cc306 and trickflow heads
Thanks in advance
Jim
Trending Topics
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
TFS heads and a cc306 will demand some good rpm which will be pushing it for a stock bottom end. Sticking in a cam that is already larger than a large cc306 is just a terrible idea with a stock bottom end unless the person was willing to undershift the hell out of it like your setup. That is what gives us LT1's a bad name, when someone over cams their car and revs it to where they would with the stock cam or baby Crane 227 aka it runs like **** when it sounds like a racecar. Just sad how some people on here think more cam is better and makes a car faster, truly sad.
The 306 and those heads should make for some decent power, haven't seen any results but I would imagine around 400+rwhp in a manual.
Last edited by StealthFormula; Dec 29, 2009 at 04:57 PM.
Thanks in advance
Jim
21 degree TFS heads and a cc306 will easily make 400+rwhp in an M6 with full bolt-ons. A full bolt-on GM847 or XFI292 car with stock heads is going to make 360-370rwhp in an M6 on average.
Last edited by slomarao; Dec 30, 2009 at 08:45 AM.
I spent close to $1800.00 building up my stock heads including all the hardware (putting on fire-retardant underwear now). The flow numbers are great, but I might have done better starting from some well-built aftermarket heads with the valve size I wanted, and added springs, 7/16" studs, 1.6RRs, etc. after a good hand porting. I really learned my lesson building these stock heads up. They go really well with my cc503, a small step up, but very close to the 306's numbers. I'm hitting 377RWHP just shy of 6,000 with a nice plateau out to 6,500. Steve Ashworth in Fuquay, NC did the porting and did a hell of a good job with what I gave him. You can't make chicken salad out of chicken sh*t. HOWEVER, I think I might have done better if I'd planned better with the heads as the starting point for my power plans and measure that against my driveability goals. Absolutely agree 100% with StealthFormula about bigger cams not equaling better performance...
My bottom end is stock, but I did go through it completely and found some unpleasant things with the crank bearings (65k orig. miles on '94 motor), so I had new bearings put in / line honed, etc. for tight tolerances and to avoid oiling problems. I'm not gonna take this car to the track; that was never my plan. Hypereutectic pistons are brittle and don't tolerate a lot of time above 6,800 or detonation before they come apart.
I could have made a little more power if I had planned better with the heads and been willing to spend more, but I still have a hell of a fast ride that's very streetable. Next build, I'll plan starting with the heads and have a custom grind cam. My .02...





