Bbk or pace
(1 - (Burnout Time Till Popped Tire ÷ Radius of Said Tire)) × (Weight of Car ÷ 2) ÷ 2 = RW TQ in ft/lbs.
To find the RWHP it's simple as you take the RW TQ and multiply by .85 for M6 or .78 for A4
Example: My car with shorties, full exhaust and CAI.
8mins till tire poppage ÷ 13" (assuming 26" tire) = 0.61538461538461538461538461538462, we'll say 0.6154
1 - 0.6154 = 0.3846.
3500lbs ÷ 2 = 1750
0.3846 × 1750 = 673.05
673.05 ÷ 2 = 336.525ft/lbs at the wheels.
HP would be:
etc etc
336.525 × .85 = 286.05HP at the wheels. M6
336.525 × .78 = 262.49HP at the wheels. A4

(NOTE: I made all that up, I absolutely suck at math to boot, but it's believable numbers huh?)
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
It has been widely accepted that long tubes make more power and torque than shorties - period. This is not debatable. You're spouting off that shorties make more torque in every application, not because you've conducted extensive testing on an engine dyno using different exhaust components, but because you have "been in races" and you've "seen and felt the difference."
And you wonder why you're getting flak. You're making yourself out to be some type of header pro when your suggestion claims otherwise, and goes against almost ever person in this forum - including myself.
And about Edelbrock - they're trying to sell a product. Of course they're going to claim they make more power/torque. Perhaps you'll suggest that their new "air gap" manifold is worth it too?
If you feel shorties will give you torque, more power to you (or, would that be less power to you?). You won't catch me with Edelbrock shorties on my car. Garbage.

Oh, STALKER!

I'm now kinda curious if my formula actually would hold up lol Anyone got some crap rims and $100 to spend on some FUZION tires to test it out?


