LS4 Performance Grand Prix GXP | Monte Carlo SS | Impala SS | LaCrosse Super

LS6 Intake - getting closer

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 14, 2008 | 05:28 PM
  #41  
jarcher's Avatar
Teching In
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
From: Edmonton, Alberta,
Default

Originally Posted by TiredGXP
Jeff, yeah, I'm interested. I still have you number, I'll give you a call sometime within the next week.

alright sounds good
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2008 | 08:46 AM
  #42  
TiredGXP's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 677
Likes: 0
From: Sherwood Park, AB
Default

Another update

Finished the DOD connector, here's a couple of pics with the lifter cover fully assembled:

Hmmm, need to replace the stock bolts with something a bit lower profile, I need to find something like the button top bolts that come with the FAST 90


Here's a bottom view that shows how the DOD connector plugs in:


And just for the hell of it, here's a shot of the bottom of the valley cover that provides a bit of detail of the DOD solenoids:


Reply
Old Mar 15, 2008 | 09:21 AM
  #43  
Taz34SS's Avatar
TECH Resident
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 910
Likes: 1
Default

AWESOME JOB!!!! Keep us updated.
Reply
Old May 31, 2008 | 10:25 PM
  #44  
TiredGXP's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 677
Likes: 0
From: Sherwood Park, AB
Default

Just a bump.

Haven't worked on this or any of my other mods for a few months (boxes of parts are just gathering dust in the garage). I'm about 95% there on the intake, just have to figure out how to hook up the brake booster and MAP since I had to eliminate the fittings on the rear of the LS6 intake in order to clear the power steering resevoir.

Trying to decide if that can be relocated to the top of the intake like on the LS4.

Reply
Old Aug 27, 2008 | 03:33 PM
  #45  
Bryan921SS's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 621
Likes: 1
From: Zeeland, MI
Default

Any new info on how the LS6 intake swap/build is shaping up?
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2008 | 09:07 PM
  #46  
TiredGXP's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 677
Likes: 0
From: Sherwood Park, AB
Default

I'm just about to get back to this project.

Spent some time a week or so ago replacing valve stem seals, valve springs, push rods and installiing 1.8 rocker arms...what a frigging pain in the *** that was on a FWD V8

At any rate, I've got a bit of tweaking to do to my tune, then I'll take it to a dyno for a baseline run.

Valley cover and intake manifold mods/adapter are all done and ready to go, so after the first visit to the dyno I'll do the swap, play with the tune some more and head back to the dyno to see what the difference is.

Work's kind of nuts at this time of year, so realistically there won't be any results to report until late September.

Reply
Old Aug 29, 2008 | 06:27 PM
  #47  
CardinalsRed's Avatar
On The Tree
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
From: Missouri
Default

once you get the intake in and valley cover, list everything you had to do because i want to do the same once the weiand intake comes out.
Reply
Old Sep 28, 2008 | 01:45 PM
  #48  
DavidGXP's Avatar
12 Second Club
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,563
Likes: 0
From: Renton, WA
Default

How about an update???
Reply
Old Sep 28, 2008 | 02:48 PM
  #49  
TiredGXP's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 677
Likes: 0
From: Sherwood Park, AB
Default

Been busy with work - trying to wrap up a couple of out of town audits, so nothing to update yet.

Reply
Old Sep 29, 2008 | 12:26 AM
  #50  
Nacho SS's Avatar
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,560
Likes: 0
From: 805-818
Default

Hurry.....I need this mod.
Reply
Old Sep 29, 2008 | 12:46 AM
  #51  
neilownz's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 1,769
Likes: 0
From: Fargo, ND
Default

Maybe it'll be done by the 1yr anniversary of the thread.
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2008 | 01:22 AM
  #52  
LS4 swap's Avatar
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
Default

Well?
How far did you get?
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2008 | 02:24 AM
  #53  
neilownz's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 1,769
Likes: 0
From: Fargo, ND
Default

hopefully when the weather turns shitty he will finish it this winter...
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2008 | 11:19 AM
  #54  
TiredGXP's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 677
Likes: 0
From: Sherwood Park, AB
Default

Originally Posted by neilownz
hopefully when the weather turns shitty he will finish it this winter...
That seems to be how things go. I get a bit stir crazy in the middle of our 7 month winter, and get more project related things done then

Somewhere earlier in this thread, I have pictures of the rear of the intake, I've shaved off the area where the MAP sensor would mount and have sealed off the area with a metal plate mounted on each side of the resulting hole, three bolts/nuts and generous amounts of RTV sealant between the plates. I have to order new seals for the intake runners since the ones that came with this unit look a bit rough.

I finally have my tune where I want it after installing the magnaflow, springs and rockers. The car's pulling consistent 0-60's of 5.5 seconds even on cold roads with all season tires (based on data logged using HPT). If I could ever get first gear traction, I'm sure 0-60's would be down to at least 5.3 seconds.

With the Comp 918 springs, I've bumped the first gear shift point to 6250 rpm (88 kmh or 55 mph), and am considering 6500, but I'm not sure what the DOD lifters can take (at 6500, that should be 96 kmh or 60 mph). Anyone bumped redline that far yet? I'm not sure that there's any point in bumping the redline any further until some airflow issues are resolved:
Data logs show that the stock intake system is causing some significant restrictions above ~5300 rpm. At my altitude, absolute atmospheric pressure almost never exceeds 93 kpa (compared to average sea level pressure of 101), I'm seeing MAP decreasing to 87 or 88 kpa at 6250 rpm, so intake restrictions are decreasing potential airflow by ~5.4 to 6.5% at the top end. If you look at the location of the MAP sensor, which is between the throttle body and the maniflod neck restriction, the measured restriction appears to be due to the stock airbox/intake tube (i have a K&N drop-in rather than a full CAI).
The question that remains unanswered is how much the manifold neck further restricts airflow. I suppose you could run a second MAP off the vacuum port located at the top of the manifold and see what pressure is present there. Maybe I should do that just to see if you can measure a pressure difference before and after the manifold neck.

Reply
Old Nov 30, 2008 | 01:45 PM
  #55  
07gxpgray's Avatar
Launching!
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 271
Likes: 1
From: Peoria, IL
Default

when it is done I would love this mod as well....i never could do all this stuff though.
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2008 | 01:58 PM
  #56  
Nacho SS's Avatar
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,560
Likes: 0
From: 805-818
Default

Originally Posted by 07gxpgray
when it is done I would love this mod as well....i never could do all this stuff though.
Ever think about retrofitting a kit and then selling them Tired? I'm sure there would be a solid 15 ordered from the LS4 section here, not even counting ClubGP.
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2008 | 03:06 PM
  #57  
TiredGXP's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 677
Likes: 0
From: Sherwood Park, AB
Default

Originally Posted by Nacho SS
Ever think about retrofitting a kit and then selling them Tired? I'm sure there would be a solid 15 ordered from the LS4 section here, not even counting ClubGP.
Well, in my regular profession, I'm the equivalent of $70/hr. Don't think I could recover the 30 - 40 or so hours of screwing around with hand tools that it took me to get this far.

The thing is, tool wise all you need is a dremel/die grinder, drill press and a few bits to do this (and someone who can weld aluminum). The only part that is really fiddly is rebuilding the DOD connector.

If I was to do it again, I'd probably go with a LS2 valley cover, reposition the OPSU mount and add on a Fast 90 and LS2 TB. There's just a few wiring changes between the LS2 and LS4 TB's, and I've seen a LS7 valley cover modified to allow a 90mm TB to be mounted in this orientation.

I am willing to post up a 1:1 dimensioned drawing of the TB adapter for anyone who wants to give it a shot. The template is easy enough to make - I made my template by tracing the manifold flange and TB flange on different pieces of paper and then just overlaying one over the other with enough rotation to allow the electrical connector to clear the manifold flange.

Reply
Old Feb 17, 2009 | 08:41 PM
  #58  
Panther427's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,401
Likes: 1
Default

Look at the truck 5.3 intakes, they are taller, and the mouting of the vacume lines might be differet, also look at the 5.3 on the trucks with DOD
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2009 | 12:01 AM
  #59  
Nacho SS's Avatar
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,560
Likes: 0
From: 805-818
Default

Update Update Update Tired, in the dead of winter, you SHOULD be working on this
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2009 | 12:14 AM
  #60  
TiredGXP's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 677
Likes: 0
From: Sherwood Park, AB
Default

Originally Posted by Nacho SS
Update Update Update Tired, in the dead of winter, you SHOULD be working on this
Ah, but all the nice comfy inside work is done. I'm not really into doing mechanical work in an unheated garage at -20*C (-4*F)

Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:49 AM.