LS4 Performance Grand Prix GXP | Monte Carlo SS | Impala SS | LaCrosse Super

2006 Monte Carlos

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-30-2005, 03:43 PM
  #1  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
NC98Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,306
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question 2006 Monte Carlos

I see the 2006 Monte Carlos have a 5.3 along with their smaller Impala SS's.
How do these run compared to the 98 thru 2002 Camaro's? I know they are front wheel drive and wonder if my 98's 10 bolt would hold up longer that the new Chevy models or are they going to be stronger than I want to give the credit for.
Old 11-30-2005, 04:05 PM
  #2  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (2)
 
Hoss Ghoul's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: East Bay, Ca
Posts: 679
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I don't quite understand your question?

Are you asking how the drivetrain will hold up in the Impala's and the Monte Carlo's? Or how your car would hold up with a 5.3L engine?

The Impalas/Monte Carlos don't have 10 bolts, they have front mounted transaxles and independent rear suspensions. Don't know the details.
Old 11-30-2005, 04:23 PM
  #3  
Tech Resident
iTrader: (5)
 
WhiteKnightZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: CT
Posts: 1,403
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

forget the chevys, go with the new Grand Prix GXP... its the same car but it has wider tires on the front so it doesnt understeer like all hell. (or at least it understreers LESS than the chevys... who cares its ******* FWD)
Old 11-30-2005, 07:35 PM
  #4  
Shirley Temple Drinker
iTrader: (1)
 
Sgt. Spuds's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: IL
Posts: 3,333
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Good family/winter car, other than that, idk.
Old 11-30-2005, 08:40 PM
  #5  
Teching In
iTrader: (1)
 
Joe K. 99 Zeee!!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: NOVA
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I'm sure the new Monte SS would give an LT1 a run for the money. I believe any LS1 would beat it in a straight line. From the reviews it looks like they've done a good job of eliminating torque steer, but in a road course, an F-body would be all over it. It's designed as a powerful coupe, not a sports car.
Old 11-30-2005, 09:00 PM
  #6  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
 
spy2520's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Waldorf, MD
Posts: 3,513
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

i dont know if you guys have been paying attention, but someone just got a GXP to hit 13.6 @ 102 in the 1/4, i'd say that is in ls1 territory, i believe the GXP is the middleweight of the three as well, the monte being the lightest. check down in the ls4 forum and you'll see https://ls1tech.com/forums/ls4-performance-108/ , those cars are pretty damn fast.
Old 11-30-2005, 11:25 PM
  #7  
Staging Lane
 
LS4 GXP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The GXP has a different suspension and brakes than the Monte and Impala also, along with the wider front tires. The GXP has Bilstein struts, a bigger rear sway bar, 12.7"/12" fr/rr drilled brake rotors, and upgraded two piston calipers in the front. I've driven my brothers stock 97 T/A and raced against him, and the two are pretty even in acceleration and handling. The only difference is that his car oversteers, and mine doesn't. With the wider front tires, under most conditions the rears break loose the same time as the fronts.
The T/A has a different personality though, and both cars are equally great in their own ways.
Old 12-01-2005, 10:09 AM
  #8  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
NC98Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,306
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 2006 Impalas and Monte Carlos

Originally Posted by Hoss Ghoul
I don't quite understand your question?

Are you asking how the drivetrain will hold up in the Impala's and the Monte Carlo's? Or how your car would hold up with a 5.3L engine?

The Impalas/Monte Carlos don't have 10 bolts, they have front mounted transaxles and independent rear suspensions. Don't know the details.
I have a 98 Z28 with a 10 bolt rearend which I consider to be the weakest link in the Z28. Now they are putting 5.3's in front wheel drives and I am curious about how strong are these drivetrains are. Will the front wheel drives hold up or will they make anyone serious about making more power back off because of the whimpy drivetrain won't take it? I would not modify my Z28 anymore because of all the horror stories in here about how weak the 10 bolt rearends are or waste money on rebuilding one. I would take the 12 bolt cure first. So if I took a 2006 chevy Impala and put it on a Dragstrip beside a 98 thru 02 Camaro which one would have drivetrain failure first? I don't have to ask which one would win because the Fbody would kick ***.
Old 12-01-2005, 06:53 PM
  #9  
Staging Lane
iTrader: (1)
 
Dales396lt4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: NE Columbia SC
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Both are good cars, But only time will tell for the FWD cars as for the 10 bolt? I have put many in to the low 11's and they did not brake... I know they do brake but they will take alot...
Old 12-04-2005, 12:23 AM
  #10  
11 Second Club
 
TonyGXP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: NY
Posts: 606
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

One thing to note about the Monte/Impala SS's (only 40lb difference between Monte/GXP, Impala is over a hundred), they don't have the TapShift option, when I ran the 1/4 (18x so far) I had to use it because the damn 2.93 axle, redlines 2nd at 100mph, as you can see I went over that, If I had to slip the shifter up into 3rd, it wouldn't shift on point, slight delay, They designed the TapShift to be the quickest shifting "ManuMatic" around, and trust me it's almost like a DSG gearbox, go drive one, and they get faster, much faster when they start to breakin around 1800-2k.. and my 60's were off that night by a full tenth, been runnin 2.02's on that run it was 2.095, car will be 13.4-13.5's by Feb, no mods, all technique, still learning FWD launch (pretty hard but I'm getting used to it, Factory tires ain't helping)

Originally Posted by spy2520
i dont know if you guys have been paying attention, but someone just got a GXP to hit 13.6 @ 102 in the 1/4, i'd say that is in ls1 territory, i believe the GXP is the middleweight of the three as well, the monte being the lightest. check down in the ls4 forum and you'll see https://ls1tech.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=108 , those cars are pretty damn fast.
Old 12-04-2005, 07:57 AM
  #11  
Staging Lane
iTrader: (1)
 
Dales396lt4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: NE Columbia SC
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I thank you are on track With a mid to low 13's for these cars, 2 tenth in the 60" can be 4 tenth in the 1/4, as for the mph mid to low 13's. The impala's low 14's to high 13's is it. We still need to learn FWD launch
Old 12-04-2005, 09:16 AM
  #12  
11 Second Club
 
TonyGXP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: NY
Posts: 606
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

I take back the no "mods" part, w/o a PCM fix, even with the Stock tires, we can't leave hard at all w/o the TMS kickin in, so hopefully a PCM (maybe a shot of da juice!!, then were lookin for a mid 12..)

And if it's N20, Dale will be the one who makes it happen, by phone of course, I just came from Ft Jackson SC, not driving that again!! (no offense Dale, but your beyond my "drive a while to get a good deal on a mod"..lol)




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:07 AM.