cam only 11 sec LT1s

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Oct 14, 2009 | 02:02 PM

#41

CamaroRacing12

11 Second Club

iTrader: (5)

Joined: Apr 2007

Posts: 3,779

Likes: 3

From: Haverhill, Mass

Quote:

Originally Posted by tbird31

Buddy of mine, 95 Z28, A4 w/ Yank 4000 stall(was a M6), full bolt ons and cam only, ran a:

12.23 @ 111 on a 1.69 60ft. With a DA of 1100.

Hasn't really run the quarter again since that run but he's cutting consistant 1.5x's on his new MTs.

BTW, this is a light diet car(!rear seat, !AC, !sway bar) and his suspension is BONE *** STOCK. Stock everything. Seriously the car just rolls.

yea man i dn thats very stout times but not crazy impressive. i run low 12.40's and im bolton only. bone stock suspension, bone stock gears. 109mph. agian def stout times. but nothing crazy impressive. if i was gonna do a cam only car i would make sure it ran in the 11's

Oct 14, 2009 | 02:05 PM

#42

buzz12586

TECH Enthusiast

iTrader: (17)

Joined: Feb 2006

Posts: 731

Likes: 0

From: Charlotte, NC

Quote:

Originally Posted by CamaroRacing12

He was talking about my car. Like I said early it went 12.08 @ 112 in 2700' DA. November 4th is the next chance I will have at a 1/4mi track and I hope to see some low 11.90's out of it. The car weighs 3500lbs with me in it, far from a light weight.

Oct 14, 2009 | 02:09 PM

#43

CamaroRacing12

11 Second Club

iTrader: (5)

Joined: Apr 2007

Posts: 3,779

Likes: 3

From: Haverhill, Mass

oh i was unaware he was talking about ur car buzz. now those times are more what i was thinking for impressive cam only times lol. he said 12.20's lol

a high 11 sec cam only pretty much full weight car is def good stuff

Oct 14, 2009 | 02:18 PM

#44

buzz12586

TECH Enthusiast

iTrader: (17)

Joined: Feb 2006

Posts: 731

Likes: 0

From: Charlotte, NC

Yea it does alright for a cc503 cam. Should be going to 3.73s in an S60 this winter. Hopefully that will pick it up some.

Oct 14, 2009 | 07:22 PM

#45

CamaroRacing12

11 Second Club

iTrader: (5)

Joined: Apr 2007

Posts: 3,779

Likes: 3

From: Haverhill, Mass

nice. im thinking about doing a cam only setup soon too. but im not sure. i got a few different directions i can go after doing just bolt on's i really want to break into the 11's bolt on only b4 i do anything else.

Oct 14, 2009 | 09:28 PM

#46

wht97ws6ta

TECH Apprentice

Joined: Dec 2008

Posts: 372

Likes: 1

From: Kinston North Carolina

Dang maybe the 12.70s i had in mind with the cc503, ported intake and stock stall with 4.10s is a lil conservative. The car runs 13.0s with bolt ons and street tires. I wish it would run some mid 12s when i get it back together. I know it would with a stall.

Oct 14, 2009 | 09:31 PM

#47

buta

Teching In

iTrader: (2)

Joined: Mar 2008

Posts: 29

Likes: 0

Quote:

7. Change your intake for the 1996-97 intake (12552138).

Just wondering what makes the 96-97 intake better than the earlier years???

Oct 14, 2009 | 09:42 PM

#48

duh

TECH Fanatic

iTrader: (16)

Joined: Apr 2009

Posts: 1,501

Likes: 2

From: burbs of chi-town

Quote:

Originally Posted by GIZMO

19. I have always had better results with smaller injectors than the experts tell me to run. My Firebird runs 6.50's in the 1/8th in decent air with 24 lb injectors. Our stock internals project picked-up when we switched to 19 lb injectors at 50 PSI!

The reason the 19lb SVO's pick up some is that ford injectors are actually rated at a lower psi.....35 as opposed to 45 IIRC....That way when you put them into a stock GM fuel system they're actually putting out more than the rated 19 LB/HR. A lot of guys can go to the 24 SVO's and run wilder than the stock GM 24 lbers.....The real fun comes when you get into the bigger numbers and jack the hell out of the pressure.....

This was more meant more as useless info than anything else......