LS4 Performance Grand Prix GXP | Monte Carlo SS | Impala SS | LaCrosse Super

Test Drove Camaro SS

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-03-2010, 11:08 AM
  #1  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
 
SSCoop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Sicklerville, NJ
Posts: 646
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Test Drove Camaro SS

Went to the dealership just to browse around and see what they had in stock and i was staring at a 04 Dodge Viper SRT-10 with 1000 miles on it. Salesman comes up to me and starts talking to me about it, then he asked me if i was interested in the Camaro SS. I say not really and then he asks me if i want to test drive it so i accepted. Got in and im only 5 ft 8 inches and it felt like being stuffed in a sardine can. Not to mention the blind spots in the car. Started it up and it had a quiet rumble to it. Took it to the track out back and was not impressed by the overall drive. The ride was indeed smooth but it didnt have that thrust that my impala has (probably because im straight piped) but it will get me on higher speeds. Idk if it was just that particular car but i just was not impressed by it. Not to mention the car was just heavy as hell. I thought 400 horses would push better than that
Old 08-03-2010, 12:25 PM
  #2  
TECH Enthusiast
 
Bryan921SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Zeeland, MI
Posts: 621
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Cool story bro!!!



Your car feels quicker due to the torque converter...not straight pipes....thought you wanted a charger...
Old 08-03-2010, 01:09 PM
  #3  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
 
SSCoop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Sicklerville, NJ
Posts: 646
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

yea i did..i just wanted to drive the camaro because i had nothing else better to do and because he offered..The charger felt alittle faster than the camaro as well idk maybe its just me but for some reason i just cant let my impala go
Old 08-03-2010, 02:52 PM
  #4  
TECH Apprentice
 
Z28 Autobot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 360
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

haha..what one did you play with the auto or the manual..there is a slight diff. to the two cars.

but side by side if you were to race a new SS we all would get smoked..
Old 08-03-2010, 03:04 PM
  #5  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
 
SSCoop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Sicklerville, NJ
Posts: 646
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Z28 Autobot
haha..what one did you play with the auto or the manual..there is a slight diff. to the two cars.

but side by side if you were to race a new SS we all would get smoked..

believe me i know..it just didnt have that pull like my impala did. idk...but it was the auto i drove
Old 08-03-2010, 03:25 PM
  #6  
TECH Enthusiast
 
Count of Monte Carlo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Hudson River Valley, NY
Posts: 697
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Don't feel so bad I am kinda on the fence myself with that car also. I think I like a '94 better. I would say '93 but the gauges are **** yellow.

Its fast no doubt but its alittle weird...and I am 6'0 280 broad shouldered... it wasn't easy either.
Old 08-03-2010, 03:37 PM
  #7  
TECH Fanatic
 
Kazmaniac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,190
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

From the front and sides the car is amazing but they need to fix that rear end and 60's dash before I'd consider one.
Old 08-03-2010, 04:03 PM
  #8  
TECH Enthusiast
 
Count of Monte Carlo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Hudson River Valley, NY
Posts: 697
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I'll be driving the Black Whale for a long time. Everything is either too expensive or just a pain in the ***.
Old 08-03-2010, 04:21 PM
  #9  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (15)
 
LS1 Racing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: 78°14′46″N 15°27′56″E
Posts: 2,419
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

LS motors take some time break in. They don't really start to run "right" until they hit about 20,000. All 5 LS-powered cars I've had were like this.

Anyway, auto or manual, we all would get owned by ANY 2010 Camaro SS unless we had a power-adder of some sort.
Old 08-03-2010, 05:47 PM
  #10  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (4)
 
Nacho SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: 805-818
Posts: 3,561
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I've driven two new '10SS cars, one auto, the other a manual. The auto felt sluggish but you could tell the power was there. The manual LS3 car had some awesome power but the same complaints remain about the overall make up of the car:

1. It's too heavy.

When I stomp on the Monte, the converter flashes and we're off and running. In the Camaro, it felt like there's plenty of horsepower on tap but the car is held back, neutered if you will, by its poundage.

2. Overall visibility.

I have never really had trouble with visibility in my car, but the short rollup glass, the tiny rearview mirror, the large rear pillars really make me feel like I am driving in a pit that I can't see out of at all. Not to mention the football-field long hood that is at eye level when driving. The driving position takes some time to get used to.
Old 08-03-2010, 06:19 PM
  #11  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (5)
 
94ss06gxp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Mid MI
Posts: 2,351
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

throw in a tune, full exhaust, and intake and i bet you guys wont complain about power lol
Old 08-03-2010, 08:18 PM
  #12  
TECH Apprentice
 
Z28 Autobot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 360
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

ever race an LT1 vs and LS1 camaro?? I did. I got the LS1 off the line all the time. The thing is the LS1 makes it power up top and its reels cars in. WHere the LT1's power is gone top end..

Kinda like our cars..kinda an inigma for an LS engine.
Old 08-03-2010, 08:32 PM
  #13  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (1)
 
Mels SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: New Orleans La
Posts: 3,159
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

There a nice looking car but I love the Monte
Old 08-03-2010, 08:52 PM
  #14  
On The Tree
 
SidewaysV8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Come on, are you guys serious? The car weighs a little over 200 lbs more than an LS4 powered W-body.
Old 08-03-2010, 08:59 PM
  #15  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (8)
 
deelong4002's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Stockbridge, MI
Posts: 724
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Well if the camaro is limited by its "poundage" your IMP is limited by GM's lack of vision in making it FWD. I owned a 2000 SS monte. Great car, looked awesome, torque steered like a ****. I can only imagine how much worse it would be with an LSx motor connected to the transaxle.

Sorry bro, but new the Camaro SS would romp your Impala Manual or Auto, Roll or Dig.

Last edited by deelong4002; 08-03-2010 at 09:11 PM.
Old 08-03-2010, 09:06 PM
  #16  
On The Tree
 
SidewaysV8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by deelong4002
Well if the camaro is limited by its "poundage" your IMP is limited by GM's lack of vision in making it FWD. I owned a 2000 SS monte. Great car, looked awesome, torque steered like a ****. I can only imagine how much worse it would be with an LSx motor connected to the transaxle.

Sorry bro, but new Camaro SS would romp your Impala Manual or Auto, Roll or Dig.
Come on now, you don't have to be mean about it.
Old 08-03-2010, 09:11 PM
  #17  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (8)
 
deelong4002's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Stockbridge, MI
Posts: 724
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by SidewaysV8
Come on now, you don't have to be mean about it.
Nothing mean intended.

Just being honest
Old 08-03-2010, 09:13 PM
  #18  
Banned
 
JP_GXP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Almost Arkansas, LA
Posts: 1,737
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I have very little torque steer. It surprised a friend of mine the first time he drove it he was expecting it get him. The 275s may help.

The Camaro may be faster, but it sure isn't nice to like at...
Old 08-03-2010, 09:37 PM
  #19  
Launching!
iTrader: (4)
 
Aaron_Provost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Waco, TX
Posts: 282
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by deelong4002
Nothing mean intended.

Just being honest
and that same camaro would get its *** handed to it by a lightly modded ls1....how sad

Originally Posted by SidewaysV8
Come on, are you guys serious? The car weighs a little over 200 lbs more than an LS4 powered W-body.
no...only the 4 doors, not the monte
Old 08-03-2010, 10:07 PM
  #20  
Banned
 
JP_GXP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Almost Arkansas, LA
Posts: 1,737
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Monte - 3500
GXP - 3600
Imp - 3700
Camaro - 4000



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:00 PM.