rear end gears ???????
#24
TECH Enthusiast
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 543
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#25
Village Troll ![](http://jameskellock.tripod.com/sitebuildercontent/sitebuilderpictures/rsman.jpg)
![](http://jameskellock.tripod.com/sitebuildercontent/sitebuilderpictures/rsman.jpg)
iTrader: (2)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
This is what I found...
Borg-Warner T56:
1993 3.36 2.07 1.35 1.00 0.80 0.62 (std)
1993 2.97 2.07 1.43 1.00 0.80 0.62 (G92)
1994 2.66 1.78 1.30 1.00 0.74 0.50
1995 2.66 1.78 1.30 1.00 0.74 0.50
The 1993 was a highly coveted trans for drag racing because of its 1st gear ratio, however IIRC it was not as durable as the T56's to follow.
Borg-Warner T56:
1993 3.36 2.07 1.35 1.00 0.80 0.62 (std)
1993 2.97 2.07 1.43 1.00 0.80 0.62 (G92)
1994 2.66 1.78 1.30 1.00 0.74 0.50
1995 2.66 1.78 1.30 1.00 0.74 0.50
The 1993 was a highly coveted trans for drag racing because of its 1st gear ratio, however IIRC it was not as durable as the T56's to follow.
#29
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 1,084
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Hey, i'm not out to prove anything or disprove, but i had 3.08's. end of story. Why? who knows! maybe someone f'd up at the plant. or maybe they had a dealership replace them and change the pcm. But my tune was a factory/dealership tune. I don't care about this argument, i was just pointing out that mine wasn't "normal".
#30
TECH Veteran
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Hey, i'm not out to prove anything or disprove, but i had 3.08's. end of story. Why? who knows! maybe someone f'd up at the plant. or maybe they had a dealership replace them and change the pcm. But my tune was a factory/dealership tune. I don't care about this argument, i was just pointing out that mine wasn't "normal".
![Happy](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_stretch.gif)