Finally have some track results for my Ai 200cc heads/cam combo
#21
I was gonna say the same thing. 2 tenths and 2 mph.
What exactly did you change? If it was simply a cam swap i'd say that was a decent improvement, but you did heads/cam and only gained that, i'd say yikes.
#23
Thanks, Jeremy Formato did my tune.
What he said.
What he said.
#24
Congrats on the new best. I'm happy your results were exactly what you wanted. You've had a long hard road with the car, but the results look worth it.
I think with simple changes you have .5 and another couple mph left. Weight reduction, EWP and some tire. 120mph to start is astounding.
I think with simple changes you have .5 and another couple mph left. Weight reduction, EWP and some tire. 120mph to start is astounding.
#25
What tires are you running?
#26
.2 and 2 mph was defiantly worth it to me considering the added reliability. The car also drives completely different on the street. The increase in low end and mid range torque was very substantial, so I didn't just gain power at the peaks.
#27
Nice times, I have nearly the same set-up as you and my goal was high 11s. I will be installing a 9" and 4:11s before I head to the track tho, I hurt my 10 bolt the first time I shifted hard at over 6000 RPMs. I hope the 10 bolt holds up on the dyno, I'm shooting for the same numbers you make.
What injectors are you running? I'm seeing high 80s to mid 90 duty cycle on my 32lb racetronix injectors at 6000 RPMs.
What injectors are you running? I'm seeing high 80s to mid 90 duty cycle on my 32lb racetronix injectors at 6000 RPMs.
#28
Congrats on the new best. I'm happy your results were exactly what you wanted. You've had a long hard road with the car, but the results look worth it.
I think with simple changes you have .5 and another couple mph left. Weight reduction, EWP and some tire. 120mph to start is astounding.
I think with simple changes you have .5 and another couple mph left. Weight reduction, EWP and some tire. 120mph to start is astounding.
Nice times, I have nearly the same set-up as you and my goal was high 11s. I will be installing a 9" and 4:11s before I head to the track tho, I hurt my 10 bolt the first time I shifted hard at over 6000 RPMs. I hope the 10 bolt holds up on the dyno, I'm shooting for the same numbers you make.
What injectors are you running? I'm seeing high 80s to mid 90 duty cycle on my 32lb racetronix injectors at 6000 RPMs.
What injectors are you running? I'm seeing high 80s to mid 90 duty cycle on my 32lb racetronix injectors at 6000 RPMs.
#29
SpeedDemon, we are just happy to see the car running as it should. After all you went through in the past, our goal was primarily to provide equal or better top-end performance without the trade-offs. It's a lot tougher to get a stick car down the track with enough power to trap over 120 vs. autos that make average power. If you did as these guys suggest you probably would gain another quarter second & a couple mph from tire/gear changes. If the thing works as it is though, my inclination would be to leave it alone & just beat on it.
Take Care
#31
Very nice times once again but dont try and make the LE set up look bad. Im making aprox 150hp over my last dyno, with my LE set up and I could drive it every day as a DD. Not sure what happened with your last set up so I cant speak about that. But I can tell you Im really happy with mine. Now I just need to wait for the track to open back up.
AI set ups are killer so dont get me wrong.
AI set ups are killer so dont get me wrong.
#35
#36
I don't know. Why does it matter? It is results from the same car complete package vs. complete package. If there was a problem with the package that was a problem with the package as delivered by the vendor, still an accurate comparison.
#37
I am curious if it was the LE1.5 224/230 high lift cam that ran low 12's which in its own right is pretty decent.
#38
Unless my old threads/posts were deleted a simple search would show what happened with my old setup.
#39
All I asked was a very simple question and it may not matter to anyone except for me and thats beside the point. I am not going to start a pissing contest so dont get so defensive.
I am curious if it was the LE1.5 224/230 high lift cam that ran low 12's which in its own right is pretty decent.
I am curious if it was the LE1.5 224/230 high lift cam that ran low 12's which in its own right is pretty decent.