LT1-LT4 Modifications 1993-97 Gen II Small Block V8

stock manifold weight vs longtubes

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-08-2009 | 08:03 PM
  #1  
redt/a2000's Avatar
Thread Starter
On The Tree
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
Default stock manifold weight vs longtubes

Whats the weight difference, does anyone know.
Old 04-08-2009 | 08:17 PM
  #2  
RamAir95TA's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 9,467
Likes: 7
From: South Jersey
Default

Hmm...good question. I'd go with a 5 to 10 lb. weight savings.
Old 04-08-2009 | 10:58 PM
  #3  
camerory's Avatar
On The Tree
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
From: Little Rock, AR
Default

I just sold a set of stock manifolds and they weighted 28 lbs in the box. I would say longtubes would weight more because they have a good amount of tubing. Not sure the exact number though, you could try and contact a manufacturer. I have Mac Mid Tube headers and the headers+y-pipe were a lot lighter than the stock manifolds and y-pipe, I would say by about 15 lbs.
Old 04-08-2009 | 11:13 PM
  #4  
myltwon's Avatar
TECH Addict

iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,965
Likes: 6
From: Palm Harbor, FL
Default

well you have to imagine that manifolds are cast iron (I believe so) where as your average LT is made from steel of some grade. should be atleast a couple pounds weight savings like joe said
Old 04-08-2009 | 11:21 PM
  #5  
camerory's Avatar
On The Tree
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
From: Little Rock, AR
Default

Yes, the stock manifolds are cast iron. You might be right, everywhere on the internet is says performance exhaust saves weight over the cast manifolds but I would like to see if that is a correct statement for long tubes.
Old 04-08-2009 | 11:29 PM
  #6  
camerory's Avatar
On The Tree
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
From: Little Rock, AR
Default

Check this out:
http://www.randdspeed.com/index.php?...roducts_id=213
They say these long tubes weigh 10 lbs, I don't believe that because my Mac were heavier than that.

We will have to see if anyone wants to weight their long tubes before installing them to compare.
Old 04-08-2009 | 11:31 PM
  #7  
ls1adamls1's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast

iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 505
Likes: 0
From: san jose, ca
Default

my lt's weighted only 10 lbs they are stainless steel.
Old 04-08-2009 | 11:34 PM
  #8  
camerory's Avatar
On The Tree
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
From: Little Rock, AR
Default

Wow, that is almost a 20 lb reduction then. I learned something
Old 04-08-2009 | 11:48 PM
  #9  
za355tx's Avatar
TECH Resident
iTrader: (108)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 982
Likes: 1
From: Dfw
Default

I read that the stock manifolds weigh 13 lbs each. My LPP longtubes weigh 14 lbs each.
Old 04-09-2009 | 07:55 AM
  #10  
creepingdeath94's Avatar
TECH Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 399
Likes: 0
From: PSL, FL
Default

Yea, the LT set i got was 10 lbs also and they are stainless as well. I would say that the stock manifold alone weighs about the same...maybe a little more than the entire long tube manifold. And that doesn't include the whole blob of weight in the collector and stock y-pipe. I would say at least 10 lbs.
Old 04-09-2009 | 08:07 AM
  #11  
deelong4002's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 724
Likes: 0
From: Stockbridge, MI
Default

If LT1 manifolds are anything like LS1 manifolds, i would guess a good 5-10lb weight savings with LT's. I wish i had weighed them cause i just had both of them next to one another, but those manifolds were heavier than hell for their size. They are really thick as well, where long tubes are relatively thin comparitively



Quick Reply: stock manifold weight vs longtubes



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:45 AM.