LS4 Performance Grand Prix GXP | Monte Carlo SS | Impala SS | LaCrosse Super

Thorley Header Project Update

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 4, 2009 | 12:45 AM
  #181  
JDMC5's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,366
Likes: 0
From: Highland, MI
Default

I see
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2009 | 07:27 AM
  #182  
rarert's Avatar
Teching In
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Default

Hi. I'm new to the forum. I have an '07 Impala SS. I've put a K&N cone filter on. What other 'basic' mods can I do? How loud are the flowmasters? I like the sound of a (hush my mouth) Mustang GT and don't want it too loud as it is a family car. How about engine programming? Any help will be greatly appreciated. I'm a recent Mopar convert and new to Bow Tie. Thanks.
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2009 | 08:41 AM
  #183  
98GTcoupe's Avatar
Launching!
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 223
Likes: 0
From: Bury St Edmunds, England
Default

So, Lets talk warranties with our up an coming head project.

I called my hometown GM dealer and talked with the Service manager. I asked him if putting headers on my car will void the warranty. He said short answer YES.

His long answer was you put headers on it, something breaks, I DONT CARE bring it in ill warranty it. But, I cannot do that seeing that i will be moving to Penacola FL soon, and hes up in North Eastern Ohio in Lake County.

HE also stated that, once you bring your car in for work, and you have headers on it that any dealer will up load your info on the system that the car has been modified. With that you will go to any dealer and they will automatically turn you away because of the data base system those *********** have.

SO, for all you fellas out there looking to get the headers beware. I plan on getting them, and if all else fails, ill take the extra time to swap my manifolds back on then take her in if its something I cant fix.

Greg
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2009 | 09:32 AM
  #184  
DP 08 GXP's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,592
Likes: 0
From: Northwest, OH
Default

hopefully money works out so i can get them but ill just sit on them which is going to suck and have them put on when the warranty is up....i just dont want to have to worry about finding a used set when the time comes.
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2009 | 12:01 PM
  #185  
07SSport's Avatar
Staging Lane
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Default

Since I suck at reading dyno charts, can anyone tell me if there is any indiction of a loss in low end torque after the header install? Being that most of us use our LS4 powered vehicles as a DD, the last thing I want to sacrifice is low end torque.

THanks in advance.
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2009 | 12:43 PM
  #186  
JDMC5's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,366
Likes: 0
From: Highland, MI
Default

Originally Posted by rarert
Hi. I'm new to the forum. I have an '07 Impala SS. I've put a K&N cone filter on. What other 'basic' mods can I do? How loud are the flowmasters? I like the sound of a (hush my mouth) Mustang GT and don't want it too loud as it is a family car. How about engine programming? Any help will be greatly appreciated. I'm a recent Mopar convert and new to Bow Tie. Thanks.
make a post in different thread, introduce yourself and go from there.
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2009 | 12:44 PM
  #187  
neilownz's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 1,769
Likes: 0
From: Fargo, ND
Default

Looks to me like there is a gain. And the LS4 already has trouble hooking up because of too much torque imo.
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2009 | 01:31 PM
  #188  
Sittingmongoose's Avatar
TECH Resident
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 898
Likes: 1
From: Philly
Default

According to the posted dyno sheet, most of the gains were down VERY low in the power band. It will increase your lowend torque and hp. This is unusual results though. The gains shouldnt have been down low they should have been more uptop where the car is more restricted. Dont get me wrong, gains are gains and it will help a lot when we shift but still its weird.
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2009 | 01:34 PM
  #189  
BuickRacer's Avatar
Thread Starter
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
From: Orange County, CA
Default

I had a nice “wrap up” chat with Nick on the phone today…

According to Nick, when their R&D guys were running my car on the dyno after the header install, they were shocked that the car WASN’T making more power than they anticipated. It wasn’t until I had texted Nick with some information about our LS4 cams that they realized what the problem was, and the headers just “amplify” (so to speak) how choked up these motors are with the OEM DOD cam installed in them. I mentioned to Nick that one “hot ticket” might be to go with an LS6 cam which would still be fairly mild mannered yet pass smog and all that, and he agreed that a higher lift cam would do WONDERS with headers (“Dude, you should do it!”)

LS6 Cam Specs (example)
Cam duration: 204 intake / 211 exhaust
Cam Lift: 0.525 intake / 0.525 exhaust
Cam Part No.: 12565308
Type: Hydraulic roller

I can't post the pictures I have of the prototypes that were installed on my car; can William or someone help me out?

Last edited by BuickRacer; Dec 4, 2009 at 03:11 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2009 | 01:37 PM
  #190  
Sittingmongoose's Avatar
TECH Resident
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 898
Likes: 1
From: Philly
Default

LOL so i have the ls6 cam and should see much higher gains????
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2009 | 01:54 PM
  #191  
williamGT's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,467
Likes: 0
From: Yellowknife NT Canada
Default

Heres the pics of them off:



Last edited by williamGT; Dec 4, 2009 at 02:19 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2009 | 02:01 PM
  #192  
LS4SPEED's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 633
Likes: 1
Default

Damn those look nice!
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2009 | 02:11 PM
  #193  
tokay57's Avatar
On The Tree
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
Default

it will probably be a good idea to wrap the tube that snakes over the engine compartment to limit the excessive heat soak we already have. is welding an absolute or can it be clamped via slip on tubes? one more question, why is a hoist needed? Thanks
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2009 | 02:22 PM
  #194  
williamGT's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,467
Likes: 0
From: Yellowknife NT Canada
Default

Originally Posted by tokay57
it will probably be a good idea to wrap the tube that snakes over the engine compartment to limit the excessive heat soak we already have. is welding an absolute or can it be clamped via slip on tubes? one more question, why is a hoist needed? Thanks
they might have to be welded, I don't think you can fit a clamp there.
Its quicker to install if you have a hoist (4hours) maybe longer without one.
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2009 | 02:30 PM
  #195  
JDMC5's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,366
Likes: 0
From: Highland, MI
Default

Originally Posted by BuickRacer
I had a nice “wrap up” chat with Nick on the phone today…

According to Nick, when their R&D guys were running my car on the dyno after the header install, they were shocked that the car WASN’T making more power than they anticipated. It wasn’t until I had texted Nick with some information about our LS4 cams that they realized what the problem was, and the headers just “amplify” (so to speak) how choked up these motors are with the OEM DOD cam installed them. I mentioned to Nick that one “hot ticket” might be to go with an LS6 cam which would still be fairly mild mannered yet pass smog and all that, and he agreed that a higher lift cam would do WONDERS with headers (“Dude, you should do it!”)

LS6 Cam Specs (example)
Cam duration: 204 intake / 211 exhaust
Cam Lift: 0.525 intake / 0.525 exhaust
Cam Part No.: 12565308
Type: Hydraulic roller

I can't post the pictures I have of the prototypes that were installed on my car; can William or someone help me out?
You should do some research on the Lingenfelter GT2-3 cam, it's better than the LS6 cam and still idles stock.
duration @ .050 207/220
lift w/1.7 rocker .571/.578
Lobe separation 118.5
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2009 | 03:06 PM
  #196  
Sittingmongoose's Avatar
TECH Resident
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 898
Likes: 1
From: Philly
Default

Ya if i could do my cam swap again, i would def do a LOT more aggresive cam
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2009 | 03:14 PM
  #197  
BuickRacer's Avatar
Thread Starter
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
From: Orange County, CA
Default

Originally Posted by Sittingmongoose
Ya if i could do my cam swap again, i would def do a LOT more aggresive cam
Mongoose, since you probably have an LS4 cam laying on a workbench somewhere, can you take it to a shop and have them check it with a Cam Doctor? I'm sure a lot of us would like to get a definitive word on the cam specs as GOOGLE seems to pull up every LSx motor EXCEPT the LS4.

Last edited by BuickRacer; Dec 4, 2009 at 03:21 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2009 | 03:19 PM
  #198  
BuickRacer's Avatar
Thread Starter
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
From: Orange County, CA
Default

Originally Posted by tokay57
One more question, why is a hoist needed? Thanks
To get the back manifold off and put the new one on...?
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2009 | 03:52 PM
  #199  
Nacho SS's Avatar
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,560
Likes: 0
From: 805-818
Default

Any video yet? I wanna hear the difference in sound, if there is one. Hopefully its more of a traditional LSx sound instead of the farm truck sound they gave the LS4.
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2009 | 04:50 PM
  #200  
LS4SPEED's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 633
Likes: 1
Default

Damn, where have you been hiding? I havent seen you post in a long time.

Originally Posted by Nacho SS
Any video yet? I wanna hear the difference in sound, if there is one. Hopefully its more of a traditional LSx sound instead of the farm truck sound they gave the LS4.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:30 PM.