CC503 LT1 Dyno graphs

Not bad for the old Lt1
The stock heads are choking the cam and thats why the power is peaking at 5.8KRPM. That cam can easily make power over 6K with ported heads. The BBK's are probably playing a small role but they are not the smoking gun IMO.
Sounds like climate conditions sucked for the tuning. Maybe a small role there. I would start checking things and datalogging to find any possible issues.
IMO, this motor should make ~330rwhp SAE.
The next step is to take it to the track and see what it can really do. The car pulls very hard through the RPM band and feels like it will turn some decent #'s on the track. Hopefully the track numbers will offset the dyno #'s with good running conditions.
Trending Topics
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
This thread should also not discourage anyone from the CC503. Just because the numbers weren't a little higher its not a bad cam. The car really pulls hard, I'm really impressed with the way the car feels. I've driven high horse vettes and this finally has that top-end pull feel. It's not the feel of a 468 rwhp vette but its alot of fun. With a few changes and better climate I wouldn't doubt another 10-15 rwhp. I can't wait to get it on the strip!
granted the DA was bad 4000'
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N3xrMN4poVw
granted the DA was bad 4000'
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N3xrMN4poVw
granted the DA was bad 4000'
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N3xrMN4poVw
i got a question..he only trapped a 103..i have almost the same as him but ima a m6 on street tires no throttle body no heads.. and ima trapping 110's..do maulas realy make that much more top and at the tracks compared to autos? ive heard m6 trap high but a4's get out the whole way better..should his be higher then a 103? and also i ran a 13.0 and he was like 12.97? i think





.