got my first kill in the Z28 tonight!
12-27-2009, 09:19 PM
#21
TECH Addict
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: toronto ontario canada
Posts: 2,047
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
putting down power in a f body is much easier then in a stang
yes a properly tuned 4.6 4v will beat an bad running un tuned ls1 anyday
show me a stock cube na 4v 4.6 in the 500whp range
i can show you plenty ls1's
yes a properly tuned 4.6 4v will beat an bad running un tuned ls1 anyday
show me a stock cube na 4v 4.6 in the 500whp range
i can show you plenty ls1's
12-27-2009, 09:27 PM
#22
Teching In
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Home, work , who cares
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
also i am not bias as i believe the lsx , ltx , and modular motors are all good platforms.
12-27-2009, 09:37 PM
#23
As long as it beats it, that is all that matters..
Who gives a ****, since when is a power adder not allowed?
You whiny little bitches that say "if it is NA" "without the supercharger it isn't ****" "blah blah blah... Take you damn tampons out and grow up. If a car is faster, its faster, regardless of what it has.
If you want to play that game.. A NA 4.6 "ls1" would get walked on by a NA 4.6 GT.
You whiny little bitches that say "if it is NA" "without the supercharger it isn't ****" "blah blah blah... Take you damn tampons out and grow up. If a car is faster, its faster, regardless of what it has.
If you want to play that game.. A NA 4.6 "ls1" would get walked on by a NA 4.6 GT.
12-27-2009, 09:49 PM
#24
10 Second Club
As long as it beats it, that is all that matters..
Who gives a ****, since when is a power adder not allowed?
You whiny little bitches that say "if it is NA" "without the supercharger it isn't ****" "blah blah blah... Take you damn tampons out and grow up. If a car is faster, its faster, regardless of what it has.
If you want to play that game.. A NA 4.6 "ls1" would get walked on by a NA 4.6 GT.
Who gives a ****, since when is a power adder not allowed?
You whiny little bitches that say "if it is NA" "without the supercharger it isn't ****" "blah blah blah... Take you damn tampons out and grow up. If a car is faster, its faster, regardless of what it has.
If you want to play that game.. A NA 4.6 "ls1" would get walked on by a NA 4.6 GT.
match that with a car of identical weight and it seems even-steven
12-27-2009, 09:53 PM
#25
tough to say. in current form the 4.8 puts out 302hp and 305 ft\lbs of torque. and thats just a truck engine. a little more compression and a bit healthier cam easily puts it in the range of the current 4.6 hp, 315 and 325 ft\lbs of torque.
match that with a car of identical weight and it seems even-steven
match that with a car of identical weight and it seems even-steven
I'm not sure exactly what it would be because it isn't real.. But I would guess it would only be making around 250Hp.. You have to think, the 5.7 was only doing around 340.. I no doubt think it would be a half way decent race, but I think the GT with same cubes would be on top.
12-27-2009, 10:00 PM
#26
10 Second Club
But go back to whatever year these GTs are being made.. Lets say 2000?
I'm not sure exactly what it would be because it isn't real.. But I would guess it would only be making around 250Hp.. You have to think, the 5.7 was only doing around 340.. I no doubt think it would be a half way decent race, but I think the GT with same cubes would be on top.
I'm not sure exactly what it would be because it isn't real.. But I would guess it would only be making around 250Hp.. You have to think, the 5.7 was only doing around 340.. I no doubt think it would be a half way decent race, but I think the GT with same cubes would be on top.
but if you include 4v's of that era they obviously had the advantage
12-27-2009, 10:09 PM
#27
Launching!
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Port Charlotte, FL
Posts: 262
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
There you go with POTENTIAL.
Like I said, I'm not arguing about which motor has the best all out potential.
But an F body putting it down better? Maybe a stalled auto car. But when comaring apples to apples, a well set up m6 f body, vs a properly geared modular is going to have a hard time from a dig.
But screw all the bench racing, the **** gets old....
You win, an ls1 will beat a modular car, any time, any situation, any driver, any conditions....happy?
Anyone want to race a stock longblock 4.6
And look at what this turned into, a modular vs ls1 debate.......In the LT1 section
Gotta love it! 
12-27-2009, 10:28 PM
#30
i'm also talking about the era of 1993-2002.... the only thing the mustang had to really compete with from '03till this year was the vette and we all know the stang GT stock can't beat a base line vette..... as far as cobra's, they still needed a blower to beat the all motor GM platforms and compete with the vette
12-27-2009, 10:53 PM
#31
i'm also talking about the era of 1993-2002.... the only thing the mustang had to really compete with from '03till this year was the vette and we all know the stang GT stock can't beat a base line vette..... as far as cobra's, they still needed a blower to beat the all motor GM platforms and compete with the vette
12-27-2009, 10:59 PM
#32
TECH Addict
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: toronto ontario canada
Posts: 2,047
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
There you go with POTENTIAL.
Like I said, I'm not arguing about which motor has the best all out potential.
But an F body putting it down better? Maybe a stalled auto car. But when comaring apples to apples, a well set up m6 f body, vs a properly geared modular is going to have a hard time from a dig.
But screw all the bench racing, the **** gets old....
You win, an ls1 will beat a modular car, any time, any situation, any driver, any conditions....happy?
Anyone want to race a stock longblock 4.6
And look at what this turned into, a modular vs ls1 debate.......In the LT1 section Gotta love it!
Like I said, I'm not arguing about which motor has the best all out potential.
But an F body putting it down better? Maybe a stalled auto car. But when comaring apples to apples, a well set up m6 f body, vs a properly geared modular is going to have a hard time from a dig.
But screw all the bench racing, the **** gets old....
You win, an ls1 will beat a modular car, any time, any situation, any driver, any conditions....happy?
Anyone want to race a stock longblock 4.6
And look at what this turned into, a modular vs ls1 debate.......In the LT1 section
Gotta love it!yea i got a turbo 347
anyway, i did not intend to start a pissing match
i would love to say let's get back on topic, but i think it is too late for that
12-27-2009, 11:09 PM
#33
As long as it beats it, that is all that matters..
Who gives a ****, since when is a power adder not allowed?
You whiny little bitches that say "if it is NA" "without the supercharger it isn't ****" "blah blah blah... Take you damn tampons out and grow up. If a car is faster, its faster, regardless of what it has.
If you want to play that game.. A NA 4.6 "ls1" would get walked on by a NA 4.6 GT.
Who gives a ****, since when is a power adder not allowed?
You whiny little bitches that say "if it is NA" "without the supercharger it isn't ****" "blah blah blah... Take you damn tampons out and grow up. If a car is faster, its faster, regardless of what it has.
If you want to play that game.. A NA 4.6 "ls1" would get walked on by a NA 4.6 GT.
, but good kill!
12-28-2009, 05:46 AM
#40
Teching In
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Home, work , who cares
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts