For those who think a small cam is not the way to go. Look!
#21
12 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (14)
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Renton, WA
Posts: 2,563
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
![Devil](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_devil.gif)
Intake valve closing point and exhaust valve opening points taken in consideration. As well as overlap. I don't wanna use headers so keeping the overlap within a certian figure is important.
#22
12 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (14)
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Renton, WA
Posts: 2,563
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
The specs have been posted a couple times. The stock cam has huge advertised duration specs (0.002"); they are in the 340 degree range. The stock cam is also retarded a little bit.
Check out the comp cams lobe catalog. The XE, XE High-Lift and XE-R lobes (page 17 and 18) are used by most speed shops that use Comp as their grinder.
http://www.compcams.com/Technical/Ca...obeCatalog.pdf
Check out the comp cams lobe catalog. The XE, XE High-Lift and XE-R lobes (page 17 and 18) are used by most speed shops that use Comp as their grinder.
http://www.compcams.com/Technical/Ca...obeCatalog.pdf
![Icon Confused](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies2/icon_confused.gif)
#24
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Fredericksburg Va.
Posts: 334
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Been checking out so much crap lately that I can't sleep at night lol..
In fact.. I just spent about 45 mins talking to Roger from VHP. (Great Guy!) I also talked a tech from TPiS.
Choices...choices...choices... ahh.....
Intresting thing though is that both guys told me that the LS6 intake is stronger above 3000 rpm (duh.. right?) They both agreed that the LS1 was a better street intake and that the LS6 isn't all that much stronger till about 5000 and up. (On a built engine) I'll probly slap one on though just for the sake of having one. So.. it looks like I'll be tearing her back apart again but I'm keeping my stock exhaust manifolds. Nitrious too!
Three different cam choices to choose from. ennie.. minne... minnie.. moe..
In fact.. I just spent about 45 mins talking to Roger from VHP. (Great Guy!) I also talked a tech from TPiS.
Choices...choices...choices... ahh.....
Intresting thing though is that both guys told me that the LS6 intake is stronger above 3000 rpm (duh.. right?) They both agreed that the LS1 was a better street intake and that the LS6 isn't all that much stronger till about 5000 and up. (On a built engine) I'll probly slap one on though just for the sake of having one. So.. it looks like I'll be tearing her back apart again but I'm keeping my stock exhaust manifolds. Nitrious too!
Three different cam choices to choose from. ennie.. minne... minnie.. moe..
#25
12 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (14)
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Renton, WA
Posts: 2,563
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Get it done man..... Ive been looking into your cam even more but im still leaning towards the 210/218 with 1.8's. Seems like the 056 peaks at about 5800-5900 in a 5.7 great torque curve from the graphs i have studied. Headers with 3.29/3.69's would make our cars a blast to drive!
#26
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Fredericksburg Va.
Posts: 334
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Get it done man..... Ive been looking into your cam even more but im still leaning towards the 210/218 with 1.8's. Seems like the 056 peaks at about 5800-5900 in a 5.7 great torque curve from the graphs i have studied. Headers with 3.29/3.69's would make our cars a blast to drive!
#27
TECH Regular
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Farmington Hills, MI
Posts: 446
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by GXP25
Wow, and here I thought I could add VVT thinking it was straight forward (reluctor change for me and VVT parts). But damn this *** backwards engine, lol.
I've seen the advertised specs, which are in the service manuals, quoted by a couple GM techs on this site. I believe that's around 0.002" or lower. Two different measurements show the 0.006" lift in the 310-320 range. It's not symmetric at low lift; there is a lot of low lift overlap. I suspect that is related to us not having an external EGR system.
The good news is that I do have headers and 3.29s and the car is alot of fun to drive. But I have to confess, after driving around now for a few months I sometimes question my cam choice, could I have gone alittle more aggressive? Am I getting all I can out of this engine? I hope that a good dynotune and the N20 will quiet that little voice in my head.
#28
Staging Lane
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: WILKES-BARRE,PA.
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
nmpoo98- i liked your posts on [cams].. thanks for all that information ! i think a lot more torque will blow up, our great trannys/quickly ?..i also think a top end cam ,higher rpm's might be slower than stock at the drags ? rkvette