Cooler thermostat
Also, if you did go ahead and do this, you'd need to get a tune that lowers the fan turn-on temp. Otherwise, it's a complete waste of time.
Edit: The above info applies to near-stock or bolt-on car. Obviously, 2005gxp's car is a bit more modified, and I'm sure he benefits from a 160 t-stat due to his turbo and stuff.
Since it's highly unlikely you'll find anyone who has done a dyno pull or track run with the only change being the thermostat, it's all going to be circumstantial anecdotes as to what's better for stock or better with a cam change or tune.
You go with the highest temp before predetonation is a very good rule though. Engines are little more than heat pumps and any heat lost into the block is heat not doing any work. Cooler thermostats increase this heat loss, but the idea being it might allow for denser air/fuel mixtures without detonation.
Personally, I've never seen my engine temps dip back under 187 and cause the thermostat to close, and I'm a bit farther North than you are. If that is also the case with your engine, then you would see no benefit from switching to a 160.
Trending Topics
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
Since it's highly unlikely you'll find anyone who has done a dyno pull or track run with the only change being the thermostat, it's all going to be circumstantial anecdotes as to what's better for stock or better with a cam change or tune.
You go with the highest temp before predetonation is a very good rule though. Engines are little more than heat pumps and any heat lost into the block is heat not doing any work. Cooler thermostats increase this heat loss, but the idea being it might allow for denser air/fuel mixtures without detonation.




