LT1-LT4 Modifications 1993-97 Gen II Small Block V8

Another Cam Only Dyno Result

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-23-2010, 12:07 PM
  #1  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
Spiers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: St Joseph, MO
Posts: 739
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Another Cam Only Dyno Result

96 WS6 M6, Comp Cam 230/236 112, 1.6rr, Patriot gold dual springs, Pacesetter LT, 2.5" Ypipe open, free mods. Everything else is stock. Mail order tune from Madtuner. What do you guys think...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RbMqiLUOWIM


Last edited by Spiers; 05-23-2010 at 12:17 PM.
Old 05-23-2010, 12:10 PM
  #2  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
RamAir95TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 9,467
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Nice numbers for cam-only. What's it run at the track?
Old 05-23-2010, 01:30 PM
  #3  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
Spiers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: St Joseph, MO
Posts: 739
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Waiting on gears and a tire for that. Still have stock gears...will be doing SVO #30's and an EWP, a 8.8 with 4.10's and a drag radial...hopefully by the end of the summer. Full weight 3550 without driver.

But it did run 13.0 @110 with a 2.2 60ft ....
Old 05-23-2010, 01:36 PM
  #4  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (34)
 
SoxXpupPeT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Yonkers, NY
Posts: 3,432
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by Spiers
Waiting on gears and a tire for that. Still have stock gears...will be doing SVO #30's and an EWP, a 8.8 with 4.10's and a drag radial...hopefully by the end of the summer. Full weight 3550 without driver.

But it did run 13.0 @110 with a 2.2 60ft ....
thats damn impressive for a cam only + bolt ons...
Old 05-23-2010, 01:45 PM
  #5  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (12)
 
WhitePhoenix99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Indiana
Posts: 495
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Spiers
Waiting on gears and a tire for that. Still have stock gears...will be doing SVO #30's and an EWP, a 8.8 with 4.10's and a drag radial...hopefully by the end of the summer. Full weight 3550 without driver.

But it did run 13.0 @110 with a 2.2 60ft ....
Damn 13.0 @110 with a 2.2 60'?? Nitrous? lol

I've been looking for numbers for this cam, sounds like a strong runner. How's the driveability?
Old 05-23-2010, 02:43 PM
  #6  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
 
carlos64030's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,307
Received 10 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Cam only?!?!?! Wow... those are some impressive numbers for so little done. I plan on going with the same cam pretty much, but I have AFR LT4 competition ported heads.
Old 05-23-2010, 03:43 PM
  #7  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
 
SpeedDensityZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Macclenny FL
Posts: 852
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Looks like the tune is pretty good, I wouldn't mess with the injectors unless you have the fuel pressure jacked way up to get it run right. Save the money for mods somewhere else.
Old 05-23-2010, 03:47 PM
  #8  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
SS MPSTR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,510
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Your car obviously responded very well to what you've done. Nice.
Old 05-23-2010, 04:48 PM
  #9  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (26)
 
Wicked94Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Spokane, Wa
Posts: 3,725
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

there's some hp on the table above 4700, you can see the tq curve take a slight hit when it starts to go rich. email the dyno sheet back to ion and he can probably fix that right up for you. Honestly we're talking about 5 hp here, but still it made great numbers as is. You can see the nice torque this cam makes over a cc306 with that wild split, and it probably only gives up a few hp up top which seems like a good trade-off.
Old 05-23-2010, 10:15 PM
  #10  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
Spiers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: St Joseph, MO
Posts: 739
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I already have the SVO #30. Just waiting on the funds for a rearend with gears so I can retune all at once, up my idle to 800, and have Ion touch up that A/F! The tuner said I should be at 13 instead of 11-12. Driveability is good unless I'm trying to cruise low in 1st... but that's because I have 3.23 gears
Old 05-23-2010, 10:33 PM
  #11  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (26)
 
Wicked94Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Spokane, Wa
Posts: 3,725
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

i like those wheels too BTW, clean looking car
Old 05-23-2010, 10:37 PM
  #12  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (26)
 
1961ba427's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Milledgeville, GA
Posts: 1,909
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Very impressive. Subscribing in hopes you update this thread when you get through with the injectors and re-tune.
Old 05-24-2010, 04:53 AM
  #13  
Teching In
 
MICHZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Wicked94Z
there's some hp on the table above 4700, you can see the tq curve take a slight hit when it starts to go rich. email the dyno sheet back to ion and he can probably fix that right up for you. Honestly we're talking about 5 hp here, but still it made great numbers as is. You can see the nice torque this cam makes over a cc306 with that wild split, and it probably only gives up a few hp up top which seems like a good trade-off.
This cam also has faster ramp rates than the 306 so that helps with the torque too.

I plan on running the same cam but with a 110lsa
Old 05-24-2010, 10:05 AM
  #14  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (35)
 
StealthFormula's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Skippack, PA
Posts: 4,798
Received 54 Likes on 50 Posts

Default

Great results. That is an excellent cam, not too many people run it but they all have had great results from it. I see no need to run the cc306 when you can get similar numbers with the XE 230/236 and have more torque and better driveability.
Old 05-24-2010, 05:14 PM
  #15  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
Spiers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: St Joseph, MO
Posts: 739
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Thanks.

You're right... I don't see many people run this cam. That's a big reason why I chose this one. Plus the exact reasons you just stated, not to mention I really like the lope it has to it. Everyone has a cc503 or cc306 so this one is sort of in-between.
Old 05-25-2010, 12:03 PM
  #16  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (12)
 
chavez885's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Concord, CA
Posts: 2,382
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Nice numbers!
Old 05-26-2010, 07:45 PM
  #17  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (12)
 
lethal bird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Dekalb, Ms
Posts: 1,828
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

nice numbers im looking in the this cam myself.
Old 05-26-2010, 08:51 PM
  #18  
TECH Junkie
 
1989GTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,092
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Not bad numbers at all. However IMHO your car is running rich looking at the graph and has more power in it. Looks like it is around 12:1 and goes even richer above 4800rpm. You stand to gain more power by getting the AFR around 13:1.
Old 05-26-2010, 09:39 PM
  #19  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
Spiers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: St Joseph, MO
Posts: 739
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I agree.... I wonder how much though
Old 05-27-2010, 09:11 PM
  #20  
TECH Junkie
 
1989GTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,092
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Hard to say but I would bet on 10+ rwhp at a minimum.


Quick Reply: Another Cam Only Dyno Result



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:37 AM.