Is It Even POSSIBLE To Install Hooker Shorties???


SLPs 16 hrs start to finish
Jet Hots,Pace Setter,LPP 8 hrs
Hooker,Mac,Pace shorties 6hrs
Trending Topics
Hooker 96 LT1
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
I give up for now. Just left those two out and the others are just started in the holes good. Moving on to the passenger side now. Need to feel like I made some progress before I go to bed.
I had to grind the crap out of that wrench. It looked like a tuning fork by the time it was done.
Funny thing is it was an autozone wrench, and it lasted like 3 years after that. Even with putting cheater bars on it and such.

The only other way to do it might be to get stage 8s, since you can turn them with a hex key..... but to hell with trying to put those clips on, especially with shorties.

I read threads all the time where people claim that longtubes are soooo much better than shorties, but no one can ever prove it. But I have seen proof to the contrary.
I saw a site that showed dyno graphs of the same engine with shorties and with long tubes. The engine had a similar power band as the LT1's but it did not specify the engine or the brand(s) of headers. Out of a peak hp of around 400, the long tubes had less than a 10 hp advantage in the upper rpm range, and the shorties had the same advantage at a lower rpm. Nowhere in the range did one have a big advantage over the other.
I did see one guy claiming he had proof that his lt's had over a 20hp advantage over his shorties, and put up dynos. But he finally admitted that he also installed 1.6 rr's during the same time as the lt's.
My theory is that the shorties started falling out of favor with the fbody crowd after the LS1 came around. The LS1 has better factory exhaust than the LT1, so shorties don't do as much for it. Plus the LT1 makes it's best power in the upper rpm's, where the stock exhaust is more restrictive but lt's work best.
Either way, I have personally seen an LT1 gain 23 on the dyno with shorties and dual cats before a tune. I'll be happy with that.
I read threads all the time where people claim that longtubes are soooo much better than shorties, but no one can ever prove it. But I have seen proof to the contrary.
I saw a site that showed dyno graphs of the same engine with shorties and with long tubes. The engine had a similar power band as the LT1's but it did not specify the engine or the brand(s) of headers. Out of a peak hp of around 400, the long tubes had less than a 10 hp advantage in the upper rpm range, and the shorties had the same advantage at a lower rpm. Nowhere in the range did one have a big advantage over the other.
I did see one guy claiming he had proof that his lt's had over a 20hp advantage over his shorties, and put up dynos. But he finally admitted that he also installed 1.6 rr's during the same time as the lt's.
My theory is that the shorties started falling out of favor with the fbody crowd after the LS1 came around. The LS1 has better factory exhaust than the LT1, so shorties don't do as much for it. Plus the LT1 makes it's best power in the upper rpm's, where the stock exhaust is more restrictive but lt's work best.
Either way, I have personally seen an LT1 gain 23 on the dyno with shorties and dual cats before a tune. I'll be happy with that.
Plus if your car is supercharged one day the longtubes are probably likely to give a significant bump over shorties (low compression = harder for the engine to push exhaust out).









