
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

This should almost be required reading for L92 head builds.

https://ls1tech.com/forums/generation-iv-internal-engine/662314-l92-dynojet-numbers-plus-plan-b-c-d-e-f.html
Old 05-28-2008, 10:30 AM
  #23  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (12)
 
bandit1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Utah
Posts: 647
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

yep I agree ^^^^^^^^^^

Good luck and keep us informed
Old 05-28-2008, 10:49 AM
  #24  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (2)
 
sixt9er's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Oakland, CA
Posts: 506
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Slowhawk
The Cam is too big for the heads. Seems like we see a post like this everyday -overcammed L92 headed vehicle.
That being said, what should a good all-around L92 head cam spec at? I am building a N/A 408, with 10.8 comp. ratio, GM 4bbl intake, and looking to spec a cam. My goal is at least 550hp at the flywheel. Drivability is not that important to me, as i have several other cars to make-up for it. Are my goal a dream with a N/A, L92 headed engine with about 11:1 compression?
Old 05-28-2008, 01:26 PM
  #25  
Banned
iTrader: (11)
 
LS123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Rowing 6 speeds Maryland
Posts: 376
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by sixt9er
That being said, what should a good all-around L92 head cam spec at? I am building a N/A 408, with 10.8 comp. ratio, GM 4bbl intake, and looking to spec a cam. My goal is at least 550hp at the flywheel. Drivability is not that important to me, as i have several other cars to make-up for it. Are my goal a dream with a N/A, L92 headed engine with about 11:1 compression?
That would be too easy especially if you are not worried about drivability. There are 40X N/A cars putting that down at the wheels. 550 FWH = 460 RWHP. 23X/24X .63X/.63x 112 should work IMO.
Old 07-08-2008, 11:35 PM
  #26  
Teching In
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
esams's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Just a follow up to this guys....

The Trans Am is up and running with a base tune that is 95% done, it just needs to hit the rollers to dial the timing in. The new cam along with the better intake and exhaust setup make it not even seem possible to be the same engine that was in my S10. It used to pull a 91kpa vacuum at the higher rpm's, and now it doesn't get below 99, which makes me wonder how restrictive the L76 intake really is.

Patrick G probably spec'd the cam to work with the intake and head combo and not just the heads, but it will be very interesting to see what the aftermarket FAST or Weiand intakes really do for these setups that are otherwise free flowing.

I have never driven or ridden in anything with this much power before, and it is insane to blow the tires away at 80mph. Some of that is attributed to the lighter drivetrain / 6 speed and the intake/exhaust, but much HAS to be the cam. The fun factor and the average power are through the roof compared to before, plus the sputtering and backfiring is gone and the drivability isn't much compromised.

Next I will post dyno graphs and video to compare and we can speculate what did what.

Erik
Old 07-08-2008, 11:58 PM
  #27  
Teching In
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
esams's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default L92 L76 427 questions and results

Volant intake with full seal against hood
Texas Speed 100mm MAF (extra assurance that 85mm maf wouldn't restrict)
Texas Speed 1 7/8 headers (bad to the bone, they nailed those)
3" true duals run under axle with 4 Magnaflow mufflers, 2 ovals, 2 resonators(amazingly quiet for what it is. That is what I wanted. Quietest exhaust possible without robbing power)

Last edited by esams; 12-16-2009 at 10:33 AM.
Old 07-09-2008, 09:44 AM
  #28  
TECH Enthusiast
 
1ORANGEWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Chattanooga,TN
Posts: 736
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by esams
Volant intake with full seal against hood
Texas Speed 100mm MAF (extra assurance that 85mm maf wouldn't restrict)
Texas Speed 1 7/8 headers (bad to the bone, they nailed those)
3" true duals run under axle with 4 Magnaflow mufflers, 2 ovals, 2 resonators(amazingly quiet for what it is. That is what I wanted. Quietest exhaust possible without robbing power)
Can you take some pics of the exhaust setup?
Old 07-09-2008, 11:58 PM
  #29  
Teching In
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
esams's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

He had to beat the **** out of the area under the rear seats to get the ovals tucked up enough.

Last edited by esams; 12-16-2009 at 10:33 AM.
Old 07-10-2008, 01:50 PM
  #30  
TECH Enthusiast
 
1ORANGEWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Chattanooga,TN
Posts: 736
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by esams
He had to beat the **** out of the area under the rear seats to get the ovals tucked up enough.
Thanks for the pics. I have seen quite a few people with the TDs run under the axle and I have always wonder if they had any issue with hard launches with their exhausts. I know that sounds crazy.
Old 07-10-2008, 03:44 PM
  #31  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (25)
 
03 BUSA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Kannapolis, NC
Posts: 2,554
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Curious on cam specs that Pat G came up for ya.
Old 07-11-2008, 10:51 AM
  #32  
Teching In
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
esams's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

232/238/615/607/113+2 . Hitting the dyno tomorrow morning. I forgot to mention I milled the heads .020 because he said the 7.400 pushrods were otherwise too short. So maybe the little bit more squeeze is helping too.
Old 07-12-2008, 06:17 PM
  #33  
Teching In
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
esams's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The final dyno pull today on a Dynojet 248 was 526 rwhp and 508 rwtq. The first pull was 516rwhp and 495 rwtq . Last night I made 4 passes at the track on street Nitto 555's and ran a best of 12.79 @ 121 with a wheel hopping 2.30 60 foot. So it should have 125 in it now with traction.

Needless to say I am now happy. I almost feel bad for the '08 supercharged Roush Mustang guy who watched while shaking his head, after putting down 410 just before me. Not bad for a 100+ degree day in Arizona. I'll get the graph up as soon as the shop emails it to me.

Here is the dyno vid...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B4cYYIlN1TQ

Last edited by esams; 07-12-2008 at 06:31 PM.
Old 07-12-2008, 06:58 PM
  #34  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (40)
 
veee8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Raleigh,North Carolina
Posts: 1,861
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Now that is looking better. 526 rwhp is nothing to sneeze at. Good job.
Old 07-12-2008, 08:02 PM
  #35  
pdd
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (3)
 
pdd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: dudley mass
Posts: 4,156
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Wow-much Better:d
Old 07-13-2008, 09:57 AM
  #36  
LS1 Tech Administrator
iTrader: (14)
 
Patrick G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Victoria, TX
Posts: 8,244
Likes: 0
Received 32 Likes on 28 Posts

Default

526/508 rwhp/rwtq is very good for such a mild combo. I'm glad you're pleased with the combo. Out of curiousity, what kind of timing did your engine want?
__________________

2013 Corvette Grand Sport A6 LME forged 416, Greg Good ported TFS 255 LS3 heads, 222/242 .629"/.604" 121LSA Pat G blower cam, ARH 1 7/8" headers, ESC Novi 1500 Supercharger w/8 rib direct drive conversion, 747rwhp/709rwtq on 93 octane, 801rwhp/735rwtq on race fuel, 10.1 @ 147.25mph 1/4 mile, 174.7mph Half Mile.
2016 Corvette Z51 M7 Magnuson Heartbeat 2300 supercharger, TSP LT headers, Pat G tuned, 667rwhp, 662rwtq, 191mph TX Mile.
2009.5 Pontiac G8 GT 6.0L, A6, AFR 230v2 heads. 506rwhp/442rwtq. 11.413 @ 121.29mph 1/4 mile, 168.7mph TX Mile
2000 Pewter Ram Air Trans Am M6 heads/cam 508 rwhp/445 rwtq SAE, 183.092 TX Mile
2018 Cadillac Escalade 6.2L A10 Pat G tuned.
LS1,LS2,LS3,LS7,LT1 Custom Camshaft Specialist For custom camshaft help press here.
Custom LSX tuning in person or via email press here.
Old 07-13-2008, 10:50 AM
  #37  
Teching In
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
esams's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

It wanted 26 degrees throughout, down to 25 up top. That is on 91 octane.

NicD is the tuner (dude is amazing, everyone here in AZ and all the shops use him for any and all LS stuff). Even he was impressed, said it is in the top 5 or 10 L92 headed setups he has worked with.
Old 07-13-2008, 06:33 PM
  #38  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (25)
 
03 BUSA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Kannapolis, NC
Posts: 2,554
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by esams
232/238/615/607/113+2 . Hitting the dyno tomorrow morning. I forgot to mention I milled the heads .020 because he said the 7.400 pushrods were otherwise too short. So maybe the little bit more squeeze is helping too.
Thanks for that. Great job on the numbers and as always going with Pat G never fails. 230's on the cam is what these packages seem to like. I have not run mine at the track yet but I would think she would run faster than the 12's? Realisticly where do you feel you can get it down to and also what gears are u running? Thanks again.
Old 07-13-2008, 07:34 PM
  #39  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (3)
 
Blue Meanie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 363
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I love happy endings.
Old 07-14-2008, 05:19 AM
  #40  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (2)
 
WKMCD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 3,416
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Great numbers..


Quick Reply: L92/L76 427 results and questions (*edit, big gains later)



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:49 AM.