Freak or what?
Car was a fully loaded 94' Trans Am (non-GT) auto, with factory 2:73 gears.
I bought it from the original owner, with 44k on it. First time out at the track it ran 13.7@101 on the shitty 225 bald street tires.
With just pacesetters, true duals, PCMforless tune and 275 drag radials it would go 13.3s all day at around 104.5
I never cracked the engine, never touched the trans or rear end. Never had a cold air kit, any weight reduction or suspension/chassis mods. Also never cut better than a 1.9 60' time.
It doesn't seem unreasonable to me, any thoughts?
EDIT: Here's a vid, just found it.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oMWvJzwpm40
Trending Topics
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
Ram air 95 ta- your buddy needs to put the drugs down or the camera down!
i wouldnt consider 13.7 a freak, thats what these cars SHOULD run. Thats what everyone goes off of, then like me, they go to the track and run consistant 14.4's and get pissed off. I'm not even running 13.7 with a stall and cutout. (13.8)
Most of these cars do go 13.3-ish with headers and what not.
Car was a fully loaded 94' Trans Am (non-GT) auto, with factory 2:73 gears.
I bought it from the original owner, with 44k on it. First time out at the track it ran 13.7@101 on the shitty 225 bald street tires.
With just pacesetters, true duals, PCMforless tune and 275 drag radials it would go 13.3s all day at around 104.5
I never cracked the engine, never touched the trans or rear end. Never had a cold air kit, any weight reduction or suspension/chassis mods. Also never cut better than a 1.9 60' time.
It doesn't seem unreasonable to me, any thoughts?
Last edited by kinglt-1; Oct 22, 2010 at 06:09 PM. Reason: felt the need to ramble on a bit more lol
I think my 60ft was only 2.1
So pretty normal for a good running car. But at this age, many are not. First time I took mine to the track it ran 15s
(ignition issues). 







