Getting ready to del all this to Speedinc!
11-25-2008, 07:24 PM
#261
Me and a buddy were driving home from work and two punks pull up to us. They start messing with us off a stop light so I punched it caught a great gear and they didnt!LOL!
We were laughing and waving(givin them the bird) at them the entire time. They were so pissed!LOL!
The toilet(DD) is 1-0 LOL!!!
We were laughing and waving(givin them the bird) at them the entire time. They were so pissed!LOL!
The toilet(DD) is 1-0 LOL!!!
11-25-2008, 08:43 PM
#266
hha this is crazy iirc you put down 280/310ish with just a catback and i did 282/315 with just headers
now you do 410/362 with H/C and i made 415/368 with my H/C setup
now you do 410/362 with H/C and i made 415/368 with my H/C setup
11-25-2008, 08:44 PM
#267
As much as I love the S60, I was thinking it would cost you more than that.
Sounds like the cutout helped a lot too, you might want to consider
a dual setup as a winter project. I bet there's more power in there.
11-25-2008, 09:05 PM
#268
TECH Apprentice
Heh...Well, I'd upload my dynosheet but I'm at work. But it's not like these are #'s I'd like to make up lol.
I made 296rwhp and 315rwtq on a Mustang dyno. FWIW the pushrods I were running were .10 too long, so I they ended up stopping the pull due to valvetrain issues at 5700. It's not much of an excuse, but I might have at least eeked the 300rwhp mark.
The BS part is that my parts list doesn't exactly suck. I have really good heads and supporting mods. My intake is a tad restrictive being a non RPM style (Edelbrock), but nothing I'd guess give or take 10hp. It does make great tq on the street though.
Basically I was going to add a vortec s-trim at 10-12psi and see how that does. It should put me @ 420rwhp.....but it still bugs me needing a power adder to do so.
At least it's pretty lol
I made 296rwhp and 315rwtq on a Mustang dyno. FWIW the pushrods I were running were .10 too long, so I they ended up stopping the pull due to valvetrain issues at 5700. It's not much of an excuse, but I might have at least eeked the 300rwhp mark.
The BS part is that my parts list doesn't exactly suck. I have really good heads and supporting mods. My intake is a tad restrictive being a non RPM style (Edelbrock), but nothing I'd guess give or take 10hp. It does make great tq on the street though.
Basically I was going to add a vortec s-trim at 10-12psi and see how that does. It should put me @ 420rwhp.....but it still bugs me needing a power adder to do so.
At least it's pretty lol
11-25-2008, 09:10 PM
#269
410/362 was b4 the S60 and cut out.
Who did your heads and what cam do you have in there?
Damn I need to find a couple more poniesLOL! James looks like that true dual suggestion is looking pretty good LOL!
11-25-2008, 09:16 PM
#270
In the April 2008 issue, GMHTP swapped in and compared the S60 to the stock 3.42 10-bolt. Dyno numbers went from 412.5 / 390.0 to 397.9 / 376.0 (-14.6 HP / -14.0 TQ, 3.5% / 3.6% loss). Sounds right on.
I have the B&B TriFlo as well and always thought that it flowed well. Looks like a cutout may be in my near future as well with those results.
I have the B&B TriFlo as well and always thought that it flowed well. Looks like a cutout may be in my near future as well with those results.
11-25-2008, 09:43 PM
#274
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Carol Stream Il.
Posts: 1,523
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
AC, it turned out even better than I thought it would, congrats. 
Now you have me wondering about are little match come spring. I better have all my ducks in a row, and maybe find a few more to have a chance that day.
Now you have me wondering about are little match come spring. I better have all my ducks in a row, and maybe find a few more to have a chance that day.
11-25-2008, 09:43 PM
#275
And apparently, more efficient LOL
I suspect that we will see more S60s in the next few years as people abandon their 9"s
(That's my personal opinion, feel free to bring this thread back to life in 3 years and flame me)
me 
11-25-2008, 10:52 PM
#278
RSbeast, that's a great looking mustang you got there! Should be an animal with the blower! I'm sure it's plenty fun as it sits 
From what I've seen people tend to over estimate the power they will lose by going with an aftermarket rears. Definitely a good way to go about it so that you have a much better chance of being pleasantly suprised instead of disappointed.
From what I've seen people tend to over estimate the power they will lose by going with an aftermarket rears. Definitely a good way to go about it so that you have a much better chance of being pleasantly suprised instead of disappointed.
11-25-2008, 11:09 PM
#279
Launching!
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Port Charlotte, FL
Posts: 262
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So wait, this was all done on a stock displacement/shortblock LT1?
Anyone mind PMing me a # on the install/build cost? Or even just the install end of things?
.....most days I wonder why I ever even thought of messing with my mustang. I'm embarassed to even tell what my h/c/i 5.0 put out
Anyone mind PMing me a # on the install/build cost? Or even just the install end of things?
.....most days I wonder why I ever even thought of messing with my mustang. I'm embarassed to even tell what my h/c/i 5.0 put out
You used some pretty good parts for the build, but very MILD parts.
The AFR165s are a great head that flow very well for very small 165cc ports.
They can not be compared to a stock LT1 casting that has been ported by a pro like AI or Lloyd. The ported LT1 castings usually have a 200 or larger CC port that flow as good as the AFR195s. Add 50 more cubes and a very short runner intake into the mix with quite a bit larger cam and it is a given that the H/C/I lt1 would make more power.
His setup would compare more to a 347 or a 351 with AFR205s, a Custom cam 232/236 .600/.600 110lsa cam, with a Trick Flow Box intake.
I had a fox coupe that I did a similar build to yours. It was a 331 that had afr165s, Cobra intake, and an E303. I never had it on a dyno in that trim, but I bet it barely made 300 whp. On 17" Cobra Rs it ran a 13.1 @ 109. I slapped stock pullied S -Trim on it and it made 485/481. With a slipping clutch and a weak 1.8 60 Ft it did an 11.6 @ 126. I wish that I took it back to the track on slicks with the spec3. I am pretty sure it would have went a 10.8 @ 128
Get the S-Trim (a V2 SQ would be preffered due to a slightly better step up ratio)
BTW, that is a nice SN95.
O.K Back on topic
Last edited by mpe331lx; 11-25-2008 at 11:29 PM.
