Generation IV Internal Engine 2005-2014 LS2 | LS3 | LS7 | L92 | LS9

Stock Motor 1 3/4" Vs. 1 7/8 Engine Dyno Results!!

Old 09-04-2008, 08:58 PM
  #1  
LS1Tech Premium Sponsor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
Jason 98 TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Texas!
Posts: 4,229
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default Stock Motor 1 3/4" Vs. 1 7/8 Engine Dyno Results!!

After 5 days of engine dyno testing different combinations & packages I'm proud to announce I finally have some extra time to provide you guys with some of the information we've learned!


The very first dyno testing we did compared header primaries & power output from 3000 to 6000rpm. The base engine was completely stock 01 engine with only a Fast intake installed. We dyno tested both the Pacesetter 1 3/4" coated long tubes & the TSP 1 7/8" long tube headers. The goal was to see how the larger primaries would effect power on a basically stock engine. To my suprise the 1 7/8" headers made a considerable amount more power than the 1 3/4" headers! Power output was virtually identical untiL 4800 rpm when the 1 7/8" headers began to outpower the smaller 1 3/4" primaries. The 1 7/8" headers made a peak hp of 414.x hp & 421lb ft while the 1 3/4" headers made 408hp & 419 lb ft of torque. While this isn't a huge difference, it definately shows that even on a basically stock car the larger headers are still a good investment! Power under the 4800rpm point was virtually identical! Infact the 3000 rpm numbers were 209hp 366 tq from the 1 3/4" headers & 209hp 359.9 tq!

Both dyno runs were backed up several times & the combos used very similar air fuels & locked in timing at 28 degrees. I thought this was a pretty cool comparision, because the common thought is the 1 7/8" headers is just overkill on anything smaller than stroker setups. This is apparently not the case....

Here's a few pics of the 1 7/8" headers installed on the engine dyno



The dyno video can be seen at:

http://www.precisionracecomponents.com/178dyno.mpg

I'll have some of the guys help me bust out some detailed dyno graphs for you guys to checkout in the morning.

Enjoy!!

I would like to offer anyone who doesn't agree with these finding to come down to our shop & I will be more than happy to redo any testing we've done over the last 5 days. All our engine dyno testing was done at a independent dyno facility & as long as your willing to pay the dyno testing fees, I'll glady reproduce any testing we've done. This is a very reasonable offer, if you don't want to put your money where your mouth is then please don't jump in this thread & talk crap. I'll gladly defend any testing we've done, I'm always looking for a opportunity to get back to the engine dyno for more testing.
__________________
Jason
Co-Owner, Texas Speed & Performance, Ltd.
2005 Twin Turbo C6
404cid Stroker, 67mm Twins
994rwhp/902lb ft @ 22 psi (mustang dyno) www.Texas-Speed.com
Old 09-04-2008, 09:07 PM
  #2  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (15)
 
DrkPhx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: St. Michael, MN.
Posts: 4,519
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Good results. It would be nice to that test on a stroker spun up to 7000 rpms to compare the results.
Old 09-04-2008, 09:07 PM
  #3  
Staging Lane
iTrader: (26)
 
NMJ87T2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Sunshine State
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

From your picture i see that you are running truck coils. Is this something that you recomend?

I am torn about weather to run 1-3/4 or 1-7/8 headers. Do you have any tests from idle to 6k? To see if the bottom end suffers from the larger primaries.

Thanks
Nolan
Old 09-04-2008, 09:15 PM
  #4  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (15)
 
DrkPhx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: St. Michael, MN.
Posts: 4,519
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Jason 98 TA
Power under the 4800rpm point was virtually identical! Infact the 3000 rpm numbers were 209hp 366 tq from the 1 3/4" headers & 209hp 359.9 tq!
He said it was identical under 4800 rpms, which sounds like no loss of power down low.
Old 09-04-2008, 09:20 PM
  #5  
Staging Lane
iTrader: (26)
 
NMJ87T2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Sunshine State
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by DrkPhx
He said it was identical under 4800 rpms, which sounds like no loss of power down low.

Yes, I saw that , but he also said that the test was from 3k to 6k. I am not going to assume that this includes from idle. I am a stickler for detais.

Nolan
Old 09-05-2008, 02:12 AM
  #6  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
Summerwolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,060
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

what rpms do you race at? Idle....When you race are you above 3k? Yes....sounds like a win/win from almost any standpoint.
Old 09-05-2008, 04:26 AM
  #7  
On The Tree
 
PowerTalk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Over the rainbow
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

This is just what a well known Australian workshop has been recommending for years!
1 7/8"s make more power on everything from stock LS1 engines and right through to massive H/C combos

So now here's more proof
Old 09-05-2008, 09:00 AM
  #8  
LS1Tech Premium Sponsor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
Jason 98 TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Texas!
Posts: 4,229
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Sorry guys you just can't put load on the enigne dyno much bellow 3000 rpm. The engine dyno operator tried to talk me out of going 3000rpm!
__________________
Jason
Co-Owner, Texas Speed & Performance, Ltd.
2005 Twin Turbo C6
404cid Stroker, 67mm Twins
994rwhp/902lb ft @ 22 psi (mustang dyno) www.Texas-Speed.com
Old 09-05-2008, 09:09 AM
  #9  
Moderator
iTrader: (15)
 
JayplaySS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Miami, OH
Posts: 4,616
Received 161 Likes on 99 Posts

Default

1 7/8's - dumdumdum as Ive always said. Thanks TSP!

Now test them on a larger cube LS2/LS3/LS7 and they will shine even more.
Old 09-05-2008, 09:24 AM
  #10  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
ShoddyHog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Festus, MO
Posts: 311
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Yeah, but you'll loose so much "power under the curve", when you put it in drive, you'll strart rolling in reverse. lol

My LS2 seems to like my 1 7/8 Kooks.

Gerry
Old 09-05-2008, 10:45 AM
  #11  
Teching In
iTrader: (2)
 
psrumors's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Not disputing the facts and very good test but couldn't collector design differences make up the 6 hp and 3ftlb?

Why not use a set of Kooks or other manufacturer that has both sizes to make the comparison?
Old 09-05-2008, 10:58 AM
  #12  
LS1Tech Premium Sponsor
iTrader: (5)
 
Sales2@Texas-speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Texas!
Posts: 5,053
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

We wanted to test the two most popular headers WE sell to give actual data to OUR customers. But, we also tested Kooks 1 7/8" stepped headers as well.
__________________


Largest Stocking Distributor of LS-x Engines / CHECK OUT OUR NEW WEBSITE!

COMP - FAST - PACESETTER - DIAMOND RACING - EAGLE SPECIALTY PRODUCTS - CALLIES - COMETIC GASKETS
RAM CLUTCHES - MOSER ENGINEERING - KOOK'S HEADERS - ARP - GM BOLTS AND GASKETS - MSD - NGK
POWERBOND - ASP - AND MORE!
Old 09-05-2008, 11:00 AM
  #13  
Teching In
iTrader: (2)
 
psrumors's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Matt@Texas-Speed
We wanted to test the two most popular headers WE sell to give actual data to OUR customers. But, we also tested Kooks 1 7/8" stepped headers as well.
makes perfect sense and very good test none the less.

It is great to see sellers go the extra mile to inform their customers.
Old 09-05-2008, 07:28 PM
  #14  
Teching In
 
Beach Goatxz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Virginia Beach
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Good test, thanks.
Old 09-05-2008, 09:13 PM
  #15  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (23)
 
tektrans's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,377
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

When I had my old 408 I went from 1 3/4 to 1 7/8 and gained zero.
Zero on the dyno and Zero at the track. FWIW
Old 09-06-2008, 04:30 AM
  #16  
FormerVendor
 
racer7088's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Houston, Tx.
Posts: 3,065
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Thumbs up

Originally Posted by Jason 98 TA
I would like to offer anyone who doesn't agree with these finding to come down to our shop & I will be more than happy to redo any testing we've done over the last 5 days. All our engine dyno testing was done at a independent dyno facility & as long as your willing to pay the dyno testing fees, I'll glady reproduce any testing we've done. This is a very reasonable offer, if you don't want to put your money where your mouth is then please don't jump in this thread & talk crap. I'll gladly defend any testing we've done, I'm always looking for a opportunity to get back to the engine dyno for more testing.
Jason, I have seen many many tests almost identical and we always see the 1 7/8ths make better power too. On the bigger stuff of course it's even a slightly larger gain.
Old 09-06-2008, 05:27 AM
  #17  
TECH Fanatic
 
ringram's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Sunny London, UK
Posts: 1,690
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by tektrans
When I had my old 408 I went from 1 3/4 to 1 7/8 and gained zero.
Zero on the dyno and Zero at the track. FWIW
Open headers? Or did you have an exhaust system behind them? Did you retune fueling/spark to take advantage of the extra airflow?
Old 09-06-2008, 06:52 AM
  #18  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (20)
 
JoeyD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Avoca, PA
Posts: 167
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by racer7088
Jason, I have seen many many tests almost identical and we always see the 1 7/8ths make better power too. On the bigger stuff of course it's even a slightly larger gain.
That's good. Can't wait to bolt my ARH 1 7/8th set to my new set up.
Old 09-06-2008, 07:27 AM
  #19  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (98)
 
99ssleeper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 2,036
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post

Default

Good info, thank you!

But I still want to see a dyno test from idle...hahaha
Old 09-06-2008, 07:58 AM
  #20  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (23)
 
tektrans's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,377
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ringram
Open headers? Or did you have an exhaust system behind them? Did you retune fueling/spark to take advantage of the extra airflow?
I had an x pipe and true duals dumped before the axle.
Was checked on the dyno, no changes had to be made.
All set ups are different, like I said-FWIW.

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Stock Motor 1 3/4" Vs. 1 7/8 Engine Dyno Results!!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:38 AM.