Fastest Stock LT1
#81
+1 that is true every guy i know with a fast car always says there car is faster than it is untill they show up at the track then the excuses began, so i dont believe **** unless i see it at the proving grounds i have heard dyno numbers and track numbers on here that i have just laughed out loud.
otherwise, they have not a clue what they are talking about..
dyno numbers and track times still dont usually add up.. i hate when people go off how much power they make...
#83
#84
i thought this discussion started on what is the fastest stock lt1 car???? I always knew stock to be stock internals with bolt ons(headers,cai,etc.) there is a guy around here running 11's with a stock motor.
#86
lemons12, I find it amusing to see you basically saying, "Just because someone saw something happen doesn't mean that's the way it should have or will usually happen."
I agree with you 100% that LS1's are faster stock for stock and mod for mod most of the time (because it is a fact), but you're arguing against people who are using the same logic that you've used to defend your arguments in other posts.
Just an observation that I found amusing
I agree with you 100% that LS1's are faster stock for stock and mod for mod most of the time (because it is a fact), but you're arguing against people who are using the same logic that you've used to defend your arguments in other posts.
Just an observation that I found amusing
#87
i agree with them 100% on almost everything.. i pay attention, and comprehend what i read.. you should have read more in the thread..
i like how you called out me.. haha, i was one of the few doing that exact same thing... nice try though..
i like how you called out me.. haha, i was one of the few doing that exact same thing... nice try though..
#88
I read the entire thread. Some people stated their personal experiences which were, by far not the norm, and you told them that. That's exactly what you did when you stated that it takes an aggressive heads/cam LT1 to beat a lid/catback LS1 (and that the LS1 will still out trap the LT1). You were going off of your personal experience, not the norm. That's the same thing they were doing here.
#89
I read the entire thread. Some people stated their personal experiences which were, by far not the norm, and you told them that. That's exactly what you did when you stated that it takes an aggressive heads/cam LT1 to beat a lid/catback LS1 (and that the LS1 will still out trap the LT1). You were going off of your personal experience, not the norm. That's the same thing they were doing here.
#90
...what? Do you go to the Chevy dealership and pick up a brand new Camaro with PS headers and K&N intake...? Well if not, then your idea of stock is different than most, I would think. Not trying to bash on you, but would everyone else agree that bolt-ons is nowhere near stock? If that were the case, there would be a ton of "stock" cars that were much faster than when they drove off the lot.
#91
...what? Do you go to the Chevy dealership and pick up a brand new Camaro with PS headers and K&N intake...? Well if not, then your idea of stock is different than most, I would think. Not trying to bash on you, but would everyone else agree that bolt-ons is nowhere near stock? If that were the case, there would be a ton of "stock" cars that were much faster than when they drove off the lot.
#92
what the ****?
Surprised this thread is not locked, alot of girls getting their panties in a wad. And get out of the LT1 section Lemons!
#93
LOL! We agreed. Well at least thats what I thought? Bone stock means no mods at all what so ever. But there are alot of "stock class" races where you can use DRs and gearing, computer work etc.
#94
Cool, it was hurting my eyes sifting through all the posts. Now lemons can go away
#95
or what?
you REALLY dont want me here do you? i thought we were all friends...
----------LOL! We agreed. Well at least thats what I thought? Bone stock means no mods at all what so ever. But there are alot of "stock class" races where you can use DRs and gearing, computer work etc.----------
i understand that stock is no mods.. i have argued that MANY times.. and yes "Stock classes" dont always mean "stock".. i dont agree with that though..
you REALLY dont want me here do you? i thought we were all friends...
----------LOL! We agreed. Well at least thats what I thought? Bone stock means no mods at all what so ever. But there are alot of "stock class" races where you can use DRs and gearing, computer work etc.----------
i understand that stock is no mods.. i have argued that MANY times.. and yes "Stock classes" dont always mean "stock".. i dont agree with that though..
#96
Agree or not thats how it is. For instance STOCK Eliminator class racing
http://www.hotrodders.com/forum/stoc...ator-5481.html see post 2 for rules
http://www.hotrodders.com/forum/stoc...ator-5481.html see post 2 for rules
#97
Agree or not thats how it is. For instance STOCK Eliminator class racing
http://www.hotrodders.com/forum/stoc...ator-5481.html see post 2 for rules
http://www.hotrodders.com/forum/stoc...ator-5481.html see post 2 for rules
how do they know if you port stock heads or have a VERY stealthy cam.. or something of that nature? or on our cars.. port the intake?
#99