LT1-LT4 Modifications 1993-97 Gen II Small Block V8

LT1 Rotating Assembly Questions

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 8, 2009 | 09:52 PM
  #1  
afterburner82's Avatar
Thread Starter
On The Tree
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
From: Grove City, OH
Default LT1 Rotating Assembly Questions

Hey everyone. Going to a swap meet this weekend and was looking for a sweet deal on a rotating assembly. I know I need a 1pc. rear main but still had questions. My plan is a N/A 383 with AI/LE heads. Cam is undetermined, however I don't have to pass emissions:

1. Are there any setups I should avoid?

2. Will most if not all 1 pc. rear main setups work for SBC in an LT1?

3. Not looking for ridiculous power so I am open as to cast versus forged on the crank. Obviously would like forged, but if I am only making 400 - 450HP after the setup, I think, from my readings on here, a cast crank would be OK, yes?

4.Regardless of cast/forged crank, a good set of forged rods and pistons might be best. Should I be concerned with H-beam versus I-beam rods?

Please ask any questions so I can get the best answer possible. Thanks again, everyone!
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2009 | 10:51 PM
  #2  
BIG PURPLE's Avatar
On The Tree
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
From: baton rouge, la
Default

its a lot to list shoot me a pm with your #
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2009 | 04:12 AM
  #3  
RamAir95TA's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 9,467
Likes: 8
From: South Jersey
Default

Originally Posted by afterburner82
Hey everyone. Going to a swap meet this weekend and was looking for a sweet deal on a rotating assembly. I know I need a 1pc. rear main but still had questions. My plan is a N/A 383 with AI/LE heads. Cam is undetermined, however I don't have to pass emissions:

1. Are there any setups I should avoid?

2. Will most if not all 1 pc. rear main setups work for SBC in an LT1?

3. Not looking for ridiculous power so I am open as to cast versus forged on the crank. Obviously would like forged, but if I am only making 400 - 450HP after the setup, I think, from my readings on here, a cast crank would be OK, yes?

4.Regardless of cast/forged crank, a good set of forged rods and pistons might be best. Should I be concerned with H-beam versus I-beam rods?

Please ask any questions so I can get the best answer possible. Thanks again, everyone!
1.) Avoid Eagle/Scat cast crankshafts/components at all cost. There have been way too many failures lately.

2.) Any 1 pc. rear main SBC crankshaft/piston/CR will work.

3.) IMO, if you're using anything other than the stock crankshaft, go with a forged piece. The rotating assembly should be able to handle 150% as much as you plan to throw at it for reliability's sake.

4.) H-beams are always nice, but not a necessity at your desired power level. I'm using Scat forged I-beams. Definitely go with a forged piston mated to a 6" rod.
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2009 | 10:42 AM
  #4  
99blancoSS's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (115)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 9,892
Likes: 3
From: ST Helens, OR
Default

I can set you up for around $17XX or a couple hundred more for Callies
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2009 | 11:03 AM
  #5  
sweetbmxrider's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,768
Likes: 3
From: jersey shore
Default

Originally Posted by 99blancoSS
I can set you up for around $17XX or a couple hundred more for Callies
more info? in the market here for an lt1 383 forged rotating assembly. looking for some numbers to crunch
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2009 | 11:32 AM
  #6  
99blancoSS's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (115)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 9,892
Likes: 3
From: ST Helens, OR
Default

Did you want Eagle, Scat or Callies ? Scat and Eagle are less money and what size combustion chambers and what heads?
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2009 | 08:42 PM
  #7  
Corey @ Clayton Racing's Avatar
FormerVendor
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
From: Bartlett
Default

go with forged components, or you will wish you did later. We have both Scat and Compstar assemblies in stock, with your choice of MAHLE or SRP pistons
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2009 | 11:02 PM
  #8  
93Z2871805's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
Veteran: Air Force
15 Year Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,736
Likes: 50
Default

I can recommend Ohio for forged crank and rods, Keith Black Forged aluminum pistons. I'd stick with 5.7 rods because of how far the wrist pin moves up and starts encroaching on the oil ring land. I set up my 383 all forged bottom end with balancing, billet splayed caps, rings and clevite 77 bearings for $1562.00.
Reply
LS1 Tech Stories

The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time

story-0

Topdon ONE vs. Artidiag 800 BT2: Which is the Diagnostic Tablet For You?

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-1

Gas Monkey Built a 6-Wheel Ferrari Testarossa With a Corvette LT4 Engine

 Verdad Gallardo
story-2

7 Most Reliable High-Performance Engines GM Has Ever Built

 Verdad Gallardo
story-3

Amazing '71 Camaro Restomod Is Modern Muscle Car Under the Skin

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

6 Common C5 Corvette Failures and What's Involved In Repairing Them

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-5

Retro Modern Bandit Pontiac Trans AM Comes With Burt Reynolds' Autograph

 Verdad Gallardo
story-6

Top 10 Greatest Cadillac V Series Performance Models Ever, Ranked

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-7

Top 10 Most Powerful Chevy Trucks Ever Made!

 
story-8

Hennessey's New Supercharged Silverado ZR2 Has 700 HP

 Verdad Gallardo
story-9

Coachbuilt N2A Anteros Is an LS2-Powered C6 Corvette In Italian Clothes

 Verdad Gallardo
Old Sep 11, 2009 | 08:18 PM
  #9  
afterburner82's Avatar
Thread Starter
On The Tree
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
From: Grove City, OH
Default

I guess I am feeling a little overwhelmed with information in trying to research this setup. I guess I would love to have a NA 383 with a set of TFS heads from AI and a cam with a rough idle and keep the compression to where I can still run pump gas (93 octane). Whatever the car makes in HP it makes, however, it needs to be more streetable than track only. I do not need to pass emissions where I am.

I would like to keep the build under $7K. I guess my questions now would be:

1. Can I buy a rotating assembly without knowing the full specs of the heads I am using? In other words, can I get the heads milled appropriately to achieve the compression ratio I want based on the piston specs?

2. I saw someone posted on here they had a 383 with 5.7" rods. I thought 383's were a 400 crank with 6" rods?

3. Is 12:1 compression reasonable on pump gas given a good dynotune? If I wanted more umph afterwards, could I give it a small shot of N2O or a small supercharger < 6lbs? (I know the SC would blow the 7K buildout of the water)


Sorry I seem a little lost in all this now.

Last edited by afterburner82; Sep 11, 2009 at 08:19 PM. Reason: One additonal comment.
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2009 | 08:41 PM
  #10  
RamAir95TA's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 9,467
Likes: 8
From: South Jersey
Default

Originally Posted by afterburner82
I guess I am feeling a little overwhelmed with information in trying to research this setup. I guess I would love to have a NA 383 with a set of TFS heads from AI and a cam with a rough idle and keep the compression to where I can still run pump gas (93 octane). Whatever the car makes in HP it makes, however, it needs to be more streetable than track only. I do not need to pass emissions where I am.

I would like to keep the build under $7K. I guess my questions now would be:

1. Can I buy a rotating assembly without knowing the full specs of the heads I am using? In other words, can I get the heads milled appropriately to achieve the compression ratio I want based on the piston specs?

2. I saw someone posted on here they had a 383 with 5.7" rods. I thought 383's were a 400 crank with 6" rods?

3. Is 12:1 compression reasonable on pump gas given a good dynotune? If I wanted more umph afterwards, could I give it a small shot of N2O or a small supercharger < 6lbs? (I know the SC would blow the 7K buildout of the water)


Sorry I seem a little lost in all this now.
You sound like you're looking for a setup very similar to mine.

Forged Ohio crankshaft
Forged Scat I-beam 6" rods
Forged SRP -5cc pistons
Decked block, zero deck height
4-bolt main (2-bolt would be fine as well)
AI 200cc heads/cam package (52cc chambers)
.026" head gaskets

This results in a SCR of 12.4:1 (DCR of 9.1:1). I run a mail-order tune from PCMforless (no dyno-tuning yet). Haven't been to the dyno just yet, but it runs what it does with no KR.

If you have all forged components, spray away! Remember, nitrous loves compression. I plan on a 200+ shot in the near future.

My engine ended up being around $8500, somewhere around there.
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2009 | 08:48 PM
  #11  
afterburner82's Avatar
Thread Starter
On The Tree
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
From: Grove City, OH
Default

Originally Posted by RamAir95TA
You sound like you're looking for a setup very similar to mine.

Forged Ohio crankshaft
Forged Scat I-beam 6" rods
Forged SRP -5cc pistons
Decked block, zero deck height
4-bolt main (2-bolt would be fine as well)
AI 200cc heads/cam package (52cc chambers)
.026" head gaskets

This results in a SCR of 12.4:1 (DCR of 9.1:1). I run a mail-order tune from PCMforless (no dyno-tuning yet). Haven't been to the dyno just yet, but it runs what it does with no KR.

If you have all forged components, spray away! Remember, nitrous loves compression. I plan on a 200+ shot in the near future.

My engine ended up being around $8500, somewhere around there.


Did you have to do any clearancing for valves?
Reply
Old Sep 12, 2009 | 12:29 PM
  #12  
Corey @ Clayton Racing's Avatar
FormerVendor
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
From: Bartlett
Default

I would run a 6" or 6.125" rod. Scat Procomp I beam with the 7/16 arp hardware would work, but a good h beam isn't that much more.

Last edited by Corey @ Clayton Racing; Sep 12, 2009 at 12:47 PM.
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2009 | 03:40 PM
  #13  
93Z2871805's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
Veteran: Air Force
15 Year Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,736
Likes: 50
Default

The reason some choose 5.7in rods over 6 is because they want a little more stability. I was going to go with a 6 but I did a little bit of homework and decided I didn't want to chance comprimising the rod with flexing. Too short is just as dangerous as too long though. When you make the rod longer you give a more desirable angle for the rod to go up the bore and not as much thrust on the side of the piston. However that means you have to move the wristpin closer to the oil ring and you start to encroach on the cam. 5.56 rods like in the 400 didn't favor high revs at all and are a grenade waiting to happen. I chose 5.7 because it was the in between for 5.56 and 6.0 and I think GM got it right with that length, it also still give's me plenty of room to run my forged h-beams and have plenty clearance for any cam I choose. As for building the motor and then thinking of the heads later, you should have it planned out first and piece everything together as time/money permits. I've watched plenty of people throw the best components at stuff blindly without thinking of combination and end up with a really poor running motor. I shot for a 11:1 cr with a 62cc chamber (TFS 195 GenX) and with the 5.7 rod 3.75 stroke and +6.40cc piston (Flat top) I got an 11.07:1 CR. I planned for a lower compression ratio than most people are running because I'm planning on this car being a driver without 104+ octane, and I'm also going to shoot it with 2 stages of 150+. But 90% of LT1 heads save for the TFS' wont work with my setup because of the smaller chamber sizes that are typically around 54-52cc and would blow my CR through the roof, I know this but I planned it specifically for the TFS GenX Heads only.
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2009 | 08:17 PM
  #14  
RamAir95TA's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 9,467
Likes: 8
From: South Jersey
Default

Originally Posted by 93Z2871805
The reason some choose 5.7in rods over 6 is because they want a little more stability. I was going to go with a 6 but I did a little bit of homework and decided I didn't want to chance comprimising the rod with flexing. Too short is just as dangerous as too long though. When you make the rod longer you give a more desirable angle for the rod to go up the bore and not as much thrust on the side of the piston. However that means you have to move the wristpin closer to the oil ring and you start to encroach on the cam. 5.56 rods like in the 400 didn't favor high revs at all and are a grenade waiting to happen. I chose 5.7 because it was the in between for 5.56 and 6.0 and I think GM got it right with that length, it also still give's me plenty of room to run my forged h-beams and have plenty clearance for any cam I choose. As for building the motor and then thinking of the heads later, you should have it planned out first and piece everything together as time/money permits. I've watched plenty of people throw the best components at stuff blindly without thinking of combination and end up with a really poor running motor. I shot for a 11:1 cr with a 62cc chamber (TFS 195 GenX) and with the 5.7 rod 3.75 stroke and +6.40cc piston (Flat top) I got an 11.07:1 CR. I planned for a lower compression ratio than most people are running because I'm planning on this car being a driver without 104+ octane, and I'm also going to shoot it with 2 stages of 150+. But 90% of LT1 heads save for the TFS' wont work with my setup because of the smaller chamber sizes that are typically around 54-52cc and would blow my CR through the roof, I know this but I planned it specifically for the TFS GenX Heads only.
You know nitrous responds better to higher compression, right?

Static compression is just that, a static figure, and has no bearing on engine performance (dynamic compression is the more important figure). On a good tune, running 9.1:1 DCR on 93 octane is easily doable.

6" rods offer too many advantages over their 5.7" counterparts when set up and clearanced correctly, IMO.
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2009 | 05:53 AM
  #15  
skinnies's Avatar
10 Second Club
20 Year Member
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,431
Likes: 4
From: KS
Default

Originally Posted by RamAir95TA
You sound like you're looking for a setup very similar to mine.

Forged Ohio crankshaft
Forged Scat I-beam 6" rods
Forged SRP -5cc pistons
Decked block, zero deck height
4-bolt main (2-bolt would be fine as well)
AI 200cc heads/cam package (52cc chambers)
.026" head gaskets

This results in a SCR of 12.4:1 (DCR of 9.1:1). I run a mail-order tune from PCMforless (no dyno-tuning yet). Haven't been to the dyno just yet, but it runs what it does with no KR.

If you have all forged components, spray away! Remember, nitrous loves compression. I plan on a 200+ shot in the near future.

My engine ended up being around $8500, somewhere around there.
Just curious why you went with an srp piston, which are known to be softer and not like nitrous?
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2009 | 03:16 PM
  #16  
RamAir95TA's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 9,467
Likes: 8
From: South Jersey
Default

Originally Posted by skinnies
Just curious why you went with an srp piston, which are known to be softer and not like nitrous?
Because I've never heard your claim before to be honest.

Reply
Old Sep 15, 2009 | 08:02 PM
  #17  
myltwon's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,965
Likes: 7
From: Palm Harbor, FL
Default

here's what I'm running

http://www.eaglerod.com/index.php?op...d=34&Itemid=41

I make a little under 400rwhp through an auto with no problems. not exactly a RA I'd trust to high rpm or nitrous though especially with the eagle balance in it. my setup stops making power around 6k rpm so this isn't an issue for me.

I kinda wish I would've went forged with a good balance so I could bottle it and rev it higher without worry, but this was my first motor build that I'd ever put together and I wasn't about to put a $2k+ rotating assembly in a motor I wasn't even sure would last. so oh well live and learn but I had no idea I'd do everything right
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2009 | 07:20 PM
  #18  
93Z2871805's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
Veteran: Air Force
15 Year Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,736
Likes: 50
Default

With the cam I'm running and my rod length my dynamic was 10.173 according to keith black (United Engine and Machine) calculator (I did the calculation with what I remember off the top of my head, when I did it the last time with all my specs sitting in front of me I got 9.9:1DCR). And I'm not running gapless rings. Don't get me wrong, the 6in is a great rod length. I just prefer the 5.7 rod being that the chance for rod flex is smaller (not that I'm too worried about it), clearance for larger cams, and I don't have to push the wrist pin higher. Once again it's a preference.

Last edited by 93Z2871805; Sep 16, 2009 at 07:36 PM.
Reply




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:42 PM.

story-0
Topdon ONE vs. Artidiag 800 BT2: Which is the Diagnostic Tablet For You?

Slideshow: We take a close look at the ONE and Artidiag 800BT2 diagnostic tools from Topdon and the reasons to buy one over the other.

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-05-28 11:05:11


VIEW MORE
story-1
Gas Monkey Built a 6-Wheel Ferrari Testarossa With a Corvette LT4 Engine

Slideshow: The controversial Ferrari F6 swaps its original flat-12 for a Corvette Z06-derived LT4 V8 and sends power to four rear wheels through a custom-built drivetrain.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-26 18:23:54


VIEW MORE
story-2
7 Most Reliable High-Performance Engines GM Has Ever Built

Slideshow:These GM engines didn't just make huge power, they survived abuse, boost, track days, and six-digit mileage with a reputation for refusing to quit.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-21 16:45:27


VIEW MORE
story-3
Amazing '71 Camaro Restomod Is Modern Muscle Car Under the Skin

Slideshow: This heavily modified 1971 Camaro mixes classic muscle car styling with a fifth-generation Camaro interior and modern LS3 power.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:06:42


VIEW MORE
story-4
6 Common C5 Corvette Failures and What's Involved In Repairing Them

Slideshow: From wobbling harmonic balancers to failed EBCMs, these are the issues that define long-term C5 ownership and what repairs typically involve.

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-05-07 18:44:57


VIEW MORE
story-5
Retro Modern Bandit Pontiac Trans AM Comes With Burt Reynolds' Autograph

Slideshow: A modern Camaro transformed into a retro icon, this limited-run "Bandit" build blends nostalgia with brute force in a way few revivals manage.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-21 13:57:02


VIEW MORE
story-6
Top 10 Greatest Cadillac V Series Performance Models Ever, Ranked

Slideshow: Cadillac didn't just crash the high-performance luxury vehicle party, it showed up loud, supercharged, and occasionally a little unhinged...

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-04-16 10:05:15


VIEW MORE
story-7
Top 10 Most Powerful Chevy Trucks Ever Made!

Slideshow: Top ten most powerful Chevy trucks ever made

By | 2026-03-25 09:22:26


VIEW MORE
story-8
Hennessey's New Supercharged Silverado ZR2 Has 700 HP

Slideshow: Hennessey has turned the Silverado ZR2 into a 700-hp off-road monster with supercharged V8 power and a limited production run.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-03-24 18:57:52


VIEW MORE
story-9
Coachbuilt N2A Anteros Is an LS2-Powered C6 Corvette In Italian Clothes

Slideshow: A one-off sports car that looks like a vintage Italian exotic-but hides a C6 Corvette underneath-just sold for the price of a new mid-engine Corvette.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-03-23 18:53:41


VIEW MORE