LT1-LT4 Modifications 1993-97 Gen II Small Block V8

Bbk or pace

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-06-2009 | 09:24 PM
  #61  
RamAir95TA's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 9,467
Likes: 7
From: South Jersey
Default

Originally Posted by FAcToRyFReaKeD
I dont bother reading stupid messes.. im sure no one does either.. !!!!For torque!!!!!!!Stock-bolt on cars!!!!!! prefer shorties to long tubes. Cammed, h/c cars obviously prefer lt's, im not debating that, its obvious. Dont worry if you need clarification im not a "header dyno expert watcher whatever. Any body thats made the swap will tell you same. Some of yous really need to clean your stuff up.
Hmmm...that's funny. I switched from mids to long tubes in my bolt-on days and gained a full tenth.
Old 03-06-2009 | 09:49 PM
  #62  
chavez885's Avatar
TECH Addict

iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,382
Likes: 1
From: Concord, CA
Default

Originally Posted by FAcToRyFReaKeD



You write like a dope. Yes seen races been in races. Are you really going to deny shorties produce more torque!? Maybe youll call edelbrock and slp to tell them that there claims of more tourqe are fictional too?










































Old 03-06-2009 | 10:14 PM
  #63  
94Z28-MSTGKLR's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,434
Likes: 2
From: Lacey, WA
Default

WOW! I was going to buy a set of pacesetters for my factory...stock (except GMMG) set up but I can see clearly now...I just need to stick with the factory manifolds because they are the bomb. I feel sorry for all the guys with LT's for all the money they have wasted. If they only knew the goal is to have the highest time in the quarter! Or at least that's what i tell my wife in golf... no, no sweetie, the more times you hit the ball the better. LOL
Old 03-06-2009 | 10:31 PM
  #64  
Formula350's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 7,564
Likes: 4
From: Decatur, TN (N-W of Athens)
Default

Originally Posted by RamAir95TA
Hmmm...that's funny. I switched from mids to long tubes in my bolt-on days and gained a full tenth.
I'm not taking sides, and would say this to who ever had said it. Just wanted to clarify that. Now, he's claiming the shorties are better than the rest for torque, not HP. So the reason for your time improvement would be due to the improved HP which is what you're primarily using on the track. The torque just gets you out of the hole, which I know you know.

Now the flip side of the coin is him trying to say that shorties rule for a stock, to nearly stock, LT1. Our LT1s are quite held back, but any vehicle that is able to breath better will benefit to some degree. Sometimes not, but that's a different discussion. Our LT1s gain a bit from shorties, but not enough to merit their cost. Mids are worth it, but I'd still be surprised if a fully stock LT1 wouldn't see more gains from LTs vs Mids (shorties aren't even worth mentioning).
Old 03-06-2009 | 10:44 PM
  #65  
myltwon's Avatar
TECH Addict

iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,965
Likes: 6
From: Palm Harbor, FL
Default

Originally Posted by FAcToRyFReaKeD
Im talking about stock to bolt on cars and nonsense that iv seen over and over and over and over again. I know shorties on bolt on cars run better for tq.. and if you dont like it then well yous got problems.
Old 03-06-2009 | 10:52 PM
  #66  
Formula350's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 7,564
Likes: 4
From: Decatur, TN (N-W of Athens)
Default

Since we're killing the thread, during a heated, even if slightly harsh, helpful debate. I should add my own creation.

Old 03-06-2009 | 11:04 PM
  #67  
the_merv's Avatar
11 Second Club
15 Year Member
iTrader: (88)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 19,896
Likes: 359
From: The Beach...
Default

^^Lol that's wrong..


LT's will out perform Shorties any time..hands down. The only time Shorty Headers out-do LT's is when the Shorties have a Turbo bolted to them.
They feel like they have more torque down low because in reality they keep the stock powerband in that area. The LT's move it up, so the torque is at a higher RPM, and a higher amount of torque as well.

In a way I guess a Shorty Vs. LT debate can be related to LT1 Vs. LS1 performance. The LS1 has more power, just at a higher RPM.
Old 03-06-2009 | 11:15 PM
  #68  
Elliott's94Z's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,370
Likes: 1
From: Oregon Grown
Default

Originally Posted by myltwon
Lol that's great.
Old 03-06-2009 | 11:20 PM
  #69  
ROWDYZ28's Avatar
Launching!
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
From: Henderson NV
Default

Originally Posted by FAcToRyFReaKeD
.. Iv always preferred !!Shorties!! to Longtubes on a !!stock-to-bolt on car!! Simple because its cleaner sounding and they just pour torque through 100mph like longtubes Never could! +1 for LT's though!.. your just not going to feel any real power diffrence with the LT's until 80mph+ Spend the money right once and get hooker's lt's
I AM SOFA KING RETARDED ,, I AM SOFA KING RETARDED.. put your head between your legs and say this real fast. Better yet, look into a mirror and say it
Old 03-06-2009 | 11:34 PM
  #70  
gregrob's Avatar
TECH Senior Member

iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 5,130
Likes: 4
From: 6,000+ feet
Default

Shorties might make torque earlier, but I don't buy that the make MORE than LTs.

I feel that for bolt on cars though, an 1 3/4 mid tube (such as the ASM headers which you can barely call a mid) is optimum. Some have changed from lts and true duals to the asm design and picked up significant power AND torque.
Old 03-06-2009 | 11:37 PM
  #71  
ROWDYZ28's Avatar
Launching!
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
From: Henderson NV
Default

Originally Posted by 94Z28-MSTGKLR
WOW! I was going to buy a set of pacesetters for my factory...stock (except GMMG) set up but I can see clearly now...I just need to stick with the factory manifolds because they are the bomb. I feel sorry for all the guys with LT's for all the money they have wasted. If they only knew the goal is to have the highest time in the quarter! Or at least that's what i tell my wife in golf... no, no sweetie, the more times you hit the ball the better. LOL
LOL the more you hit the ball the better...that's classic
Old 03-07-2009 | 09:28 AM
  #72  
whammer33024's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
From: clear lake, iowa
Default

the



Quick Reply: Bbk or pace



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:37 AM.