Lingenfelter Ls4 Prototypes
10-02-2008, 12:13 AM
#1
Lingenfelter Ls4 Prototypes I recently contacted Lingenfelter about if they wanted to use my car over the winter to develop parts for the ls4 front drives they seem interested so far they replyed asking for a list of ideas so i gave them a big detailed list from all the stuff i have gathered around here i got a message back that said they forwarded it to their engineers so keep your fingers crossed people and maybe by summer there will be new parts on the horizon
10-02-2008, 06:31 AM
#3
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Eastern Iowa
Posts: 716
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Unless they can figure out a stroker kit. . . .mmmmmmm LS4 Stroker. . . .reminds me of:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D6N80z7-6g8
Okay I am ready now. . .
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D6N80z7-6g8
Okay I am ready now. . .
10-02-2008, 03:19 PM
#5
yeah i basically said that headers would be huge camshaft intake d shape and problems how forced induction destroys trannys and whatnot i also suggested extra wide fenders might be sweet to get bigger meats on there and that if they could get dod to work with all of it that would be ideal it was a long email but ill tell you when i hear from their engineers
10-02-2008, 08:03 PM
#7
yeah ill see what lingenfelter says first if there interested or whatever the thing that i like about them is they give you a warrenty on your car with your stuff im not sure about those other companys because lots of that stuff would ruin the factory warrenty
Trending Topics
10-27-2008, 01:31 AM
#14
On The Tree
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Miami Lakes FL
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
O-M-G!! A RWD Monte Carlo SS!!! with a V8! awesome! can you imagine someone slapping a third pedal in their? I always thought a Rwd at the very least would of been a great send off for the Monte SS
10-27-2008, 09:56 AM
#16
TECH Fanatic
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Reading, Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
They were probably thinking that it was cheaper to build the car on an existing platform rather than develop a new RWD platform to appeal to the very small minority of enthusiasts like us who care whether or not the car is RWD or not.
10-27-2008, 10:06 AM
#17
TECH Fanatic
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: LITH, IL.
Posts: 1,029
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
BINGO!
I went with the front-driver because I wanted something I could dd in the winter as I travel to some rather snowy places for work. I picked the SS BECAUSE it was fwd.
If I wanted a performance car instead of a peppy front driver, I would have bought one.
10-27-2008, 10:11 AM
#18
TECH Fanatic
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Reading, Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
And that was my exact view as well. I wanted a 4 door daily driver that still had some ***** to it. If I wanted an all out performance car, I would have looked elsewhere. It has fit the bill pretty well so far. Living in the NE having a hardcore performance car in the winter wasn't really an option for me.
10-27-2008, 12:11 PM
#20
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Decatur, TN (N-W of Athens)
Posts: 7,564
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
I recently contacted Lingenfelter about if they wanted to use my car over the winter to develop parts for the ls4 front drives they seem interested so far they replyed asking for a list of ideas so i gave them a big detailed list from all the stuff i have gathered around here i got a message back that said they forwarded it to their engineers so keep your fingers crossed people and maybe by summer there will be new parts on the horizon
https://ls1tech.com/forums/ls4-performance/997769-wackjob-ideas-get-freer-flowing-exhaust-manifolds.html