LT1-LT4 Modifications 1993-97 Gen II Small Block V8

LE 232/240 cam

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 5, 2009 | 11:38 PM
  #1  
tspence45's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Addict
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,153
Likes: 1
From: Monmouth, Illinois
Default LE 232/240 cam

Well, I've been looking more into cams lately, since a buddy of mine, who has been to school for motor building, has told me he'd help me out with it. I was looking for a nice mid-range cam, between the CC503, and the 306. And, I think I found just the cam. The LE 232/240 .584"/.584" 108LSA. I was just wondering if anyone on here is running this cam, and if anyone has any video clips of it's idle. Also, does anyone know if Lloyd's lift numbers are with 1.5 rockers, or 1.6's? I ask, because I'm going to be running it on 1.7RR's. If his numbers are with 1.6's, I should be fine, since I'll be running the Patriot Gold spring kit(.650" max lift).
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2009 | 12:10 AM
  #2  
blake110106's Avatar
TECH Regular
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 429
Likes: 0
From: Bremen, Ky
Default

Ive been wondering on his lift also. Im looking at running his 228/235/ .560/.560 109lsa cam on 1.6's is his lift is will 1.5 then that put that cam at .597 lift. I just hope the duration isnt high enough with that lift that it would cause a PTV clearance issue.

With the cam your looking at you'd be close to a safety point I wouldnt want to go over(.630) if his cam lift is based on 1.6 rocker with a 1.7 rocker(.620"). If its based on a 1.5 rocker then the 1.6 rocker will have slightly more lift (.623") That would be the only thing to worry me tho

Last edited by blake110106; Jan 6, 2009 at 12:19 AM.
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2009 | 01:11 AM
  #3  
za355tx's Avatar
TECH Resident
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (109)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 994
Likes: 2
From: Dfw
Default

His cams are based on a 1.6 rocker.
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2009 | 01:24 AM
  #4  
blake110106's Avatar
TECH Regular
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 429
Likes: 0
From: Bremen, Ky
Default

Originally Posted by za355tx
His cams are based on a 1.6 rocker.
Thats good news!
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2009 | 01:27 AM
  #5  
96lt1m6's Avatar
TECH Junkie
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,782
Likes: 3
From: LA$ VEGA$
Default

PTV clearence should not be an issue,the only issue i see is your installed spring height needs to be checked closely
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2009 | 01:50 AM
  #6  
tspence45's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Addict
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,153
Likes: 1
From: Monmouth, Illinois
Default

Thanks for the info guys. Now, I just need some clips. I bet it's got a pretty nasty idle, being on a 108LSA and all. That's what I want, a nice, lopey cam, but usable on stock heads.
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2009 | 02:23 AM
  #7  
LM97Z's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,291
Likes: 0
From: S.W. Missouri
Default

If you plan on that cam, you really need to call Lloyd, i'm sure it'll be a bit much, he spec'd out a cam for mine on a 109 LSA, said it'll pull good to 61-6200, have a choppy idle, but still work very well with stock heads, also was worth 10 & 10 (at the wheels) over the cc503, that cam your looking at is for his LE2 heads, & i'm sure it'll pull till 6600+, might be a bit much for a stock bottom end, i would personally stay in the 224/230 range on a 109-110 LSA, 226-232 @ 50 tops. This is the cam he spec'd for me with stock heads, but would still work great with LE1 heads (another 30 rwhp) if i upgrated later.

565/565-223/230 @ 50 on a 109 LSA, (1.6 rockers), 1700-6100

Great torgue & great in the mid-range with top-end pull.
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2009 | 02:35 AM
  #8  
tspence45's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Addict
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,153
Likes: 1
From: Monmouth, Illinois
Default

Yeah, I was thinking it could also be a bit much. I've also been kind of eye-balling his 228/235 .560"/.560" 109LSA cam 1900-6200rpm. In the description it says it's the best choice for a stock bottom end. In the description for the 232/240 cam, it still just says 2200-6400. I doubt that extra 200rpm is really going to make that big of a difference.
Reply
LS1 Tech Stories

The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time

story-0

Amazing '71 Camaro Restomod Is Modern Muscle Car Under the Skin

 Verdad Gallardo
story-1

6 Common C5 Corvette Failures and What's Involved In Repairing Them

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-2

Retro Modern Bandit Pontiac Trans AM Comes With Burt Reynolds' Autograph

 Verdad Gallardo
story-3

Top 10 Greatest Cadillac V Series Performance Models Ever, Ranked

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-4

Top 10 Most Powerful Chevy Trucks Ever Made!

 
story-5

Hennessey's New Supercharged Silverado ZR2 Has 700 HP

 Verdad Gallardo
story-6

Coachbuilt N2A Anteros Is an LS2-Powered C6 Corvette In Italian Clothes

 Verdad Gallardo
story-7

Awesome K5 Blazer Restomod Comes With C7 Corvette Power

 Verdad Gallardo
story-8

10 Camaros You Should Never Buy

 
story-9

10 LS Engine Myths That Refuse to Die

 Verdad Gallardo
Old Jan 6, 2009 | 06:14 AM
  #9  
joelster's Avatar
10 Second Club
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,630
Likes: 28
Default

You guys can't just throw those springs on a stock head and assume they will be good for .630" of lift. They have to be installed at the correct height to be able to handle .630" of lift too. When we put my springs on my car, my builder didn't like how much clearance there was at maximum lift, so we ordered a set of locks that increase the install height slightly. It is most definitly something you'll want to check out.
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2009 | 10:23 AM
  #10  
AChotrod's Avatar
11 Second Club
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 9,896
Likes: 1
From: Chicago area
Default

Originally Posted by za355tx
His cams are based on a 1.6 rocker.
The specs you posted look to be for 1.6 RRs.
But the cam I just got from him the cam card was for 1.5 Rockers. LOL! I thought i got the wrong cam at first.
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2009 | 10:27 AM
  #11  
Elliott's94Z's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,370
Likes: 1
From: Oregon Grown
Default

Originally Posted by AChotrod
The specs you posted look to be for 1.6 RRs.
But the cam I just got from him the cam card was for 1.5 Rockers. LOL! I thought i got the wrong cam at first.
You did get the wrong cam actually. I sent Lloyd my stock one and told him to send it to you wrapped up in his box
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2009 | 10:50 AM
  #12  
LM97Z's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,291
Likes: 0
From: S.W. Missouri
Default

Originally Posted by tspence45
Yeah, I was thinking it could also be a bit much. I've also been kind of eye-balling his 228/235 .560"/.560" 109LSA cam 1900-6200rpm. In the description it says it's the best choice for a stock bottom end. In the description for the 232/240 cam, it still just says 2200-6400. I doubt that extra 200rpm is really going to make that big of a difference.
That would be a better choice, just remember, even that cam is going to need gears to really shine, i would still call Lloyd, find out what springs would work for that cam, these are one of the springs he recammened i use for the cam he spec'd for me, i'm sure they will also work with the 228/235, they are a "strong" single spring from crane, the plus side, there around 100.00 bucks . He assured me they would work & hold up great. ( crane-98215-16), BTW, they will work with your stock retainers/locks too, but like any spring, you still need to check installed height for proper seat/open pressure.

I think you'll be much happier with the 228/235 cam, it'll still sound nasty on that 109 LSA, & pull like a **** in the upper RPMs, mid-range will be awsome without sacraficing too much bottom end torgue, & if you decide to upgrade to even the LE1 heads later, should be worth 40 rwhp i'm sure.
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2009 | 10:55 AM
  #13  
ss.slp.ls1's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (36)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 8,184
Likes: 28
From: Orange County, CA
Default

Originally Posted by LM97Z
If you plan on that cam, you really need to call Lloyd, i'm sure it'll be a bit much, he spec'd out a cam for mine on a 109 LSA, said it'll pull good to 61-6200, have a choppy idle, but still work very well with stock heads, also was worth 10 & 10 (at the wheels) over the cc503, that cam your looking at is for his LE2 heads, & i'm sure it'll pull till 6600+, might be a bit much for a stock bottom end, i would personally stay in the 224/230 range on a 109-110 LSA, 226-232 @ 50 tops. This is the cam he spec'd for me with stock heads, but would still work great with LE1 heads (another 30 rwhp) if i upgrated later.

565/565-223/230 @ 50 on a 109 LSA, (1.6 rockers), 1700-6100

Great torgue & great in the mid-range with top-end pull.
^^^I would listen to this guy, he makes a lot of sense.
Also, there is no reason to run 1.7 rr's with that large of a cam. I would stick with the tried and the true, 1.6 CC promagnum rr's.
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2009 | 11:00 AM
  #14  
Elliott's94Z's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,370
Likes: 1
From: Oregon Grown
Default

Originally Posted by LM97Z
That would be a better choice, just remember, even that cam is going to need gears to really shine, i would still call Lloyd, find out what springs would work for that cam, these are one of the springs he recammened i use for the cam he spec'd for me, i'm sure they will also work with the 228/235, they are a "strong" single spring from crane, the plus side, there around 100.00 bucks . He assured me they would work & hold up great. ( crane-98215-16), BTW, they will work with your stock retainers/locks too, but like any spring, you still need to check installed height for proper seat/open pressure.

I think you'll be much happier with the 228/235 cam, it'll still sound nasty on that 109 LSA, & pull like a **** in the upper RPMs, mid-range will be awsome without sacraficing too much bottom end torgue, & if you decide to upgrade to even the LE1 heads later, should be worth 40 rwhp i'm sure.
+1 for the 228/235 on the 109 lsa...be a great choice and a strong runner
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2009 | 11:57 AM
  #15  
3DFORMULA's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 625
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Elliott's94Z
You did get the wrong cam actually. I sent Lloyd my stock one and told him to send it to you wrapped up in his box
That'd be rotten.
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2009 | 12:46 PM
  #16  
AChotrod's Avatar
11 Second Club
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 9,896
Likes: 1
From: Chicago area
Default

Sure as hell sounds good with a stock cam then!!!!! Good deal!!
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2009 | 05:24 AM
  #17  
NightTrain66's Avatar
LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 414
Likes: 1
From: Texas
Default

Those 98215 springs are a Howards Cams spring part #. They are Electro polished and have good pressure. I would not bat an eye about using them on a cam with less than .570 lift, lmid 220 duration and less than 6300 RPM. They will work with the 223/230 .565/.565 cam with no worries BUT I would suggest a different spring for the 228/235.

Only reason to use the Howards 98215 spring is if you are on a tight budget and running a small cam. I would use the Crane dbl springs that I use on my LE1 heads (or Patriot Gold extremes or PAC 1218 bee hives) with the 228/235 cam.

Lloyd
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2009 | 07:04 AM
  #18  
bombebomb's Avatar
TECH Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 440
Likes: 0
From: Ohio
Default

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jifx49pnUIA
sounds clip of a very similer cam
231/239 forget exact life with rockers something like 565/585 110 lsa
As always the video's never do cammed guys justice.
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2009 | 08:35 AM
  #19  
ks my ss's Avatar
Launching!
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 261
Likes: 1
From: ofallon mo
Default

here is mine. its a slightly larger custom fms with more lift. its a stock bottom end with 2.5" duals

http://www.mofbody.com/blkchevyz/brian.MOV
Reply




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:40 PM.

story-0
Amazing '71 Camaro Restomod Is Modern Muscle Car Under the Skin

Slideshow: This heavily modified 1971 Camaro mixes classic muscle car styling with a fifth-generation Camaro interior and modern LS3 power.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:06:42


VIEW MORE
story-1
6 Common C5 Corvette Failures and What's Involved In Repairing Them

Slideshow: From wobbling harmonic balancers to failed EBCMs, these are the issues that define long-term C5 ownership and what repairs typically involve.

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-05-07 18:44:57


VIEW MORE
story-2
Retro Modern Bandit Pontiac Trans AM Comes With Burt Reynolds' Autograph

Slideshow: A modern Camaro transformed into a retro icon, this limited-run "Bandit" build blends nostalgia with brute force in a way few revivals manage.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-21 13:57:02


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 Greatest Cadillac V Series Performance Models Ever, Ranked

Slideshow: Cadillac didn't just crash the high-performance luxury vehicle party, it showed up loud, supercharged, and occasionally a little unhinged...

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-04-16 10:05:15


VIEW MORE
story-4
Top 10 Most Powerful Chevy Trucks Ever Made!

Slideshow: Top ten most powerful Chevy trucks ever made

By | 2026-03-25 09:22:26


VIEW MORE
story-5
Hennessey's New Supercharged Silverado ZR2 Has 700 HP

Slideshow: Hennessey has turned the Silverado ZR2 into a 700-hp off-road monster with supercharged V8 power and a limited production run.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-03-24 18:57:52


VIEW MORE
story-6
Coachbuilt N2A Anteros Is an LS2-Powered C6 Corvette In Italian Clothes

Slideshow: A one-off sports car that looks like a vintage Italian exotic-but hides a C6 Corvette underneath-just sold for the price of a new mid-engine Corvette.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-03-23 18:53:41


VIEW MORE
story-7
Awesome K5 Blazer Restomod Comes With C7 Corvette Power

Slideshow: A heavily reworked 1972 K5 Blazer swaps its off-road roots for a low-slung street-focused build with modern V8 power.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-03-09 18:08:45


VIEW MORE
story-8
10 Camaros You Should Never Buy

Slideshow: There are thousands of used Camaros on the market but we think you should avoid these 10

By | 2026-02-17 17:09:30


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 LS Engine Myths That Refuse to Die

Slideshows: Which one of these myths do you believe?

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-01-28 18:10:11


VIEW MORE