is 340whp reasonable?
#47
#48
Thanks for throwing that up Scott. Its like we need to sticky my friggin' dyno graph around here.
Yeah, the AZ DynoChip dyno is definitely not generous.
You can see where my unported heads just stop flowing around 6200rpm. This CC306 would pull to the moon if my heads were ported.
The CC306/1.6 RR combo is great. It may be an old design, but it works, even with stock heads. I installed that cam back in 2003 and would buy it again tomorrow. Lots of torque, lots of horsepower, and nice curves on both.
Yeah, the AZ DynoChip dyno is definitely not generous.
You can see where my unported heads just stop flowing around 6200rpm. This CC306 would pull to the moon if my heads were ported.
The CC306/1.6 RR combo is great. It may be an old design, but it works, even with stock heads. I installed that cam back in 2003 and would buy it again tomorrow. Lots of torque, lots of horsepower, and nice curves on both.
#49
Banned
iTrader: (12)
Thanks for throwing that up Scott. Its like we need to sticky my friggin' dyno graph around here.
Yeah, the AZ DynoChip dyno is definitely not generous.
You can see where my unported heads just stop flowing around 6200rpm. This CC306 would pull to the moon if my heads were ported.
The CC306/1.6 RR combo is great. It may be an old design, but it works, even with stock heads. I installed that cam back in 2003 and would buy it again tomorrow. Lots of torque, lots of horsepower, and nice curves on both.
Yeah, the AZ DynoChip dyno is definitely not generous.
You can see where my unported heads just stop flowing around 6200rpm. This CC306 would pull to the moon if my heads were ported.
The CC306/1.6 RR combo is great. It may be an old design, but it works, even with stock heads. I installed that cam back in 2003 and would buy it again tomorrow. Lots of torque, lots of horsepower, and nice curves on both.
#52
12 Second Club
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: San Marcos, TX
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I dynoed 338rwhp with the 306, 1.6/1.5 split rockers, LTs, Full bolt ons, and STOCK HEADS on a MUSTANG DYNO. Im thinking that would be around 365rwhp on DynoJet. Correct me if im wrong.
#54
Heads are in the the future. The car runs so dang perfect right now that I just don't want to mess with it though.
Yeah, probably around there. Replace the 1.5s with 1.6s and get it on a Dynojet.
#57
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (11)
People assume it will only get 10-15 because that's what everyone sees when it's one of the first mods they do when they're doing boltons. But if it's holding back a setup that requires more air you could see more.
From what I've read on this forum headers at least 30-35 rwhp on a stock LS7 vette.