LT1-LT4 Modifications 1993-97 Gen II Small Block V8

My first 383 Build

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-28-2011, 02:02 PM
  #21  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (8)
 
96TransAmboosted's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Pinellas Park Florida
Posts: 1,550
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Hard to say, I did not see any CR anywhere. And the heads cast or ported?
Old 09-28-2011, 02:03 PM
  #22  
9-Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
Ed Wright's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Tulsa, OK
Posts: 3,397
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by CPrice929
Anyone have a idea of what horsepower and torque ill be making out of this setup.
I'm afraid not much with chambers that big. Low compression.
Old 09-28-2011, 02:10 PM
  #23  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
CPrice929's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Saginaw,MI
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 96TransAmboosted
Hard to say, I did not see any CR anywhere. And the heads cast or ported?
Cr is around 11 to 1
Old 09-28-2011, 02:15 PM
  #24  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
CPrice929's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Saginaw,MI
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Ed Wright
I'm afraid not much with chambers that big. Low compression.
Wouldnt i want a lower compression when running nitrous
Old 09-28-2011, 02:17 PM
  #25  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (14)
 
Lawhead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: \
Posts: 2,397
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Not at all
Old 09-28-2011, 04:20 PM
  #26  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
RamAir95TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 9,467
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Nitrous loves compression - boost does not.
Old 09-28-2011, 05:04 PM
  #27  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
CPrice929's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Saginaw,MI
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RamAir95TA
Nitrous loves compression - boost does not.
So my best bet would be to go with boost?And if so how much?
Old 09-28-2011, 05:26 PM
  #28  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (14)
 
Lawhead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: \
Posts: 2,397
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

He didn't say that.........

He is saying lower compression ratios are better for a boosted app. 11:1 isn't a bad compression ratio you could have went a lil higher yes but 11:1 is to high for any type of boost. Keep what you haven now and spray it.
Old 09-28-2011, 05:40 PM
  #29  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
96capricemgr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,975
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts

Default

11.1 is too low for a proper NA/nitrous setup and too high for a proper boost setup. Most guys who put ported heads and a bigger cam in a stock shortblock run more compression.

We could have helped a whole lot more had you asked questions from people who know what they are doing beforehand.

Should contact a magazine though, you build is a magazine dream build, might be able to get your car some ink.

What is the .050" duration on the cam?
Old 09-28-2011, 07:28 PM
  #30  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
CPrice929's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Saginaw,MI
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 96capricemgr
11.1 is too low for a proper NA/nitrous setup and too high for a proper boost setup. Most guys who put ported heads and a bigger cam in a stock shortblock run more compression.

We could have helped a whole lot more had you asked questions from people who know what they are doing beforehand.

Should contact a magazine though, you build is a magazine dream build, might be able to get your car some ink.

What is the .050" duration on the cam?
242/245 @.050. 573/.573 110 lsa
Old 09-28-2011, 08:13 PM
  #31  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
 
97Z28SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 1,290
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

CPrice I haven't slammed my engine in the car yet with this damned rain every fricken weekend, so I haven't had a chnce to enjoy anything yet. However I went with the setup because it's getting harder and harder to find anyone local to me who even tunes LT1s anymore and everyone can tune LSx plus I like the coil per cylinder setup. It's more reliable than the opti and cheaper than going DFI or something else aftermarket.
Old 09-28-2011, 08:38 PM
  #32  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
CPrice929's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Saginaw,MI
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 97Z28SS
CPrice I haven't slammed my engine in the car yet with this damned rain every fricken weekend, so I haven't had a chnce to enjoy anything yet. However I went with the setup because it's getting harder and harder to find anyone local to me who even tunes LT1s anymore and everyone can tune LSx plus I like the coil per cylinder setup. It's more reliable than the opti and cheaper than going DFI or something else aftermarket.
I feel you on that one.i have to take my car to detroit for a good dyno tune.
Old 09-28-2011, 08:43 PM
  #33  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
96capricemgr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,975
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by CPrice929
242/245 @.050. 573/.573 110 lsa

Now you are running a SLIGHTLY different intake but the successful LT1 383 hydraulic builds are usually more like mid 230s for intake duration and over .600lift with modern springs and lobes. The ultra short intake runners shift the rpm range upwards quite a bit. With cams that much shorter duration than your's they can go all the way to the pcm's limitations. Stock shortblocks go to 7100rpms on cams under 230degrees.

IMO the only thing that will keep the top of your power curve usable will be those heads choking the engine. With ported heads that cam would have likely peaked up in the 7000rpm range, ideally you have room to rev past peak HP by 4-500rpm so you use the whole top of the curve. The pcm will only handle 7-7200 depending on which one and if you got a good one.

If you have ignition troubles the MSD opti should be your first suspect as they are a step backwards from stock.

Even on the bottle I think 3.90-4.10s would have been a better choice, the double overdrive eats it right up on the road and even the 4.10s would let you hit 140mph with a 28" tire in 4th

Hope you prove me wrong and the thing makes 450rwhp and runs low 11s NA, but I don't think so, I think you got a lot of poor information based on gen 1 stuff and this is going to be a high 11 second NA car.

I think you could have gotten more for less by asking questions FIRST.
Look at RamAir95TA's setup as an example of a well done hydraulic cammed 383, you can see all the mods in the for sale link in his sig. In benchracing your setup is theoretically better, at the track though it will be a different story entirely, you would need the jug to challenge his car's performance.
Old 09-28-2011, 09:00 PM
  #34  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
CPrice929's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Saginaw,MI
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 96capricemgr
Now you are running a SLIGHTLY different intake but the successful LT1 383 hydraulic builds are usually more like mid 230s for intake duration and over .600lift with modern springs and lobes. The ultra short intake runners shift the rpm range upwards quite a bit. With cams that much shorter duration than your's they can go all the way to the pcm's limitations. Stock shortblocks go to 7100rpms on cams under 230degrees.

IMO the only thing that will keep the top of your power curve usable will be those heads choking the engine. With ported heads that cam would have likely peaked up in the 7000rpm range, ideally you have room to rev past peak HP by 4-500rpm so you use the whole top of the curve. The pcm will only handle 7-7200 depending on which one and if you got a good one.

If you have ignition troubles the MSD opti should be your first suspect as they are a step backwards from stock.

Even on the bottle I think 3.90-4.10s would have been a better choice, the double overdrive eats it right up on the road and even the 4.10s would let you hit 140mph with a 28" tire in 4th

Hope you prove me wrong and the thing makes 450rwhp and runs low 11s NA, but I don't think so, I think you got a lot of poor information based on gen 1 stuff and this is going to be a high 11 second NA car.

I think you could have gotten more for less by asking questions FIRST.
Look at RamAir95TA's setup as an example of a well done hydraulic cammed 383, you can see all the mods in the for sale link in his sig. In benchracing your setup is theoretically better, at the track though it will be a different story entirely, you would need the jug to challenge his car's performance.
I apreciate the input and honesty.i will keep you posted as it goes. And ill also remeber to check in and ask first and build later the next go around.like i said this is my first build. But it definatley wont be my last.
Old 09-28-2011, 09:02 PM
  #35  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (11)
 
merim123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Chitown, IL
Posts: 1,892
Received 17 Likes on 15 Posts

Default

you didn't state headgasket or deck height, assuming you are running a .039/4.100 headgasket and -.016 deck height your compression is 10.6:1
Old 09-29-2011, 04:29 AM
  #36  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
RamAir95TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 9,467
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Just because it's your first build doesn't mean you can't build a strong motor. My motor is the first real performance build I've ever done and look how that turned out. You just have to do your homework and research.
Old 10-05-2011, 10:33 PM
  #37  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
CPrice929's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Saginaw,MI
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Got a tune fro pcmforless coming in.Should be here tomorrow.Will keep everyone posted on the build.
Ps. Thanks to everyones input. Learned a few things for being a newbie to the lt1 scene.



Quick Reply: My first 383 Build



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:14 PM.