Generation V Internal Engine 2013-20xx LT1

Direct Injection = Carbon Buildup?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-18-2013, 08:54 PM
  #81  
BMW ///M Nerd
iTrader: (5)
 
BAD ASS TA WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: NH
Posts: 4,112
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

If you think rocking a car back and forth as described in the thread above is common/smart practice you are being primitive. There is no reason one would rock the driveline of a car in FIRST gear forward/backward on any of these big dollar engines.

Breaker bar in one direction, well yeah duh. The above thread was referring to the crank being hard to get to, so rocking it back and forth in first is the best solution. Haha, not the same as bumping a starter pal.

I would like to see someone do that on a Valvetronic motor on one of these forums without the valves at min. lift. I'm sure theres already a thread for that too LOL

I agree not many people will want to be running meth on an N/A V8. We just got a couple new GMCs in. I havent seen one in the shop yet so I still haven't seen how they set the PCV up.
Old 07-19-2013, 07:20 AM
  #82  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (10)
 
disc0monkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: 5.0
Posts: 1,302
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Another thing not being considered is how the meth system is setup. Maybe those who havent had good results have it set to turn on at wot only and need to refill there tank once a month.

The meth ingredients arent that cheap anymore and it wouldnt be hard to believe those experts on the bmw forums you referenced might be cheap on the spray.

It was pretty common we were hosing the motor down to the point we needed refill meth twice a tank. including lots of mexico high speed rallys. that could be the difference youre looking for.
Old 07-19-2013, 09:26 PM
  #83  
TECH Apprentice
 
Krom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 328
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Krom

Why don't you explain how it is any different to turn the engine by the flywheel with a starter, than by the flywheel with the trans???


While your at it, you can add what being an interference engine makes a difference. The starter wont save a valve from being bent, hell most starters have enough *** to bend a rod if there is too much fluid in the chamber

by that logic, pop starting a car would destroy the engine...

The engine doesn't know the difference, it only knows its being turned...
Originally Posted by BAD *** TA WS6

Haha, not the same as bumping a starter pal.
Nice dodge/fail.....
Old 07-23-2013, 12:37 PM
  #84  
On The Tree
 
T.Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Desert
Posts: 124
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Krom
FWIW IMHO when you are doing valves, its easier to bump the car back and forth, or use a breaker bar to turn the engine, as you can always stop the crank exactly where you want it.

Why don't you explain how it is any different to turn the engine by the flywheel with a starter, than by the flywheel with the trans???

While your at it, you can add what being an interference engine makes a difference. The starter wont save a valve from being bent, hell most starters have enough *** to bend a rod if there is too much fluid in the chamber

by that logic, pop starting a car would destroy the engine...

The engine doesn't know the difference, it only knows its being turned..
I feel/felt the same way and have a similar opinion as yours. However, I didn't feel the need to continue the discussion/argument.

Theres more than one way to skin a cat in this instance
Old 07-23-2013, 12:42 PM
  #85  
On The Tree
 
T.Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Desert
Posts: 124
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by disc0monkey
Another thing not being considered is how the meth system is setup. Maybe those who havent had good results have it set to turn on at wot only and need to refill there tank once a month.

The meth ingredients arent that cheap anymore and it wouldnt be hard to believe those experts on the bmw forums you referenced might be cheap on the spray.

It was pretty common we were hosing the motor down to the point we needed refill meth twice a tank. including lots of mexico high speed rallys. that could be the difference youre looking for.
This is a good possibility. However, running around and spraying meth as an additional fuel source outside of any real demand wouldn't be a good idea IMHO.
Old 07-24-2013, 02:32 PM
  #86  
On The Tree
 
427 zeo6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I'll put my 2cents in on this subject as a reformed Audi B7 RS4 owner I'm more than familiar with intake valve build up on direct injected gasoline fueled engines. Making a motor work is a study in physics, electronics, and CHEMISTRY! I say there is a MASSIVE FAIL on the part of Direct Injected gasoline fueled motors. The build up isn't only oil from PCV system but also tars, and parrafins from the fuel being injected into the cylinder. The fuel air mixture in most high performance motors will have a tendency to reverse flow at certain RPM levels, that tendency has to do with lots of aspects but, in a high performance motor with lots of intake to exhaust overlap on cam timing (much less overlap in the C7 than in an RS4) reversion is always present during some period of motor operation (in old Detroit muscle the reversion most evident at idle the "lopey cam" sound.) During this time of reversion, the fuel mix hits the backside of an intake valve which is no longer being cooled by a fuel mixture crossing its backside while entering the combustion chamber. This hotter valve causes the mixture to boil and leave heavy deposits of tar/paraffin that are present in even the best "Top Tier" fuels. This build up will be present on all DI motors, the VW 2.0 4 cylinder, the DI Lexus motors, Mercedes, Audis, the GM 3.6 V6, even Porsche DI motors are showing problems. If you don't want build up run your C7 on E85 and enjoy the 18MPG fuel mileage.

No easy solution to this one!
Old 07-25-2013, 03:05 PM
  #87  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (1)
 
Vertigo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Winchester,VA
Posts: 773
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I can confirm this is an issue for us N54 guys. I have walnut blasted 4 N54 cars now including my own 2x in the past 60k. Every 20-30k the idle will get pretty rough and the DME will kick in a bump the idle rpms from 650 to 900rpm to smooth it out. It take about 3 hours start to finish. The only items that have to come off the car are the intakes filters and the intake manifold. From that point on its just TDC the piston and blast away then vacuum the debris out. Runs like butter afterwards.
Old 07-25-2013, 05:08 PM
  #88  
Teching In
 
arghx7's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 427 zeo6
I'll put my 2cents in on this subject as a reformed Audi B7 RS4 owner I'm more than familiar with intake valve build up on direct injected gasoline fueled engines. Making a motor work is a study in physics, electronics, and CHEMISTRY! I say there is a MASSIVE FAIL on the part of Direct Injected gasoline fueled motors. The build up isn't only oil from PCV system but also tars, and parrafins from the fuel being injected into the cylinder. The fuel air mixture in most high performance motors will have a tendency to reverse flow at certain RPM levels, that tendency has to do with lots of aspects but, in a high performance motor with lots of intake to exhaust overlap on cam timing (much less overlap in the C7 than in an RS4) reversion is always present during some period of motor operation (in old Detroit muscle the reversion most evident at idle the "lopey cam" sound.) During this time of reversion, the fuel mix hits the backside of an intake valve which is no longer being cooled by a fuel mixture crossing its backside while entering the combustion chamber. This hotter valve causes the mixture to boil and leave heavy deposits of tar/paraffin that are present in even the best "Top Tier" fuels. This build up will be present on all DI motors, the VW 2.0 4 cylinder, the DI Lexus motors, Mercedes, Audis, the GM 3.6 V6, even Porsche DI motors are showing problems. If you don't want build up run your C7 on E85 and enjoy the 18MPG fuel mileage.

No easy solution to this one!
This is a good point. Even with good air/oil separation in the PCV system, high overlap can cause a lot of buildup. Much of that overlap is used for fuel economy in many parts of the operating range. Phasing the cams independently of each other allows you to dial in more or less overlap.

On the new LT1, the cam phaser does not allow independent adjustment of either the intake or exhaust valves. The overlap is fixed. So that bodes well for keeping intake deposits down.



Quick Reply: Direct Injection = Carbon Buildup?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:01 PM.