LT1-LT4 Modifications 1993-97 Gen II Small Block V8

my dyno, does this sound right??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-10-2009, 08:16 PM
  #1  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
dante1313's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 151
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default my dyno, does this sound right??

i just bought my motor last year right out the crate. idk if that makes a differnece (20,000 miles) . but my mods r in my sig. i am UNTUNED and the 100 shot will be here tomorrow. as of today i made 241hp and 280tq to the wheels....i am very disappointed, thought i would get more.....does this seem right? and what should i do nex beside getting a tune and hooking up my 100 shot.
Old 02-10-2009, 08:20 PM
  #2  
TECH Resident
 
moderate Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Valdosta Ga.
Posts: 900
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Seems a little low but I wouldnt trust dynos too much. You need to see what it traps in the 1/4. Thats the realistic approach.
Old 02-10-2009, 08:23 PM
  #3  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
dante1313's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 151
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

kk it was a land sea dyno if that makes a differnece, i heard dynojet rate 10-11% higher so that would read me at about 275hp and like 310tq idk thats what i was told...
Old 02-10-2009, 08:24 PM
  #4  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (108)
 
za355tx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Dfw
Posts: 969
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

What trans do you have? If you have an auto that still seems a bit low. But if you have an M6 yes it's definately low. Some dyno's aren't exactly accurate. I had a heads and cam Lt1 that only put down like 310rwhp. Then sold them to a guy on cz28.com. He puts down like 450 Rwhp with similer mods and a much bigger cam. Basically I'm saying some dynoes read very low while others read very high. Track times are all that really matter though right?
Old 02-10-2009, 08:24 PM
  #5  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (13)
 
jsteele90's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: delaware
Posts: 2,871
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

auto or manual?
Old 02-10-2009, 08:26 PM
  #6  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
dante1313's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 151
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

auto..
Old 02-10-2009, 08:26 PM
  #7  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (13)
 
jsteele90's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: delaware
Posts: 2,871
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

sounds about right then. who cares about dyno #s. track #s are all that matter
Old 02-10-2009, 08:29 PM
  #8  
TECH Resident
 
nik1703's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Redondo Beach, CA
Posts: 968
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

dude, that sounds like stock numbers, either something is wrong with your car or the dyno.

you should be in the low 300's with those mods.
Old 02-10-2009, 08:31 PM
  #9  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
dante1313's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 151
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by nik1703
dude, that sounds like stock numbers, either something is wrong with your car or the dyno.

you should be in the low 300's with those mods.
thats what i thought...can it be because im not tuned?
Old 02-10-2009, 08:42 PM
  #10  
Staging Lane
 
WH97Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Omaha,Ne
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I would say get the car tuned! You could free up alot of power right there. Also most of the dyno number I see on these forums sound like a bunch of BS for what they have done. I have about the same set up I will check my dyno sheets and post the numbers both N/a and with a 150 shot.
Old 02-10-2009, 10:28 PM
  #11  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (8)
 
gregrob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: 6,000+ feet
Posts: 5,130
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Run it on a dynojet or superflow. My .02
Old 02-10-2009, 10:33 PM
  #12  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Formula350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Decatur, TN (N-W of Athens)
Posts: 7,564
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

That's right on a the money for an A4. Actually maybe a bit HIGH with a Flowmaster (heh I'm serious, dyno proven power suckers on our cars, well at least the Flowmaster 80 series that are MADE for F-Bodies)
Old 02-10-2009, 10:55 PM
  #13  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (17)
 
AChotrod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Chicago area
Posts: 9,896
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I made 280/317 stock tune with a catback, your numbers dont sound good but not impossible
Old 02-10-2009, 10:57 PM
  #14  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Formula350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Decatur, TN (N-W of Athens)
Posts: 7,564
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by AChotrod
I made 280/317 stock tune with a catback, your numbers dont sound good but not impossible
Yours was a freak and catback helps. Not to mention M6 which is an automatic +15-20hp.
Old 02-11-2009, 12:06 AM
  #15  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (31)
 
96lt1m6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: LA$ VEGA$
Posts: 3,782
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Hmmm,
i feel the mods listed w/ an A4 are about right. i am SURE OP is getting knock retard and without a tune those numbers are definately believable
dynos are for tunning and often masterbating ones ego! if your air/fuel is good, no knock retard pull the straps off and hit the staging lanes......

Last edited by 96lt1m6; 02-11-2009 at 12:17 AM.
Old 02-11-2009, 09:12 AM
  #16  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
dante1313's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 151
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by WH97Z
I would say get the car tuned! You could free up alot of power right there. Also most of the dyno number I see on these forums sound like a bunch of BS for what they have done. I have about the same set up I will check my dyno sheets and post the numbers both N/a and with a 150 shot.
yea i wanna see thx!
Old 02-11-2009, 09:22 AM
  #17  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (8)
 
sdm1234's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Holland Twp/Milford, New Jersey
Posts: 1,420
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by nik1703
you should be in the low 300's with those mods.
low 300s is more like a full bolt-on M6. he's an auto with just exhaust.

to the OP: you said you got this as a crate motor? i'm not sure if i'm correct here, but maybe you got an earlier year crate motor rather than the '96/'97.
Old 02-11-2009, 09:25 AM
  #18  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (36)
 
ss.slp.ls1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 8,188
Received 26 Likes on 24 Posts

Default

I know there are a lot of variances with dynos, but I still don't that it's enough to account for your LOW #'s. With headers and a CAI, no N2O and no tune, you should be seeing at least 275rwhp. Even with an A4. Now add N2O and the number should be higher still...
Old 02-11-2009, 09:29 AM
  #19  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (36)
 
ss.slp.ls1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 8,188
Received 26 Likes on 24 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by sdm1234
low 300s is more like a full bolt-on M6. he's an auto with just exhaust.

to the OP: you said you got this as a crate motor? i'm not sure if i'm correct here, but maybe you got an earlier year crate motor rather than the '96/'97.
You mean like a '93-'95 LT1? What does that have to do with anything?
And a CAI, headers, exhaust is almost all of the bolt-ons, short of 1.6 rr's and maybe a 52mm TB. I'd say the rr's and TB would probably account for 15-20 rwhp. Which should leave him at around 275rwhp like I stated earlier.
Old 02-11-2009, 09:42 AM
  #20  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (8)
 
sdm1234's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Holland Twp/Milford, New Jersey
Posts: 1,420
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ss.slp.ls1
You mean like a '93-'95 LT1? What does that have to do with anything?
And a CAI, headers, exhaust is almost all of the bolt-ons, short of 1.6 rr's and maybe a 52mm TB. I'd say the rr's and TB would probably account for 15-20 rwhp. Which should leave him at around 275rwhp like I stated earlier.
Because the earlier LT1s were rated at 265hp with the iron heads and 275 with alum heads. hmmm, does the OP have a KM? maybe with the loud exhaust it's retarding timing.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:54 AM.